Implementing person-centered communication in diabetes care: A new tool for diabetes care professionals

Ulla Connor, Lucina Kessler, Mary De Groot, Robert Mac Neill, Robert Sandy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This study tested the clinical implementation of the CoMac Communication System, an empirically validated tool for individualized Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES). This system provides immediate feedback and guidance to health care providers (HCPs) to facilitate speaking with persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus in language reflecting patients’ own worldviews and health beliefs. Patients and methods: This 6-month implementation science study at an accredited diabetes care clinic in a Midwestern US hospital was conducted in two phases. Phase I consisted of CoMac implementation, qualitative interviews with HCPs, and evaluation of clinic flow among the diabetes education team. Seventy-two participants received CoMac’s linguistically tailored patient-centric communication; a control group of 48 did not receive this intervention. In Phase II, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels from the first visit to the follow-up visit for each group were compared. Results: Interviews conducted during Phase I suggested that the system can be successfully implemented into DSMES practice. Knowing individual psychosocial profiles and participants’ language use allowed for more effective patient counseling. In Phase II, multiple regression analysis with HbA1c change as the dependent variable showed that the key variable of interest, treated with the CoMac intervention, had a one-tailed t-value of -1.81, with a statistically significant probability value of 0.037. Conclusion: Findings suggest that use of the CoMac System by diabetes care professionals has the potential for improved patient health outcomes. Patients receiving the CoMac intervention showed significantly improved HbA1c levels, suggesting that this approach has great promise for effective DSMES management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1443-1450
Number of pages8
JournalPatient Preference and Adherence
Volume13
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

chronic illness
Communication
human being
communication
Self Care
Education
Health Personnel
management
Hemoglobins
Language
education
Interviews
health care
Health
Glycosylated Hemoglobin A
science studies
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
worldview
language
Counseling

Keywords

  • Clinical implementation
  • Diabetes self-management
  • Linguistics
  • Patient language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Implementing person-centered communication in diabetes care : A new tool for diabetes care professionals. / Connor, Ulla; Kessler, Lucina; De Groot, Mary; Neill, Robert Mac; Sandy, Robert.

In: Patient Preference and Adherence, Vol. 13, 01.01.2019, p. 1443-1450.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Connor, Ulla ; Kessler, Lucina ; De Groot, Mary ; Neill, Robert Mac ; Sandy, Robert. / Implementing person-centered communication in diabetes care : A new tool for diabetes care professionals. In: Patient Preference and Adherence. 2019 ; Vol. 13. pp. 1443-1450.
@article{b75bb2a4dcf04a48908db81a42017840,
title = "Implementing person-centered communication in diabetes care: A new tool for diabetes care professionals",
abstract = "Purpose: This study tested the clinical implementation of the CoMac Communication System, an empirically validated tool for individualized Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES). This system provides immediate feedback and guidance to health care providers (HCPs) to facilitate speaking with persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus in language reflecting patients’ own worldviews and health beliefs. Patients and methods: This 6-month implementation science study at an accredited diabetes care clinic in a Midwestern US hospital was conducted in two phases. Phase I consisted of CoMac implementation, qualitative interviews with HCPs, and evaluation of clinic flow among the diabetes education team. Seventy-two participants received CoMac’s linguistically tailored patient-centric communication; a control group of 48 did not receive this intervention. In Phase II, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels from the first visit to the follow-up visit for each group were compared. Results: Interviews conducted during Phase I suggested that the system can be successfully implemented into DSMES practice. Knowing individual psychosocial profiles and participants’ language use allowed for more effective patient counseling. In Phase II, multiple regression analysis with HbA1c change as the dependent variable showed that the key variable of interest, treated with the CoMac intervention, had a one-tailed t-value of -1.81, with a statistically significant probability value of 0.037. Conclusion: Findings suggest that use of the CoMac System by diabetes care professionals has the potential for improved patient health outcomes. Patients receiving the CoMac intervention showed significantly improved HbA1c levels, suggesting that this approach has great promise for effective DSMES management.",
keywords = "Clinical implementation, Diabetes self-management, Linguistics, Patient language",
author = "Ulla Connor and Lucina Kessler and {De Groot}, Mary and Neill, {Robert Mac} and Robert Sandy",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2147/PPA.S214092",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "1443--1450",
journal = "Patient Preference and Adherence",
issn = "1177-889X",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementing person-centered communication in diabetes care

T2 - A new tool for diabetes care professionals

AU - Connor, Ulla

AU - Kessler, Lucina

AU - De Groot, Mary

AU - Neill, Robert Mac

AU - Sandy, Robert

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Purpose: This study tested the clinical implementation of the CoMac Communication System, an empirically validated tool for individualized Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES). This system provides immediate feedback and guidance to health care providers (HCPs) to facilitate speaking with persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus in language reflecting patients’ own worldviews and health beliefs. Patients and methods: This 6-month implementation science study at an accredited diabetes care clinic in a Midwestern US hospital was conducted in two phases. Phase I consisted of CoMac implementation, qualitative interviews with HCPs, and evaluation of clinic flow among the diabetes education team. Seventy-two participants received CoMac’s linguistically tailored patient-centric communication; a control group of 48 did not receive this intervention. In Phase II, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels from the first visit to the follow-up visit for each group were compared. Results: Interviews conducted during Phase I suggested that the system can be successfully implemented into DSMES practice. Knowing individual psychosocial profiles and participants’ language use allowed for more effective patient counseling. In Phase II, multiple regression analysis with HbA1c change as the dependent variable showed that the key variable of interest, treated with the CoMac intervention, had a one-tailed t-value of -1.81, with a statistically significant probability value of 0.037. Conclusion: Findings suggest that use of the CoMac System by diabetes care professionals has the potential for improved patient health outcomes. Patients receiving the CoMac intervention showed significantly improved HbA1c levels, suggesting that this approach has great promise for effective DSMES management.

AB - Purpose: This study tested the clinical implementation of the CoMac Communication System, an empirically validated tool for individualized Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES). This system provides immediate feedback and guidance to health care providers (HCPs) to facilitate speaking with persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus in language reflecting patients’ own worldviews and health beliefs. Patients and methods: This 6-month implementation science study at an accredited diabetes care clinic in a Midwestern US hospital was conducted in two phases. Phase I consisted of CoMac implementation, qualitative interviews with HCPs, and evaluation of clinic flow among the diabetes education team. Seventy-two participants received CoMac’s linguistically tailored patient-centric communication; a control group of 48 did not receive this intervention. In Phase II, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels from the first visit to the follow-up visit for each group were compared. Results: Interviews conducted during Phase I suggested that the system can be successfully implemented into DSMES practice. Knowing individual psychosocial profiles and participants’ language use allowed for more effective patient counseling. In Phase II, multiple regression analysis with HbA1c change as the dependent variable showed that the key variable of interest, treated with the CoMac intervention, had a one-tailed t-value of -1.81, with a statistically significant probability value of 0.037. Conclusion: Findings suggest that use of the CoMac System by diabetes care professionals has the potential for improved patient health outcomes. Patients receiving the CoMac intervention showed significantly improved HbA1c levels, suggesting that this approach has great promise for effective DSMES management.

KW - Clinical implementation

KW - Diabetes self-management

KW - Linguistics

KW - Patient language

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073391874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073391874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2147/PPA.S214092

DO - 10.2147/PPA.S214092

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073391874

VL - 13

SP - 1443

EP - 1450

JO - Patient Preference and Adherence

JF - Patient Preference and Adherence

SN - 1177-889X

ER -