Imaging in Suspected Renal Colic

Systematic Review of the Literature and Multispecialty Consensus

Christopher L. Moore, Christopher R. Carpenter, Marta E. Heilbrun, Kevin Klauer, Amy Krambeck, Courtney Moreno, Erick M. Remer, Charles Scales, Melissa M. Shaw, Kevan M. Sternberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Study objective: Renal colic is common and computed tomography (CT) is frequently used when the diagnosis of kidney stone is suspected. CT is accurate but exposes patients to ionizing radiation and has not been shown to alter either interventional approaches or hospital admission rates. This multiorganizational transdisciplinary collaboration seeks evidence-based, multispecialty consensus on optimal imaging across different clinical scenarios in patients with suspected renal colic in the acute setting. Methods: In conjunction with the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Emergency Quality Network, we formed a 9-member panel with 3 physician representatives each from ACEP, the American College of Radiology, and the American Urology Association. A systematic literature review was used as the basis for a 3-step modified Delphi process to seek consensus on optimal imaging in 29 specific clinical scenarios. Results: From an initial search yielding 6,337 records, there were 232 relevant articles of acceptable evidence quality to guide the literature summary. At the completion of the Delphi process consensus, out of the 29 scenarios agreement was rated as perfect in 15 (52%), excellent in 8 (28%), good in 3 (10%), and moderate in 3 (10%). There were no scenarios in which at least moderate consensus was not reached. CT was recommended in 7 scenarios (24%), with ultrasonography in 9 (31%) and no further imaging needed in 12 (45%). Conclusion: Evidence and multispecialty consensus support ultrasonography or no further imaging in specific clinical scenarios, with reduced-radiation-dose CT to be used when CT is needed for patients with suspected renal colic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)391-399
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume74
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

Renal Colic
Consensus
Tomography
Ultrasonography
Emergencies
Physicians
Kidney Calculi
Urology
Ionizing Radiation
Radiology
Radiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Imaging in Suspected Renal Colic : Systematic Review of the Literature and Multispecialty Consensus. / Moore, Christopher L.; Carpenter, Christopher R.; Heilbrun, Marta E.; Klauer, Kevin; Krambeck, Amy; Moreno, Courtney; Remer, Erick M.; Scales, Charles; Shaw, Melissa M.; Sternberg, Kevan M.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 74, No. 3, 01.09.2019, p. 391-399.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moore, CL, Carpenter, CR, Heilbrun, ME, Klauer, K, Krambeck, A, Moreno, C, Remer, EM, Scales, C, Shaw, MM & Sternberg, KM 2019, 'Imaging in Suspected Renal Colic: Systematic Review of the Literature and Multispecialty Consensus', Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 391-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.04.021
Moore, Christopher L. ; Carpenter, Christopher R. ; Heilbrun, Marta E. ; Klauer, Kevin ; Krambeck, Amy ; Moreno, Courtney ; Remer, Erick M. ; Scales, Charles ; Shaw, Melissa M. ; Sternberg, Kevan M. / Imaging in Suspected Renal Colic : Systematic Review of the Literature and Multispecialty Consensus. In: Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 74, No. 3. pp. 391-399.
@article{f90eed5dfe174973817c3a904d84ca85,
title = "Imaging in Suspected Renal Colic: Systematic Review of the Literature and Multispecialty Consensus",
abstract = "Study objective: Renal colic is common and computed tomography (CT) is frequently used when the diagnosis of kidney stone is suspected. CT is accurate but exposes patients to ionizing radiation and has not been shown to alter either interventional approaches or hospital admission rates. This multiorganizational transdisciplinary collaboration seeks evidence-based, multispecialty consensus on optimal imaging across different clinical scenarios in patients with suspected renal colic in the acute setting. Methods: In conjunction with the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Emergency Quality Network, we formed a 9-member panel with 3 physician representatives each from ACEP, the American College of Radiology, and the American Urology Association. A systematic literature review was used as the basis for a 3-step modified Delphi process to seek consensus on optimal imaging in 29 specific clinical scenarios. Results: From an initial search yielding 6,337 records, there were 232 relevant articles of acceptable evidence quality to guide the literature summary. At the completion of the Delphi process consensus, out of the 29 scenarios agreement was rated as perfect in 15 (52{\%}), excellent in 8 (28{\%}), good in 3 (10{\%}), and moderate in 3 (10{\%}). There were no scenarios in which at least moderate consensus was not reached. CT was recommended in 7 scenarios (24{\%}), with ultrasonography in 9 (31{\%}) and no further imaging needed in 12 (45{\%}). Conclusion: Evidence and multispecialty consensus support ultrasonography or no further imaging in specific clinical scenarios, with reduced-radiation-dose CT to be used when CT is needed for patients with suspected renal colic.",
author = "Moore, {Christopher L.} and Carpenter, {Christopher R.} and Heilbrun, {Marta E.} and Kevin Klauer and Amy Krambeck and Courtney Moreno and Remer, {Erick M.} and Charles Scales and Shaw, {Melissa M.} and Sternberg, {Kevan M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.04.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "391--399",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging in Suspected Renal Colic

T2 - Systematic Review of the Literature and Multispecialty Consensus

AU - Moore, Christopher L.

AU - Carpenter, Christopher R.

AU - Heilbrun, Marta E.

AU - Klauer, Kevin

AU - Krambeck, Amy

AU - Moreno, Courtney

AU - Remer, Erick M.

AU - Scales, Charles

AU - Shaw, Melissa M.

AU - Sternberg, Kevan M.

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Study objective: Renal colic is common and computed tomography (CT) is frequently used when the diagnosis of kidney stone is suspected. CT is accurate but exposes patients to ionizing radiation and has not been shown to alter either interventional approaches or hospital admission rates. This multiorganizational transdisciplinary collaboration seeks evidence-based, multispecialty consensus on optimal imaging across different clinical scenarios in patients with suspected renal colic in the acute setting. Methods: In conjunction with the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Emergency Quality Network, we formed a 9-member panel with 3 physician representatives each from ACEP, the American College of Radiology, and the American Urology Association. A systematic literature review was used as the basis for a 3-step modified Delphi process to seek consensus on optimal imaging in 29 specific clinical scenarios. Results: From an initial search yielding 6,337 records, there were 232 relevant articles of acceptable evidence quality to guide the literature summary. At the completion of the Delphi process consensus, out of the 29 scenarios agreement was rated as perfect in 15 (52%), excellent in 8 (28%), good in 3 (10%), and moderate in 3 (10%). There were no scenarios in which at least moderate consensus was not reached. CT was recommended in 7 scenarios (24%), with ultrasonography in 9 (31%) and no further imaging needed in 12 (45%). Conclusion: Evidence and multispecialty consensus support ultrasonography or no further imaging in specific clinical scenarios, with reduced-radiation-dose CT to be used when CT is needed for patients with suspected renal colic.

AB - Study objective: Renal colic is common and computed tomography (CT) is frequently used when the diagnosis of kidney stone is suspected. CT is accurate but exposes patients to ionizing radiation and has not been shown to alter either interventional approaches or hospital admission rates. This multiorganizational transdisciplinary collaboration seeks evidence-based, multispecialty consensus on optimal imaging across different clinical scenarios in patients with suspected renal colic in the acute setting. Methods: In conjunction with the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Emergency Quality Network, we formed a 9-member panel with 3 physician representatives each from ACEP, the American College of Radiology, and the American Urology Association. A systematic literature review was used as the basis for a 3-step modified Delphi process to seek consensus on optimal imaging in 29 specific clinical scenarios. Results: From an initial search yielding 6,337 records, there were 232 relevant articles of acceptable evidence quality to guide the literature summary. At the completion of the Delphi process consensus, out of the 29 scenarios agreement was rated as perfect in 15 (52%), excellent in 8 (28%), good in 3 (10%), and moderate in 3 (10%). There were no scenarios in which at least moderate consensus was not reached. CT was recommended in 7 scenarios (24%), with ultrasonography in 9 (31%) and no further imaging needed in 12 (45%). Conclusion: Evidence and multispecialty consensus support ultrasonography or no further imaging in specific clinical scenarios, with reduced-radiation-dose CT to be used when CT is needed for patients with suspected renal colic.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070936058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070936058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.04.021

DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.04.021

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 391

EP - 399

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 3

ER -