Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures

Charles Kahi, Darren Ballard, Anand S. Shah, Raenita Mears, Cynthia S. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Colonoscopy quality is operator-dependent. Studies assessing the effect of interventions to decrease variation in colonoscopy quality have shown inconsistent results. Since 2009, endoscopists at our university- affiliated, Veterans Affairs medical center have received a quarterly "report card" summarizing individual colonoscopy quality indicators as part of an ongoing quality assurance program. Objective: To determine the effect of the quality report card intervention on colonoscopy performance. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Tertiary-care, academic, university-affiliated, Veterans Affairs medical center in Indianapolis, Indiana. Patients: Data from 6 endoscopists practicing at the Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center were included. Patients were average-risk, aged 50 years or older, undergoing their first screening colonoscopy. Intervention: Quarterly report card. The study time frame was July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 (before-intervention) and April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2011 (intervention). Main Outcome Measurements: The primary outcomes were cecal intubation and adenoma detection rates (ADR), adjusted for physician, patient age, and sex. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with adenoma detection. Results: A total of 928 patients (male 93%, white 78%) were included (before-intervention 336; intervention 592). There were no significant differences in patient age, sex, smoking status, body mass index, bowel preparation quality, colonoscope model, and proportion of colonoscopies performed with a trainee between the before-intervention and intervention phases. In the intervention phase, the adjusted adenoma detection and cecal intubation rates were significantly higher: 53.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.7%-58.1%) vs 44.7% (95% CI, 39.1%-50.4%); P =.013 and 98.1% (95% CI, 96.7%-99.0%) vs 95.6% (95% CI, 92.5%-97.5%); P =.027, respectively. A higher ADR trend in the intervention phase was found for 5 of the 6 physicians. The increment in ADR was due mostly to increased detection of proximal adenomas. There were no significant changes in serrated polyp detection, advanced neoplasm detection, number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy, and mean size of adenomas after implementation of the intervention. The report card intervention remained significantly associated with higher ADRs after adjustment for patient age, sex, and physician (odds ratio 1.45; 95% CI, 1.08-1.94). Limitations: Single center, small number of endoscopists. Conclusion: A quarterly report card was associated with improved colonoscopy quality indicators. This intervention is practical to generate and implement and may serve as a model for quality improvement programs in different patient and physician groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)925-931
Number of pages7
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume77
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Colonoscopy
Adenoma
Confidence Intervals
Veterans
Physicians
Intubation
Colonoscopes
Tertiary Healthcare
Quality Improvement
Polyps
Body Mass Index
Retrospective Studies
Logistic Models
Smoking
Odds Ratio

Keywords

  • adenoma detection rate
  • ADR
  • colorectal cancer
  • CRC

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures. / Kahi, Charles; Ballard, Darren; Shah, Anand S.; Mears, Raenita; Johnson, Cynthia S.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 77, No. 6, 06.2013, p. 925-931.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kahi, Charles ; Ballard, Darren ; Shah, Anand S. ; Mears, Raenita ; Johnson, Cynthia S. / Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2013 ; Vol. 77, No. 6. pp. 925-931.
@article{92a45bf3d72b4e679b1139b9d5383cca,
title = "Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures",
abstract = "Background: Colonoscopy quality is operator-dependent. Studies assessing the effect of interventions to decrease variation in colonoscopy quality have shown inconsistent results. Since 2009, endoscopists at our university- affiliated, Veterans Affairs medical center have received a quarterly {"}report card{"} summarizing individual colonoscopy quality indicators as part of an ongoing quality assurance program. Objective: To determine the effect of the quality report card intervention on colonoscopy performance. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Tertiary-care, academic, university-affiliated, Veterans Affairs medical center in Indianapolis, Indiana. Patients: Data from 6 endoscopists practicing at the Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center were included. Patients were average-risk, aged 50 years or older, undergoing their first screening colonoscopy. Intervention: Quarterly report card. The study time frame was July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 (before-intervention) and April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2011 (intervention). Main Outcome Measurements: The primary outcomes were cecal intubation and adenoma detection rates (ADR), adjusted for physician, patient age, and sex. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with adenoma detection. Results: A total of 928 patients (male 93{\%}, white 78{\%}) were included (before-intervention 336; intervention 592). There were no significant differences in patient age, sex, smoking status, body mass index, bowel preparation quality, colonoscope model, and proportion of colonoscopies performed with a trainee between the before-intervention and intervention phases. In the intervention phase, the adjusted adenoma detection and cecal intubation rates were significantly higher: 53.9{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 49.7{\%}-58.1{\%}) vs 44.7{\%} (95{\%} CI, 39.1{\%}-50.4{\%}); P =.013 and 98.1{\%} (95{\%} CI, 96.7{\%}-99.0{\%}) vs 95.6{\%} (95{\%} CI, 92.5{\%}-97.5{\%}); P =.027, respectively. A higher ADR trend in the intervention phase was found for 5 of the 6 physicians. The increment in ADR was due mostly to increased detection of proximal adenomas. There were no significant changes in serrated polyp detection, advanced neoplasm detection, number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy, and mean size of adenomas after implementation of the intervention. The report card intervention remained significantly associated with higher ADRs after adjustment for patient age, sex, and physician (odds ratio 1.45; 95{\%} CI, 1.08-1.94). Limitations: Single center, small number of endoscopists. Conclusion: A quarterly report card was associated with improved colonoscopy quality indicators. This intervention is practical to generate and implement and may serve as a model for quality improvement programs in different patient and physician groups.",
keywords = "adenoma detection rate, ADR, colorectal cancer, CRC",
author = "Charles Kahi and Darren Ballard and Shah, {Anand S.} and Raenita Mears and Johnson, {Cynthia S.}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.012",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "925--931",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures

AU - Kahi, Charles

AU - Ballard, Darren

AU - Shah, Anand S.

AU - Mears, Raenita

AU - Johnson, Cynthia S.

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Background: Colonoscopy quality is operator-dependent. Studies assessing the effect of interventions to decrease variation in colonoscopy quality have shown inconsistent results. Since 2009, endoscopists at our university- affiliated, Veterans Affairs medical center have received a quarterly "report card" summarizing individual colonoscopy quality indicators as part of an ongoing quality assurance program. Objective: To determine the effect of the quality report card intervention on colonoscopy performance. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Tertiary-care, academic, university-affiliated, Veterans Affairs medical center in Indianapolis, Indiana. Patients: Data from 6 endoscopists practicing at the Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center were included. Patients were average-risk, aged 50 years or older, undergoing their first screening colonoscopy. Intervention: Quarterly report card. The study time frame was July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 (before-intervention) and April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2011 (intervention). Main Outcome Measurements: The primary outcomes were cecal intubation and adenoma detection rates (ADR), adjusted for physician, patient age, and sex. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with adenoma detection. Results: A total of 928 patients (male 93%, white 78%) were included (before-intervention 336; intervention 592). There were no significant differences in patient age, sex, smoking status, body mass index, bowel preparation quality, colonoscope model, and proportion of colonoscopies performed with a trainee between the before-intervention and intervention phases. In the intervention phase, the adjusted adenoma detection and cecal intubation rates were significantly higher: 53.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.7%-58.1%) vs 44.7% (95% CI, 39.1%-50.4%); P =.013 and 98.1% (95% CI, 96.7%-99.0%) vs 95.6% (95% CI, 92.5%-97.5%); P =.027, respectively. A higher ADR trend in the intervention phase was found for 5 of the 6 physicians. The increment in ADR was due mostly to increased detection of proximal adenomas. There were no significant changes in serrated polyp detection, advanced neoplasm detection, number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy, and mean size of adenomas after implementation of the intervention. The report card intervention remained significantly associated with higher ADRs after adjustment for patient age, sex, and physician (odds ratio 1.45; 95% CI, 1.08-1.94). Limitations: Single center, small number of endoscopists. Conclusion: A quarterly report card was associated with improved colonoscopy quality indicators. This intervention is practical to generate and implement and may serve as a model for quality improvement programs in different patient and physician groups.

AB - Background: Colonoscopy quality is operator-dependent. Studies assessing the effect of interventions to decrease variation in colonoscopy quality have shown inconsistent results. Since 2009, endoscopists at our university- affiliated, Veterans Affairs medical center have received a quarterly "report card" summarizing individual colonoscopy quality indicators as part of an ongoing quality assurance program. Objective: To determine the effect of the quality report card intervention on colonoscopy performance. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Tertiary-care, academic, university-affiliated, Veterans Affairs medical center in Indianapolis, Indiana. Patients: Data from 6 endoscopists practicing at the Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center were included. Patients were average-risk, aged 50 years or older, undergoing their first screening colonoscopy. Intervention: Quarterly report card. The study time frame was July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 (before-intervention) and April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2011 (intervention). Main Outcome Measurements: The primary outcomes were cecal intubation and adenoma detection rates (ADR), adjusted for physician, patient age, and sex. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with adenoma detection. Results: A total of 928 patients (male 93%, white 78%) were included (before-intervention 336; intervention 592). There were no significant differences in patient age, sex, smoking status, body mass index, bowel preparation quality, colonoscope model, and proportion of colonoscopies performed with a trainee between the before-intervention and intervention phases. In the intervention phase, the adjusted adenoma detection and cecal intubation rates were significantly higher: 53.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.7%-58.1%) vs 44.7% (95% CI, 39.1%-50.4%); P =.013 and 98.1% (95% CI, 96.7%-99.0%) vs 95.6% (95% CI, 92.5%-97.5%); P =.027, respectively. A higher ADR trend in the intervention phase was found for 5 of the 6 physicians. The increment in ADR was due mostly to increased detection of proximal adenomas. There were no significant changes in serrated polyp detection, advanced neoplasm detection, number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy, and mean size of adenomas after implementation of the intervention. The report card intervention remained significantly associated with higher ADRs after adjustment for patient age, sex, and physician (odds ratio 1.45; 95% CI, 1.08-1.94). Limitations: Single center, small number of endoscopists. Conclusion: A quarterly report card was associated with improved colonoscopy quality indicators. This intervention is practical to generate and implement and may serve as a model for quality improvement programs in different patient and physician groups.

KW - adenoma detection rate

KW - ADR

KW - colorectal cancer

KW - CRC

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877928147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877928147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.012

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.012

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 925

EP - 931

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 6

ER -