How well do patients with exstrophy actually void?

Elizabeth B. Yerkes, Mark C. Adams, Richard C. Rink, John C. Pope IV, John W. Brock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Achieving continence and preserving renal function are goals in the care of patients with bladder exstrophy. The Young-Dees-Leadbetter bladder neck reconstruction should ideally provide continence and normal voiding dynamics without the need for intermittent catheterization. We review our experience with bladder neck reconstruction in this population with emphasis on voiding dynamics among those patients doing well. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients with the exstrophy-epispadias complex seen at our institutions since 1985. We reviewed staged reconstruction in 53 patients, including 31 with classic bladder exstrophy, 4 with exstrophy variants and 18 with incontinent epispadias. Patients with additional neurogenic dysfunction were excluded from study. Subjective and objective data regarding voiding function and complications were collected. Results: Complete reconstruction for continence was performed in 38 cases, of which 11 that required bladder augmentation with bladder neck reconstruction or who had a different primary continence procedure were excluded from study. The remaining 27 patients treated with the Young-Dees-Leadbetter bladder neck reconstruction had 2 or more years of followup (mean 5.9). Dry intervals of at least 2 hours were achieved by 18 patients and all were considered by parents to void well. Despite near or total subjective continence and 'good' voiding, 13 of these 18 patients (72%) have clinical problems related to emptying, which include recurrent urinary tract infections in 10, epididymitis in 2 and bladder calculi in 4. Objective urodynamic parameters confirm poor voiding in most patients. Conclusions: Bladder neck reconstruction in patients with exstrophy can achieve continence without intermittent catheterization. In our experience patients who achieve these goals have an alarming frequency of clinical and urodynamic problems related to emptying. One must question the normalcy of the voiding pattern and price to achieve continence among patients with exstrophy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1044-1047
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume164
Issue number3 II
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2000

Fingerprint

Urinary Bladder
Epispadias
Bladder Exstrophy
Urodynamics
Catheterization
Epididymitis
Urinary Bladder Calculi
Urinary Tract Infections
Patient Care
Parents
Kidney
Population

Keywords

  • Bladder exstrophy
  • Infection
  • Postoperative complications
  • Reconstructive surgical procedures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Yerkes, E. B., Adams, M. C., Rink, R. C., Pope IV, J. C., & Brock, J. W. (2000). How well do patients with exstrophy actually void? Journal of Urology, 164(3 II), 1044-1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67246-1

How well do patients with exstrophy actually void? / Yerkes, Elizabeth B.; Adams, Mark C.; Rink, Richard C.; Pope IV, John C.; Brock, John W.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 164, No. 3 II, 09.2000, p. 1044-1047.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yerkes, EB, Adams, MC, Rink, RC, Pope IV, JC & Brock, JW 2000, 'How well do patients with exstrophy actually void?', Journal of Urology, vol. 164, no. 3 II, pp. 1044-1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67246-1
Yerkes EB, Adams MC, Rink RC, Pope IV JC, Brock JW. How well do patients with exstrophy actually void? Journal of Urology. 2000 Sep;164(3 II):1044-1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67246-1
Yerkes, Elizabeth B. ; Adams, Mark C. ; Rink, Richard C. ; Pope IV, John C. ; Brock, John W. / How well do patients with exstrophy actually void?. In: Journal of Urology. 2000 ; Vol. 164, No. 3 II. pp. 1044-1047.
@article{cfdb0e749fa940f1b4443a0cf13ca9b9,
title = "How well do patients with exstrophy actually void?",
abstract = "Purpose: Achieving continence and preserving renal function are goals in the care of patients with bladder exstrophy. The Young-Dees-Leadbetter bladder neck reconstruction should ideally provide continence and normal voiding dynamics without the need for intermittent catheterization. We review our experience with bladder neck reconstruction in this population with emphasis on voiding dynamics among those patients doing well. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients with the exstrophy-epispadias complex seen at our institutions since 1985. We reviewed staged reconstruction in 53 patients, including 31 with classic bladder exstrophy, 4 with exstrophy variants and 18 with incontinent epispadias. Patients with additional neurogenic dysfunction were excluded from study. Subjective and objective data regarding voiding function and complications were collected. Results: Complete reconstruction for continence was performed in 38 cases, of which 11 that required bladder augmentation with bladder neck reconstruction or who had a different primary continence procedure were excluded from study. The remaining 27 patients treated with the Young-Dees-Leadbetter bladder neck reconstruction had 2 or more years of followup (mean 5.9). Dry intervals of at least 2 hours were achieved by 18 patients and all were considered by parents to void well. Despite near or total subjective continence and 'good' voiding, 13 of these 18 patients (72{\%}) have clinical problems related to emptying, which include recurrent urinary tract infections in 10, epididymitis in 2 and bladder calculi in 4. Objective urodynamic parameters confirm poor voiding in most patients. Conclusions: Bladder neck reconstruction in patients with exstrophy can achieve continence without intermittent catheterization. In our experience patients who achieve these goals have an alarming frequency of clinical and urodynamic problems related to emptying. One must question the normalcy of the voiding pattern and price to achieve continence among patients with exstrophy.",
keywords = "Bladder exstrophy, Infection, Postoperative complications, Reconstructive surgical procedures",
author = "Yerkes, {Elizabeth B.} and Adams, {Mark C.} and Rink, {Richard C.} and {Pope IV}, {John C.} and Brock, {John W.}",
year = "2000",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67246-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "164",
pages = "1044--1047",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3 II",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How well do patients with exstrophy actually void?

AU - Yerkes, Elizabeth B.

AU - Adams, Mark C.

AU - Rink, Richard C.

AU - Pope IV, John C.

AU - Brock, John W.

PY - 2000/9

Y1 - 2000/9

N2 - Purpose: Achieving continence and preserving renal function are goals in the care of patients with bladder exstrophy. The Young-Dees-Leadbetter bladder neck reconstruction should ideally provide continence and normal voiding dynamics without the need for intermittent catheterization. We review our experience with bladder neck reconstruction in this population with emphasis on voiding dynamics among those patients doing well. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients with the exstrophy-epispadias complex seen at our institutions since 1985. We reviewed staged reconstruction in 53 patients, including 31 with classic bladder exstrophy, 4 with exstrophy variants and 18 with incontinent epispadias. Patients with additional neurogenic dysfunction were excluded from study. Subjective and objective data regarding voiding function and complications were collected. Results: Complete reconstruction for continence was performed in 38 cases, of which 11 that required bladder augmentation with bladder neck reconstruction or who had a different primary continence procedure were excluded from study. The remaining 27 patients treated with the Young-Dees-Leadbetter bladder neck reconstruction had 2 or more years of followup (mean 5.9). Dry intervals of at least 2 hours were achieved by 18 patients and all were considered by parents to void well. Despite near or total subjective continence and 'good' voiding, 13 of these 18 patients (72%) have clinical problems related to emptying, which include recurrent urinary tract infections in 10, epididymitis in 2 and bladder calculi in 4. Objective urodynamic parameters confirm poor voiding in most patients. Conclusions: Bladder neck reconstruction in patients with exstrophy can achieve continence without intermittent catheterization. In our experience patients who achieve these goals have an alarming frequency of clinical and urodynamic problems related to emptying. One must question the normalcy of the voiding pattern and price to achieve continence among patients with exstrophy.

AB - Purpose: Achieving continence and preserving renal function are goals in the care of patients with bladder exstrophy. The Young-Dees-Leadbetter bladder neck reconstruction should ideally provide continence and normal voiding dynamics without the need for intermittent catheterization. We review our experience with bladder neck reconstruction in this population with emphasis on voiding dynamics among those patients doing well. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients with the exstrophy-epispadias complex seen at our institutions since 1985. We reviewed staged reconstruction in 53 patients, including 31 with classic bladder exstrophy, 4 with exstrophy variants and 18 with incontinent epispadias. Patients with additional neurogenic dysfunction were excluded from study. Subjective and objective data regarding voiding function and complications were collected. Results: Complete reconstruction for continence was performed in 38 cases, of which 11 that required bladder augmentation with bladder neck reconstruction or who had a different primary continence procedure were excluded from study. The remaining 27 patients treated with the Young-Dees-Leadbetter bladder neck reconstruction had 2 or more years of followup (mean 5.9). Dry intervals of at least 2 hours were achieved by 18 patients and all were considered by parents to void well. Despite near or total subjective continence and 'good' voiding, 13 of these 18 patients (72%) have clinical problems related to emptying, which include recurrent urinary tract infections in 10, epididymitis in 2 and bladder calculi in 4. Objective urodynamic parameters confirm poor voiding in most patients. Conclusions: Bladder neck reconstruction in patients with exstrophy can achieve continence without intermittent catheterization. In our experience patients who achieve these goals have an alarming frequency of clinical and urodynamic problems related to emptying. One must question the normalcy of the voiding pattern and price to achieve continence among patients with exstrophy.

KW - Bladder exstrophy

KW - Infection

KW - Postoperative complications

KW - Reconstructive surgical procedures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033890627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033890627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67246-1

DO - 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67246-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 10958737

AN - SCOPUS:0033890627

VL - 164

SP - 1044

EP - 1047

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 3 II

ER -