Hydroxyurea Dose Escalation for Sickle Cell Anemia in Sub-Saharan Africa

Chandy C. John, Robert O. Opoka, Teresa S. Latham, Heather A. Hume, Catherine Nabaggala, Phillip Kasirye, Christopher M. Ndugwa, Adam Lane, Russell E. Ware

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hydroxyurea has proven safety, feasibility, and efficacy in children with sickle cell anemia in sub-Saharan Africa, with studies showing a reduced incidence of vaso-occlusive events and reduced mortality. Dosing standards remain undetermined, however, and whether escalation to the maximum tolerated dose confers clinical benefits that outweigh treatment-related toxic effects is unknown. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind trial, we compared hydroxyurea at a fixed dose (approximately 20 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) with dose escalation (approximately 30 mg per kilogram per day). The primary outcome was a hemoglobin level of 9.0 g or more per deciliter or a fetal hemoglobin level of 20% or more after 24 months. Secondary outcomes included the incidences of malaria, vaso-occlusive crises, and serious adverse events. RESULTS: Children received hydroxyurea at a fixed dose (94 children; mean [±SD] age, 4.6±1.0 years) or with dose escalation (93 children; mean age, 4.8±0.9 years); the mean doses were 19.2±1.8 mg per kilogram per day and 29.5±3.6 mg per kilogram per day, respectively. The data and safety monitoring board halted the trial when the numbers of clinical events were significantly lower among children receiving escalated dosing than among those receiving a fixed dose. At trial closure, 86% of the children in the dose-escalation group had reached the primary-outcome thresholds, as compared with 37% of the children in the fixed-dose group (P<0.001). Children in the dose-escalation group had fewer sickle cell-related adverse events (incidence rate ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34 to 0.54), vaso-occlusive pain crises (incidence rate ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.56), cases of acute chest syndrome or pneumonia (incidence rate ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.56), transfusions (incidence rate ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.43), and hospitalizations (incidence rate ratio, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.34). Laboratory-confirmed dose-limiting toxic effects were similar in the two groups, and there were no cases of severe neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Among children with sickle cell anemia in sub-Saharan Africa, hydroxyurea with dose escalation had superior clinical efficacy to that of fixed-dose hydroxyurea, with equivalent safety. (Funded by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation and the Cincinnati Children's Research Foundation; NOHARM MTD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03128515.).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2524-2533
Number of pages10
JournalThe New England journal of medicine
Volume382
Issue number26
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 25 2020
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Hydroxyurea Dose Escalation for Sickle Cell Anemia in Sub-Saharan Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    John, C. C., Opoka, R. O., Latham, T. S., Hume, H. A., Nabaggala, C., Kasirye, P., Ndugwa, C. M., Lane, A., & Ware, R. E. (2020). Hydroxyurea Dose Escalation for Sickle Cell Anemia in Sub-Saharan Africa. The New England journal of medicine, 382(26), 2524-2533. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2000146