Impact of the HITECH act on physicians' adoption of electronic health records

Stephen T. Mennemeyer, Nir Menachemi, Saurabh Rahurkar, Eric W. Ford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objective: The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act has distributed billions of dollars to physicians as incentives for adopting certified electronic health records (EHRs) through the meaningful use (MU) program ultimately aimed at improving healthcare outcomes. The authors examine the extent to which the MU program impacted the EHR adoption curve that existed prior to the Act. Methods: Bass and Gamma Shifted Gompertz (G/SG) diffusion models of the adoption of "Any" and "Basic" EHR systems in physicians' offices using consistent data series covering 2001-2013 and 2006-2013, respectively, are estimated to determine if adoption was stimulated during either a PrePay (2009-2010) period of subsidy anticipation or a PostPay (2011-2013) period when payments were actually made. Results: Adoption of Any EHR system may have increased by as much as 7 percentage points above the level predicted in the absence of the MU subsidies. This estimate, however, lacks statistical significance and becomes smaller or negative under alternative model specifications. No substantial effects are found for Basic systems. The models suggest that adoption was largely driven by "imitation" effects (q-coefficient) as physicians mimic their peers' technology use or respond to mandates. Small and often insignificant "innovation" effects (p-coefficient) are found suggesting little enthusiasm by physicians who are leaders in technology adoption. Conclusion: The authors find weak evidence of the impact of the MU program on EHR uptake. This is consistent with reports that many current EHR systems reduce physician productivity, lack data sharing capabilities, and need to incorporate other key interoperability features (e.g., application program interfaces).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)375-379
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
Electronic Health Records
Physicians
Technology
Bass
Physicians' Offices
Information Dissemination
Motivation
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • American recovery and reinvestment act
  • Bass model
  • Electronic health records
  • Health information technology
  • Technology adoption

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Impact of the HITECH act on physicians' adoption of electronic health records. / Mennemeyer, Stephen T.; Menachemi, Nir; Rahurkar, Saurabh; Ford, Eric W.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 23, No. 2, 01.03.2016, p. 375-379.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mennemeyer, Stephen T. ; Menachemi, Nir ; Rahurkar, Saurabh ; Ford, Eric W. / Impact of the HITECH act on physicians' adoption of electronic health records. In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2016 ; Vol. 23, No. 2. pp. 375-379.
@article{6bf1534b409a4c20a39af800031c4bf3,
title = "Impact of the HITECH act on physicians' adoption of electronic health records",
abstract = "Background and Objective: The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act has distributed billions of dollars to physicians as incentives for adopting certified electronic health records (EHRs) through the meaningful use (MU) program ultimately aimed at improving healthcare outcomes. The authors examine the extent to which the MU program impacted the EHR adoption curve that existed prior to the Act. Methods: Bass and Gamma Shifted Gompertz (G/SG) diffusion models of the adoption of {"}Any{"} and {"}Basic{"} EHR systems in physicians' offices using consistent data series covering 2001-2013 and 2006-2013, respectively, are estimated to determine if adoption was stimulated during either a PrePay (2009-2010) period of subsidy anticipation or a PostPay (2011-2013) period when payments were actually made. Results: Adoption of Any EHR system may have increased by as much as 7 percentage points above the level predicted in the absence of the MU subsidies. This estimate, however, lacks statistical significance and becomes smaller or negative under alternative model specifications. No substantial effects are found for Basic systems. The models suggest that adoption was largely driven by {"}imitation{"} effects (q-coefficient) as physicians mimic their peers' technology use or respond to mandates. Small and often insignificant {"}innovation{"} effects (p-coefficient) are found suggesting little enthusiasm by physicians who are leaders in technology adoption. Conclusion: The authors find weak evidence of the impact of the MU program on EHR uptake. This is consistent with reports that many current EHR systems reduce physician productivity, lack data sharing capabilities, and need to incorporate other key interoperability features (e.g., application program interfaces).",
keywords = "American recovery and reinvestment act, Bass model, Electronic health records, Health information technology, Technology adoption",
author = "Mennemeyer, {Stephen T.} and Nir Menachemi and Saurabh Rahurkar and Ford, {Eric W.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jamia/ocv103",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "375--379",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of the HITECH act on physicians' adoption of electronic health records

AU - Mennemeyer, Stephen T.

AU - Menachemi, Nir

AU - Rahurkar, Saurabh

AU - Ford, Eric W.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Background and Objective: The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act has distributed billions of dollars to physicians as incentives for adopting certified electronic health records (EHRs) through the meaningful use (MU) program ultimately aimed at improving healthcare outcomes. The authors examine the extent to which the MU program impacted the EHR adoption curve that existed prior to the Act. Methods: Bass and Gamma Shifted Gompertz (G/SG) diffusion models of the adoption of "Any" and "Basic" EHR systems in physicians' offices using consistent data series covering 2001-2013 and 2006-2013, respectively, are estimated to determine if adoption was stimulated during either a PrePay (2009-2010) period of subsidy anticipation or a PostPay (2011-2013) period when payments were actually made. Results: Adoption of Any EHR system may have increased by as much as 7 percentage points above the level predicted in the absence of the MU subsidies. This estimate, however, lacks statistical significance and becomes smaller or negative under alternative model specifications. No substantial effects are found for Basic systems. The models suggest that adoption was largely driven by "imitation" effects (q-coefficient) as physicians mimic their peers' technology use or respond to mandates. Small and often insignificant "innovation" effects (p-coefficient) are found suggesting little enthusiasm by physicians who are leaders in technology adoption. Conclusion: The authors find weak evidence of the impact of the MU program on EHR uptake. This is consistent with reports that many current EHR systems reduce physician productivity, lack data sharing capabilities, and need to incorporate other key interoperability features (e.g., application program interfaces).

AB - Background and Objective: The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act has distributed billions of dollars to physicians as incentives for adopting certified electronic health records (EHRs) through the meaningful use (MU) program ultimately aimed at improving healthcare outcomes. The authors examine the extent to which the MU program impacted the EHR adoption curve that existed prior to the Act. Methods: Bass and Gamma Shifted Gompertz (G/SG) diffusion models of the adoption of "Any" and "Basic" EHR systems in physicians' offices using consistent data series covering 2001-2013 and 2006-2013, respectively, are estimated to determine if adoption was stimulated during either a PrePay (2009-2010) period of subsidy anticipation or a PostPay (2011-2013) period when payments were actually made. Results: Adoption of Any EHR system may have increased by as much as 7 percentage points above the level predicted in the absence of the MU subsidies. This estimate, however, lacks statistical significance and becomes smaller or negative under alternative model specifications. No substantial effects are found for Basic systems. The models suggest that adoption was largely driven by "imitation" effects (q-coefficient) as physicians mimic their peers' technology use or respond to mandates. Small and often insignificant "innovation" effects (p-coefficient) are found suggesting little enthusiasm by physicians who are leaders in technology adoption. Conclusion: The authors find weak evidence of the impact of the MU program on EHR uptake. This is consistent with reports that many current EHR systems reduce physician productivity, lack data sharing capabilities, and need to incorporate other key interoperability features (e.g., application program interfaces).

KW - American recovery and reinvestment act

KW - Bass model

KW - Electronic health records

KW - Health information technology

KW - Technology adoption

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963783001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963783001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jamia/ocv103

DO - 10.1093/jamia/ocv103

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 375

EP - 379

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 2

ER -