Human adipocyte viability testing: A new assay

Julia W. MacRae, Sunil S. Tholpady, Adam J. Katz, Thomas G. Gampper, David B. Drake, Roy C. Ogle, Raymond F. Morgan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Surgical experience and anecdotal data on the most effective method of harvesting, preparing, and injecting autologous fat grafts are inconsistent and conflicting. Because the limitation of fat grafting is its resorption, understanding how various handling techniques affect adipocyte survival is crucial to optimizing its long-term survival. Objective: We sought to develop a method for assaying fat viability in its clinically used form and then to test several common techniques used in fat grafting for their effects on the viability of the fat. Methods: We performed the well-established MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrasodium bromide] cell survival and proliferation assay on fat, but the colored enzyme-breakdown product could not be released into the supernatant for spectrophotometric analysis. An entirely new protocol was developed that allowed the MTT assay to quantitate the viability of free fat grafts. The assay was able to distinguish between different quantities of live fat and to quantify the decrease in viability when the fat is stored. We subjected the fat to various treatments, including insulin and Triton-X 100 detergent, (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) centrifugation, extrusion through different types and sizes of needles, and freezing. Results: With the exception of detergent, which decreased viability, all other treatments had no statistically significant effect on adipocyte survival. Freezing did not result in decreased cell viability. Conclusions: It is unlikely that variations in the clinical results of free fat grafting are the result of the handling techniques examined in this study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)265-269
Number of pages5
JournalAesthetic Surgery Journal
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Adipocytes
Fats
Detergents
Freezing
Cell Survival
Transplants
Octoxynol
Bromides
Centrifugation
Needles
Cell Proliferation
Insulin
Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

MacRae, J. W., Tholpady, S. S., Katz, A. J., Gampper, T. G., Drake, D. B., Ogle, R. C., & Morgan, R. F. (2003). Human adipocyte viability testing: A new assay. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 23(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-820X(03)00151-1

Human adipocyte viability testing : A new assay. / MacRae, Julia W.; Tholpady, Sunil S.; Katz, Adam J.; Gampper, Thomas G.; Drake, David B.; Ogle, Roy C.; Morgan, Raymond F.

In: Aesthetic Surgery Journal, Vol. 23, No. 4, 07.2003, p. 265-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

MacRae, JW, Tholpady, SS, Katz, AJ, Gampper, TG, Drake, DB, Ogle, RC & Morgan, RF 2003, 'Human adipocyte viability testing: A new assay', Aesthetic Surgery Journal, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-820X(03)00151-1
MacRae JW, Tholpady SS, Katz AJ, Gampper TG, Drake DB, Ogle RC et al. Human adipocyte viability testing: A new assay. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2003 Jul;23(4):265-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-820X(03)00151-1
MacRae, Julia W. ; Tholpady, Sunil S. ; Katz, Adam J. ; Gampper, Thomas G. ; Drake, David B. ; Ogle, Roy C. ; Morgan, Raymond F. / Human adipocyte viability testing : A new assay. In: Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2003 ; Vol. 23, No. 4. pp. 265-269.
@article{5990633f313f49589ffdb9a84b4da621,
title = "Human adipocyte viability testing: A new assay",
abstract = "Background: Surgical experience and anecdotal data on the most effective method of harvesting, preparing, and injecting autologous fat grafts are inconsistent and conflicting. Because the limitation of fat grafting is its resorption, understanding how various handling techniques affect adipocyte survival is crucial to optimizing its long-term survival. Objective: We sought to develop a method for assaying fat viability in its clinically used form and then to test several common techniques used in fat grafting for their effects on the viability of the fat. Methods: We performed the well-established MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrasodium bromide] cell survival and proliferation assay on fat, but the colored enzyme-breakdown product could not be released into the supernatant for spectrophotometric analysis. An entirely new protocol was developed that allowed the MTT assay to quantitate the viability of free fat grafts. The assay was able to distinguish between different quantities of live fat and to quantify the decrease in viability when the fat is stored. We subjected the fat to various treatments, including insulin and Triton-X 100 detergent, (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) centrifugation, extrusion through different types and sizes of needles, and freezing. Results: With the exception of detergent, which decreased viability, all other treatments had no statistically significant effect on adipocyte survival. Freezing did not result in decreased cell viability. Conclusions: It is unlikely that variations in the clinical results of free fat grafting are the result of the handling techniques examined in this study.",
author = "MacRae, {Julia W.} and Tholpady, {Sunil S.} and Katz, {Adam J.} and Gampper, {Thomas G.} and Drake, {David B.} and Ogle, {Roy C.} and Morgan, {Raymond F.}",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/S1090-820X(03)00151-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "265--269",
journal = "Aesthetic Surgery Journal",
issn = "1090-820X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human adipocyte viability testing

T2 - A new assay

AU - MacRae, Julia W.

AU - Tholpady, Sunil S.

AU - Katz, Adam J.

AU - Gampper, Thomas G.

AU - Drake, David B.

AU - Ogle, Roy C.

AU - Morgan, Raymond F.

PY - 2003/7

Y1 - 2003/7

N2 - Background: Surgical experience and anecdotal data on the most effective method of harvesting, preparing, and injecting autologous fat grafts are inconsistent and conflicting. Because the limitation of fat grafting is its resorption, understanding how various handling techniques affect adipocyte survival is crucial to optimizing its long-term survival. Objective: We sought to develop a method for assaying fat viability in its clinically used form and then to test several common techniques used in fat grafting for their effects on the viability of the fat. Methods: We performed the well-established MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrasodium bromide] cell survival and proliferation assay on fat, but the colored enzyme-breakdown product could not be released into the supernatant for spectrophotometric analysis. An entirely new protocol was developed that allowed the MTT assay to quantitate the viability of free fat grafts. The assay was able to distinguish between different quantities of live fat and to quantify the decrease in viability when the fat is stored. We subjected the fat to various treatments, including insulin and Triton-X 100 detergent, (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) centrifugation, extrusion through different types and sizes of needles, and freezing. Results: With the exception of detergent, which decreased viability, all other treatments had no statistically significant effect on adipocyte survival. Freezing did not result in decreased cell viability. Conclusions: It is unlikely that variations in the clinical results of free fat grafting are the result of the handling techniques examined in this study.

AB - Background: Surgical experience and anecdotal data on the most effective method of harvesting, preparing, and injecting autologous fat grafts are inconsistent and conflicting. Because the limitation of fat grafting is its resorption, understanding how various handling techniques affect adipocyte survival is crucial to optimizing its long-term survival. Objective: We sought to develop a method for assaying fat viability in its clinically used form and then to test several common techniques used in fat grafting for their effects on the viability of the fat. Methods: We performed the well-established MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrasodium bromide] cell survival and proliferation assay on fat, but the colored enzyme-breakdown product could not be released into the supernatant for spectrophotometric analysis. An entirely new protocol was developed that allowed the MTT assay to quantitate the viability of free fat grafts. The assay was able to distinguish between different quantities of live fat and to quantify the decrease in viability when the fat is stored. We subjected the fat to various treatments, including insulin and Triton-X 100 detergent, (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) centrifugation, extrusion through different types and sizes of needles, and freezing. Results: With the exception of detergent, which decreased viability, all other treatments had no statistically significant effect on adipocyte survival. Freezing did not result in decreased cell viability. Conclusions: It is unlikely that variations in the clinical results of free fat grafting are the result of the handling techniques examined in this study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042377544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042377544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1090-820X(03)00151-1

DO - 10.1016/S1090-820X(03)00151-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 19336086

AN - SCOPUS:0042377544

VL - 23

SP - 265

EP - 269

JO - Aesthetic Surgery Journal

JF - Aesthetic Surgery Journal

SN - 1090-820X

IS - 4

ER -