Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study

Pamela A. Sample, Felipe A. Medeiros, Lyne Racette, John P. Pascual, Catherine Boden, Linda M. Zangwill, Christopher Bowd, Robert N. Weinreb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE. To compare the diagnostic results of four perimetric tests and to identify useful parameters from each for determining abnormality. METHODS. One hundred eleven eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON), 31 with progressive optic neuropathy (PGON) 53 with ocular hypertension, and 51 with no disease were included (N = 246). Visual field results were not used to classify the eyes. Short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP), frequency-doubling technology perimetry (FDT), high-pass resolution perimetry (HPRP), and standard automated perimetry (SAP) were performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compute the areas under the curves (AUC) and sensitivity levels at given specificities for a variety of abnormality criteria. The agreement among tests for abnormality, location, and extent of visual field deficit were assessed. RESULTS. AUC analysis: When the normal group was compared with the GON group, the FDT pattern SD (PSD) area was larger than the HPRP PSD (P = 0.020), and the FDT area of total deviation (TD)

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3381-3389
Number of pages9
JournalInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Volume47
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Visual Field Tests
Glaucoma
Optic Nerve Diseases
Technology
Visual Fields
Area Under Curve
Ocular Hypertension
ROC Curve

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Sample, P. A., Medeiros, F. A., Racette, L., Pascual, J. P., Boden, C., Zangwill, L. M., ... Weinreb, R. N. (2006). Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 47(8), 3381-3389. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-1546

Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study. / Sample, Pamela A.; Medeiros, Felipe A.; Racette, Lyne; Pascual, John P.; Boden, Catherine; Zangwill, Linda M.; Bowd, Christopher; Weinreb, Robert N.

In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Vol. 47, No. 8, 08.2006, p. 3381-3389.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sample, PA, Medeiros, FA, Racette, L, Pascual, JP, Boden, C, Zangwill, LM, Bowd, C & Weinreb, RN 2006, 'Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study', Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 3381-3389. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-1546
Sample, Pamela A. ; Medeiros, Felipe A. ; Racette, Lyne ; Pascual, John P. ; Boden, Catherine ; Zangwill, Linda M. ; Bowd, Christopher ; Weinreb, Robert N. / Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study. In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2006 ; Vol. 47, No. 8. pp. 3381-3389.
@article{2d88cfd4a4a34e298f585093acb1801e,
title = "Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study",
abstract = "PURPOSE. To compare the diagnostic results of four perimetric tests and to identify useful parameters from each for determining abnormality. METHODS. One hundred eleven eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON), 31 with progressive optic neuropathy (PGON) 53 with ocular hypertension, and 51 with no disease were included (N = 246). Visual field results were not used to classify the eyes. Short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP), frequency-doubling technology perimetry (FDT), high-pass resolution perimetry (HPRP), and standard automated perimetry (SAP) were performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compute the areas under the curves (AUC) and sensitivity levels at given specificities for a variety of abnormality criteria. The agreement among tests for abnormality, location, and extent of visual field deficit were assessed. RESULTS. AUC analysis: When the normal group was compared with the GON group, the FDT pattern SD (PSD) area was larger than the HPRP PSD (P = 0.020), and the FDT area of total deviation (TD)",
author = "Sample, {Pamela A.} and Medeiros, {Felipe A.} and Lyne Racette and Pascual, {John P.} and Catherine Boden and Zangwill, {Linda M.} and Christopher Bowd and Weinreb, {Robert N.}",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1167/iovs.05-1546",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "3381--3389",
journal = "Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science",
issn = "0146-0404",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study

AU - Sample, Pamela A.

AU - Medeiros, Felipe A.

AU - Racette, Lyne

AU - Pascual, John P.

AU - Boden, Catherine

AU - Zangwill, Linda M.

AU - Bowd, Christopher

AU - Weinreb, Robert N.

PY - 2006/8

Y1 - 2006/8

N2 - PURPOSE. To compare the diagnostic results of four perimetric tests and to identify useful parameters from each for determining abnormality. METHODS. One hundred eleven eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON), 31 with progressive optic neuropathy (PGON) 53 with ocular hypertension, and 51 with no disease were included (N = 246). Visual field results were not used to classify the eyes. Short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP), frequency-doubling technology perimetry (FDT), high-pass resolution perimetry (HPRP), and standard automated perimetry (SAP) were performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compute the areas under the curves (AUC) and sensitivity levels at given specificities for a variety of abnormality criteria. The agreement among tests for abnormality, location, and extent of visual field deficit were assessed. RESULTS. AUC analysis: When the normal group was compared with the GON group, the FDT pattern SD (PSD) area was larger than the HPRP PSD (P = 0.020), and the FDT area of total deviation (TD)

AB - PURPOSE. To compare the diagnostic results of four perimetric tests and to identify useful parameters from each for determining abnormality. METHODS. One hundred eleven eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON), 31 with progressive optic neuropathy (PGON) 53 with ocular hypertension, and 51 with no disease were included (N = 246). Visual field results were not used to classify the eyes. Short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP), frequency-doubling technology perimetry (FDT), high-pass resolution perimetry (HPRP), and standard automated perimetry (SAP) were performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compute the areas under the curves (AUC) and sensitivity levels at given specificities for a variety of abnormality criteria. The agreement among tests for abnormality, location, and extent of visual field deficit were assessed. RESULTS. AUC analysis: When the normal group was compared with the GON group, the FDT pattern SD (PSD) area was larger than the HPRP PSD (P = 0.020), and the FDT area of total deviation (TD)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748121628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748121628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/iovs.05-1546

DO - 10.1167/iovs.05-1546

M3 - Article

C2 - 16877406

AN - SCOPUS:33748121628

VL - 47

SP - 3381

EP - 3389

JO - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

JF - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

SN - 0146-0404

IS - 8

ER -