Impact of rectal balloon-filling materials on the dosimetry of prostate and organs at risk in photon beam therapy

Shiv P. Srivastava, Indra J. Das, Arvind Kumar, Peter A S Johnstone, Chee Wai Cheng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of rectal balloon in radiotherapy of prostate cancer is shown to be effective in reducing prostate motion andminimizing rectal volume, thus reducing rectal toxicity. Air-filled rectal balloon has been used most commonly, but creates dose perturbation at the air-tissue interface. In this study, we evaluate the effects of rectal balloon-filling materials on the dose distribution to the target and organs at risk. The dosimetric impact of rectal balloon filling was studied in detail for a typical prostate patient, and the general effect of the balloon filling was investigated from a study of ten prostate patients covering a wide range of anterior-posterior and left-right separations, as well as rectal and bladder volumes. Hounsfield units (HU) of the rectal balloon filling was changed from -1000 HU to 1000 HU at an interval of 250 HU, and the corresponding changes in the relative electron density (RED) was calculated. For each of the HU of the rectal balloon filling, a seven-field IMRT plan was generated with 6 MV and 15 MV photon beams, respectively. Dosimetric evaluationwas performed with the AAA algorithm for inhomogeneity corrections. A detailed study of the rectal balloon filling shows that the GTV, PTV, rectal, and bladder mean dose decreased with increasing values of RED in the rectal balloon. There is significant underdosage in the target volume at the rectum-prostate interface with an air-filled balloon as compared to thatwith a water-filled balloon for both 6 MV and 15 MV beams. While the dosimetric effect of the rectal balloon filling is reduced when averaged over ten patients, generally an air-filled balloon results in lower minimum dose and lower mean dose in the overlap region (and possibly the PTV) compared to those produced by water-filled or contrast-filled balloons. Dose inhomogeneity in the target volume is increased with an air-filled rectal balloon. Thus a water-filled or contrast-filled rectal balloon is preferred to an air-filled rectal balloon in EBRT of prostate treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-91
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Volume14
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Organs at Risk
Balloons
photon beams
balloons
Photons
organs
Dosimetry
dosimeters
Prostate
therapy
Air
Specific Gravity
Water
Urinary Bladder
Therapeutics
Electrons
dosage
air
Rectum
Prostatic Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Dosimetry
  • IMRT
  • Rectal balloon

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiation
  • Instrumentation

Cite this

Srivastava, S. P., Das, I. J., Kumar, A., Johnstone, P. A. S., & Cheng, C. W. (2013). Impact of rectal balloon-filling materials on the dosimetry of prostate and organs at risk in photon beam therapy. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 14(1), 81-91.

Impact of rectal balloon-filling materials on the dosimetry of prostate and organs at risk in photon beam therapy. / Srivastava, Shiv P.; Das, Indra J.; Kumar, Arvind; Johnstone, Peter A S; Cheng, Chee Wai.

In: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2013, p. 81-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Srivastava, Shiv P. ; Das, Indra J. ; Kumar, Arvind ; Johnstone, Peter A S ; Cheng, Chee Wai. / Impact of rectal balloon-filling materials on the dosimetry of prostate and organs at risk in photon beam therapy. In: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2013 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 81-91.
@article{e851ad2a9ba8476fad754d2f7a34bbaa,
title = "Impact of rectal balloon-filling materials on the dosimetry of prostate and organs at risk in photon beam therapy",
abstract = "The use of rectal balloon in radiotherapy of prostate cancer is shown to be effective in reducing prostate motion andminimizing rectal volume, thus reducing rectal toxicity. Air-filled rectal balloon has been used most commonly, but creates dose perturbation at the air-tissue interface. In this study, we evaluate the effects of rectal balloon-filling materials on the dose distribution to the target and organs at risk. The dosimetric impact of rectal balloon filling was studied in detail for a typical prostate patient, and the general effect of the balloon filling was investigated from a study of ten prostate patients covering a wide range of anterior-posterior and left-right separations, as well as rectal and bladder volumes. Hounsfield units (HU) of the rectal balloon filling was changed from -1000 HU to 1000 HU at an interval of 250 HU, and the corresponding changes in the relative electron density (RED) was calculated. For each of the HU of the rectal balloon filling, a seven-field IMRT plan was generated with 6 MV and 15 MV photon beams, respectively. Dosimetric evaluationwas performed with the AAA algorithm for inhomogeneity corrections. A detailed study of the rectal balloon filling shows that the GTV, PTV, rectal, and bladder mean dose decreased with increasing values of RED in the rectal balloon. There is significant underdosage in the target volume at the rectum-prostate interface with an air-filled balloon as compared to thatwith a water-filled balloon for both 6 MV and 15 MV beams. While the dosimetric effect of the rectal balloon filling is reduced when averaged over ten patients, generally an air-filled balloon results in lower minimum dose and lower mean dose in the overlap region (and possibly the PTV) compared to those produced by water-filled or contrast-filled balloons. Dose inhomogeneity in the target volume is increased with an air-filled rectal balloon. Thus a water-filled or contrast-filled rectal balloon is preferred to an air-filled rectal balloon in EBRT of prostate treatment.",
keywords = "Dosimetry, IMRT, Rectal balloon",
author = "Srivastava, {Shiv P.} and Das, {Indra J.} and Arvind Kumar and Johnstone, {Peter A S} and Cheng, {Chee Wai}",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "81--91",
journal = "Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics",
issn = "1526-9914",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of rectal balloon-filling materials on the dosimetry of prostate and organs at risk in photon beam therapy

AU - Srivastava, Shiv P.

AU - Das, Indra J.

AU - Kumar, Arvind

AU - Johnstone, Peter A S

AU - Cheng, Chee Wai

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The use of rectal balloon in radiotherapy of prostate cancer is shown to be effective in reducing prostate motion andminimizing rectal volume, thus reducing rectal toxicity. Air-filled rectal balloon has been used most commonly, but creates dose perturbation at the air-tissue interface. In this study, we evaluate the effects of rectal balloon-filling materials on the dose distribution to the target and organs at risk. The dosimetric impact of rectal balloon filling was studied in detail for a typical prostate patient, and the general effect of the balloon filling was investigated from a study of ten prostate patients covering a wide range of anterior-posterior and left-right separations, as well as rectal and bladder volumes. Hounsfield units (HU) of the rectal balloon filling was changed from -1000 HU to 1000 HU at an interval of 250 HU, and the corresponding changes in the relative electron density (RED) was calculated. For each of the HU of the rectal balloon filling, a seven-field IMRT plan was generated with 6 MV and 15 MV photon beams, respectively. Dosimetric evaluationwas performed with the AAA algorithm for inhomogeneity corrections. A detailed study of the rectal balloon filling shows that the GTV, PTV, rectal, and bladder mean dose decreased with increasing values of RED in the rectal balloon. There is significant underdosage in the target volume at the rectum-prostate interface with an air-filled balloon as compared to thatwith a water-filled balloon for both 6 MV and 15 MV beams. While the dosimetric effect of the rectal balloon filling is reduced when averaged over ten patients, generally an air-filled balloon results in lower minimum dose and lower mean dose in the overlap region (and possibly the PTV) compared to those produced by water-filled or contrast-filled balloons. Dose inhomogeneity in the target volume is increased with an air-filled rectal balloon. Thus a water-filled or contrast-filled rectal balloon is preferred to an air-filled rectal balloon in EBRT of prostate treatment.

AB - The use of rectal balloon in radiotherapy of prostate cancer is shown to be effective in reducing prostate motion andminimizing rectal volume, thus reducing rectal toxicity. Air-filled rectal balloon has been used most commonly, but creates dose perturbation at the air-tissue interface. In this study, we evaluate the effects of rectal balloon-filling materials on the dose distribution to the target and organs at risk. The dosimetric impact of rectal balloon filling was studied in detail for a typical prostate patient, and the general effect of the balloon filling was investigated from a study of ten prostate patients covering a wide range of anterior-posterior and left-right separations, as well as rectal and bladder volumes. Hounsfield units (HU) of the rectal balloon filling was changed from -1000 HU to 1000 HU at an interval of 250 HU, and the corresponding changes in the relative electron density (RED) was calculated. For each of the HU of the rectal balloon filling, a seven-field IMRT plan was generated with 6 MV and 15 MV photon beams, respectively. Dosimetric evaluationwas performed with the AAA algorithm for inhomogeneity corrections. A detailed study of the rectal balloon filling shows that the GTV, PTV, rectal, and bladder mean dose decreased with increasing values of RED in the rectal balloon. There is significant underdosage in the target volume at the rectum-prostate interface with an air-filled balloon as compared to thatwith a water-filled balloon for both 6 MV and 15 MV beams. While the dosimetric effect of the rectal balloon filling is reduced when averaged over ten patients, generally an air-filled balloon results in lower minimum dose and lower mean dose in the overlap region (and possibly the PTV) compared to those produced by water-filled or contrast-filled balloons. Dose inhomogeneity in the target volume is increased with an air-filled rectal balloon. Thus a water-filled or contrast-filled rectal balloon is preferred to an air-filled rectal balloon in EBRT of prostate treatment.

KW - Dosimetry

KW - IMRT

KW - Rectal balloon

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873545686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873545686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84873545686

VL - 14

SP - 81

EP - 91

JO - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

JF - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

SN - 1526-9914

IS - 1

ER -