Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Behavioral Health: A Review

Cara C. Lewis, Meredith Boyd, Ajeng Puspitasari, Elena Navarro, Jacqueline Howard, Hannah Kassab, Mira Hoffman, Kelli Scott, Aaron Lyon, Susan Douglas, Greg Simon, Kurt Kroenke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Importance: Measurement-based care (MBC) is the systematic evaluation of patient symptoms before or during an encounter to inform behavioral health treatment. Despite MBC's demonstrated ability to enhance usual care by expediting improvements and rapidly detecting patients whose health would otherwise deteriorate, it is underused, with typically less than 20% of behavioral health practitioners integrating it into their practice. This narrative review addresses definitional issues, offers a concrete and evaluable operationalization of MBC fidelity, and summarizes the evidence base and utility of MBC. It also synthesizes the extant literature's characterization of barriers to and strategies for supporting MBC implementation, sustainment, and scale-up. Observations: Barriers to implementing MBC occur at multiple levels: patient (eg, concerns about confidentiality breach), practitioner (eg, beliefs that measures are no better than clinical judgment), organization (eg, no resources for training), and system (eg, competing requirements). Implementation science - the study of methods to integrate evidence-based practices such as MBC into routine care - offers strategies to address barriers. These strategies include using measurement feedback systems, leveraging local champions, forming learning collaboratives, training leadership, improving expert consultation with clinical staff, and generating incentives. Conclusions and Relevance: This narrative review, informed by implementation science, offers a 10-point research agenda to improve the integration of MBC into clinical practice: (1) harmonize terminology and specify MBC's core components; (2) develop criterion standard methods for monitoring fidelity and reporting quality of implementation; (3) develop algorithms for MBC to guide psychotherapy; (4) test putative mechanisms of change, particularly for psychotherapy; (5) develop brief and psychometrically strong measures for use in combination; (6) assess the critical timing of administration needed to optimize patient outcomes; (7) streamline measurement feedback systems to include only key ingredients and enhance electronic health record interoperability; (8) identify discrete strategies to support implementation; (9) make evidence-based policy decisions; and (10) align reimbursement structures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJAMA Psychiatry
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health
Psychotherapy
Aptitude
Symptom Assessment
Electronic Health Records
Evidence-Based Practice
Confidentiality
Terminology
Motivation
Referral and Consultation
Learning
Organizations
Research
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Lewis, C. C., Boyd, M., Puspitasari, A., Navarro, E., Howard, J., Kassab, H., ... Kroenke, K. (Accepted/In press). Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Behavioral Health: A Review. JAMA Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3329

Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Behavioral Health : A Review. / Lewis, Cara C.; Boyd, Meredith; Puspitasari, Ajeng; Navarro, Elena; Howard, Jacqueline; Kassab, Hannah; Hoffman, Mira; Scott, Kelli; Lyon, Aaron; Douglas, Susan; Simon, Greg; Kroenke, Kurt.

In: JAMA Psychiatry, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lewis, CC, Boyd, M, Puspitasari, A, Navarro, E, Howard, J, Kassab, H, Hoffman, M, Scott, K, Lyon, A, Douglas, S, Simon, G & Kroenke, K 2018, 'Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Behavioral Health: A Review', JAMA Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3329
Lewis CC, Boyd M, Puspitasari A, Navarro E, Howard J, Kassab H et al. Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Behavioral Health: A Review. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jan 1. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3329
Lewis, Cara C. ; Boyd, Meredith ; Puspitasari, Ajeng ; Navarro, Elena ; Howard, Jacqueline ; Kassab, Hannah ; Hoffman, Mira ; Scott, Kelli ; Lyon, Aaron ; Douglas, Susan ; Simon, Greg ; Kroenke, Kurt. / Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Behavioral Health : A Review. In: JAMA Psychiatry. 2018.
@article{9eeed3c2163d4b4cbd19f90e956e929c,
title = "Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Behavioral Health: A Review",
abstract = "Importance: Measurement-based care (MBC) is the systematic evaluation of patient symptoms before or during an encounter to inform behavioral health treatment. Despite MBC's demonstrated ability to enhance usual care by expediting improvements and rapidly detecting patients whose health would otherwise deteriorate, it is underused, with typically less than 20{\%} of behavioral health practitioners integrating it into their practice. This narrative review addresses definitional issues, offers a concrete and evaluable operationalization of MBC fidelity, and summarizes the evidence base and utility of MBC. It also synthesizes the extant literature's characterization of barriers to and strategies for supporting MBC implementation, sustainment, and scale-up. Observations: Barriers to implementing MBC occur at multiple levels: patient (eg, concerns about confidentiality breach), practitioner (eg, beliefs that measures are no better than clinical judgment), organization (eg, no resources for training), and system (eg, competing requirements). Implementation science - the study of methods to integrate evidence-based practices such as MBC into routine care - offers strategies to address barriers. These strategies include using measurement feedback systems, leveraging local champions, forming learning collaboratives, training leadership, improving expert consultation with clinical staff, and generating incentives. Conclusions and Relevance: This narrative review, informed by implementation science, offers a 10-point research agenda to improve the integration of MBC into clinical practice: (1) harmonize terminology and specify MBC's core components; (2) develop criterion standard methods for monitoring fidelity and reporting quality of implementation; (3) develop algorithms for MBC to guide psychotherapy; (4) test putative mechanisms of change, particularly for psychotherapy; (5) develop brief and psychometrically strong measures for use in combination; (6) assess the critical timing of administration needed to optimize patient outcomes; (7) streamline measurement feedback systems to include only key ingredients and enhance electronic health record interoperability; (8) identify discrete strategies to support implementation; (9) make evidence-based policy decisions; and (10) align reimbursement structures.",
author = "Lewis, {Cara C.} and Meredith Boyd and Ajeng Puspitasari and Elena Navarro and Jacqueline Howard and Hannah Kassab and Mira Hoffman and Kelli Scott and Aaron Lyon and Susan Douglas and Greg Simon and Kurt Kroenke",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3329",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "JAMA Psychiatry",
issn = "2168-622X",
publisher = "American Medical Association",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Behavioral Health

T2 - A Review

AU - Lewis, Cara C.

AU - Boyd, Meredith

AU - Puspitasari, Ajeng

AU - Navarro, Elena

AU - Howard, Jacqueline

AU - Kassab, Hannah

AU - Hoffman, Mira

AU - Scott, Kelli

AU - Lyon, Aaron

AU - Douglas, Susan

AU - Simon, Greg

AU - Kroenke, Kurt

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Importance: Measurement-based care (MBC) is the systematic evaluation of patient symptoms before or during an encounter to inform behavioral health treatment. Despite MBC's demonstrated ability to enhance usual care by expediting improvements and rapidly detecting patients whose health would otherwise deteriorate, it is underused, with typically less than 20% of behavioral health practitioners integrating it into their practice. This narrative review addresses definitional issues, offers a concrete and evaluable operationalization of MBC fidelity, and summarizes the evidence base and utility of MBC. It also synthesizes the extant literature's characterization of barriers to and strategies for supporting MBC implementation, sustainment, and scale-up. Observations: Barriers to implementing MBC occur at multiple levels: patient (eg, concerns about confidentiality breach), practitioner (eg, beliefs that measures are no better than clinical judgment), organization (eg, no resources for training), and system (eg, competing requirements). Implementation science - the study of methods to integrate evidence-based practices such as MBC into routine care - offers strategies to address barriers. These strategies include using measurement feedback systems, leveraging local champions, forming learning collaboratives, training leadership, improving expert consultation with clinical staff, and generating incentives. Conclusions and Relevance: This narrative review, informed by implementation science, offers a 10-point research agenda to improve the integration of MBC into clinical practice: (1) harmonize terminology and specify MBC's core components; (2) develop criterion standard methods for monitoring fidelity and reporting quality of implementation; (3) develop algorithms for MBC to guide psychotherapy; (4) test putative mechanisms of change, particularly for psychotherapy; (5) develop brief and psychometrically strong measures for use in combination; (6) assess the critical timing of administration needed to optimize patient outcomes; (7) streamline measurement feedback systems to include only key ingredients and enhance electronic health record interoperability; (8) identify discrete strategies to support implementation; (9) make evidence-based policy decisions; and (10) align reimbursement structures.

AB - Importance: Measurement-based care (MBC) is the systematic evaluation of patient symptoms before or during an encounter to inform behavioral health treatment. Despite MBC's demonstrated ability to enhance usual care by expediting improvements and rapidly detecting patients whose health would otherwise deteriorate, it is underused, with typically less than 20% of behavioral health practitioners integrating it into their practice. This narrative review addresses definitional issues, offers a concrete and evaluable operationalization of MBC fidelity, and summarizes the evidence base and utility of MBC. It also synthesizes the extant literature's characterization of barriers to and strategies for supporting MBC implementation, sustainment, and scale-up. Observations: Barriers to implementing MBC occur at multiple levels: patient (eg, concerns about confidentiality breach), practitioner (eg, beliefs that measures are no better than clinical judgment), organization (eg, no resources for training), and system (eg, competing requirements). Implementation science - the study of methods to integrate evidence-based practices such as MBC into routine care - offers strategies to address barriers. These strategies include using measurement feedback systems, leveraging local champions, forming learning collaboratives, training leadership, improving expert consultation with clinical staff, and generating incentives. Conclusions and Relevance: This narrative review, informed by implementation science, offers a 10-point research agenda to improve the integration of MBC into clinical practice: (1) harmonize terminology and specify MBC's core components; (2) develop criterion standard methods for monitoring fidelity and reporting quality of implementation; (3) develop algorithms for MBC to guide psychotherapy; (4) test putative mechanisms of change, particularly for psychotherapy; (5) develop brief and psychometrically strong measures for use in combination; (6) assess the critical timing of administration needed to optimize patient outcomes; (7) streamline measurement feedback systems to include only key ingredients and enhance electronic health record interoperability; (8) identify discrete strategies to support implementation; (9) make evidence-based policy decisions; and (10) align reimbursement structures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059154719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059154719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3329

DO - 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3329

M3 - Article

C2 - 30566197

AN - SCOPUS:85059154719

JO - JAMA Psychiatry

JF - JAMA Psychiatry

SN - 2168-622X

ER -