Impact of a rapid rule-out protocol for pulmonary embolism on the rate of screening, missed cases, and pulmonary vascular imaging in an urban US emergency department

Jeffrey Kline, William B. Webb, Alan E. Jones, Jackeline Hernandez-Nino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study tests the hypothesis that implementation of a point-of-care emergency department (ED) protocol to rule out pulmonary embolism would increase the rate of evaluation without increasing the rate of pulmonary vascular imaging or ED length of stay and that less than 1.0% of patients with a negative protocol would have an adverse outcome. A baseline study was conducted on patients with suspected pulmonary embolism at an urban ED to establish baseline measurements performed when only pulmonary vascular imaging was available to rule out pulmonary embolism. The intervention protocol used pretest probability assessment, a whole-blood d-dimer assay, and an alveolar dead-space measurement to rule out pulmonary embolism. The main outcomes were diagnosis of venous thromboembolism or sudden unexpected death within 90 days. During baseline, 453 of 61,322 patients (0.74%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67% to 0.81%) underwent pulmonary vascular imaging, and 8% (95% CI 6% to 11%) of scan results were positive; 1.20% (95% CI 0.39% to 2.78%) of untreated discharged patients were anticoagulated for venous thromboembolism or died unexpectedly within 90 days. The median length of stay was 385 minutes. After intervention, 1,460 of 102,848 patients (1.42%; 95% CI 1.35% to 1.49%) were evaluated for pulmonary embolism. Seven hundred fifty-two patients had a negative protocol and 5 of 752 (0.66%; 95% CI 0.20% to 1.54%) had venous thromboembolism within 90 days, none with unexpected death. After intervention, the rate of pulmonary vascular imaging tended to decrease (0.64%; 95% CI 0.59% to 0.69%), and more scans (11%; 95% CI 9% to 14%) were read as positive; the length of stay decreased to 297 minutes. A point-of-care pulmonary embolism rule-out protocol doubled the rate of screening for pulmonary embolism in the ED, had a false negative rate of less than 1.0%, did not increase the pulmonary vascular imaging rate, and decreased length of stay.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)490-502
Number of pages13
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pulmonary Embolism
Blood Vessels
Hospital Emergency Service
Confidence Intervals
Lung
Length of Stay
Venous Thromboembolism
Point-of-Care Systems
Sudden Death

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Impact of a rapid rule-out protocol for pulmonary embolism on the rate of screening, missed cases, and pulmonary vascular imaging in an urban US emergency department. / Kline, Jeffrey; Webb, William B.; Jones, Alan E.; Hernandez-Nino, Jackeline.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 44, No. 5, 11.2004, p. 490-502.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8af0be4dec9647c8b3afb1cbebf2cdf2,
title = "Impact of a rapid rule-out protocol for pulmonary embolism on the rate of screening, missed cases, and pulmonary vascular imaging in an urban US emergency department",
abstract = "This study tests the hypothesis that implementation of a point-of-care emergency department (ED) protocol to rule out pulmonary embolism would increase the rate of evaluation without increasing the rate of pulmonary vascular imaging or ED length of stay and that less than 1.0{\%} of patients with a negative protocol would have an adverse outcome. A baseline study was conducted on patients with suspected pulmonary embolism at an urban ED to establish baseline measurements performed when only pulmonary vascular imaging was available to rule out pulmonary embolism. The intervention protocol used pretest probability assessment, a whole-blood d-dimer assay, and an alveolar dead-space measurement to rule out pulmonary embolism. The main outcomes were diagnosis of venous thromboembolism or sudden unexpected death within 90 days. During baseline, 453 of 61,322 patients (0.74{\%}; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 0.67{\%} to 0.81{\%}) underwent pulmonary vascular imaging, and 8{\%} (95{\%} CI 6{\%} to 11{\%}) of scan results were positive; 1.20{\%} (95{\%} CI 0.39{\%} to 2.78{\%}) of untreated discharged patients were anticoagulated for venous thromboembolism or died unexpectedly within 90 days. The median length of stay was 385 minutes. After intervention, 1,460 of 102,848 patients (1.42{\%}; 95{\%} CI 1.35{\%} to 1.49{\%}) were evaluated for pulmonary embolism. Seven hundred fifty-two patients had a negative protocol and 5 of 752 (0.66{\%}; 95{\%} CI 0.20{\%} to 1.54{\%}) had venous thromboembolism within 90 days, none with unexpected death. After intervention, the rate of pulmonary vascular imaging tended to decrease (0.64{\%}; 95{\%} CI 0.59{\%} to 0.69{\%}), and more scans (11{\%}; 95{\%} CI 9{\%} to 14{\%}) were read as positive; the length of stay decreased to 297 minutes. A point-of-care pulmonary embolism rule-out protocol doubled the rate of screening for pulmonary embolism in the ED, had a false negative rate of less than 1.0{\%}, did not increase the pulmonary vascular imaging rate, and decreased length of stay.",
author = "Jeffrey Kline and Webb, {William B.} and Jones, {Alan E.} and Jackeline Hernandez-Nino",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.03.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "490--502",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of a rapid rule-out protocol for pulmonary embolism on the rate of screening, missed cases, and pulmonary vascular imaging in an urban US emergency department

AU - Kline, Jeffrey

AU - Webb, William B.

AU - Jones, Alan E.

AU - Hernandez-Nino, Jackeline

PY - 2004/11

Y1 - 2004/11

N2 - This study tests the hypothesis that implementation of a point-of-care emergency department (ED) protocol to rule out pulmonary embolism would increase the rate of evaluation without increasing the rate of pulmonary vascular imaging or ED length of stay and that less than 1.0% of patients with a negative protocol would have an adverse outcome. A baseline study was conducted on patients with suspected pulmonary embolism at an urban ED to establish baseline measurements performed when only pulmonary vascular imaging was available to rule out pulmonary embolism. The intervention protocol used pretest probability assessment, a whole-blood d-dimer assay, and an alveolar dead-space measurement to rule out pulmonary embolism. The main outcomes were diagnosis of venous thromboembolism or sudden unexpected death within 90 days. During baseline, 453 of 61,322 patients (0.74%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67% to 0.81%) underwent pulmonary vascular imaging, and 8% (95% CI 6% to 11%) of scan results were positive; 1.20% (95% CI 0.39% to 2.78%) of untreated discharged patients were anticoagulated for venous thromboembolism or died unexpectedly within 90 days. The median length of stay was 385 minutes. After intervention, 1,460 of 102,848 patients (1.42%; 95% CI 1.35% to 1.49%) were evaluated for pulmonary embolism. Seven hundred fifty-two patients had a negative protocol and 5 of 752 (0.66%; 95% CI 0.20% to 1.54%) had venous thromboembolism within 90 days, none with unexpected death. After intervention, the rate of pulmonary vascular imaging tended to decrease (0.64%; 95% CI 0.59% to 0.69%), and more scans (11%; 95% CI 9% to 14%) were read as positive; the length of stay decreased to 297 minutes. A point-of-care pulmonary embolism rule-out protocol doubled the rate of screening for pulmonary embolism in the ED, had a false negative rate of less than 1.0%, did not increase the pulmonary vascular imaging rate, and decreased length of stay.

AB - This study tests the hypothesis that implementation of a point-of-care emergency department (ED) protocol to rule out pulmonary embolism would increase the rate of evaluation without increasing the rate of pulmonary vascular imaging or ED length of stay and that less than 1.0% of patients with a negative protocol would have an adverse outcome. A baseline study was conducted on patients with suspected pulmonary embolism at an urban ED to establish baseline measurements performed when only pulmonary vascular imaging was available to rule out pulmonary embolism. The intervention protocol used pretest probability assessment, a whole-blood d-dimer assay, and an alveolar dead-space measurement to rule out pulmonary embolism. The main outcomes were diagnosis of venous thromboembolism or sudden unexpected death within 90 days. During baseline, 453 of 61,322 patients (0.74%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67% to 0.81%) underwent pulmonary vascular imaging, and 8% (95% CI 6% to 11%) of scan results were positive; 1.20% (95% CI 0.39% to 2.78%) of untreated discharged patients were anticoagulated for venous thromboembolism or died unexpectedly within 90 days. The median length of stay was 385 minutes. After intervention, 1,460 of 102,848 patients (1.42%; 95% CI 1.35% to 1.49%) were evaluated for pulmonary embolism. Seven hundred fifty-two patients had a negative protocol and 5 of 752 (0.66%; 95% CI 0.20% to 1.54%) had venous thromboembolism within 90 days, none with unexpected death. After intervention, the rate of pulmonary vascular imaging tended to decrease (0.64%; 95% CI 0.59% to 0.69%), and more scans (11%; 95% CI 9% to 14%) were read as positive; the length of stay decreased to 297 minutes. A point-of-care pulmonary embolism rule-out protocol doubled the rate of screening for pulmonary embolism in the ED, had a false negative rate of less than 1.0%, did not increase the pulmonary vascular imaging rate, and decreased length of stay.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7044237588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7044237588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.03.018

DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.03.018

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 490

EP - 502

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 5

ER -