Impotence and incontinence after immediate realignment of posterior urethral trauma: Result of injury or management?

Leonid Kotkin, Michael Koch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We examined further whether the injury or method of management is responsible for impotence and incontinence after immediate realignment of prostate-membranous urethral disruptions. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 patients with complete urethral disruptions treated with immediate realignment (group 1) was compared to 12 with partial or complete injuries treated with retrograde catheterization alone (group 2). Followup status was obtained by patient questionnaire or telephone interview. Results: Of the patients 83% in group 1 and 80% in group 2 are continent, and 76% and 70%, respectively, regained erections suitable for sexual intercourse. Conclusions: The results suggest that impotence and incontinence in this setting are the result of the injury and not of attempts at immediate surgical management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1600-1603
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume155
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Erectile Dysfunction
Wounds and Injuries
Coitus
Catheterization
Prostate
Interviews

Keywords

  • impotence
  • penis
  • urethra
  • urinary incontinence
  • wounds and injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Impotence and incontinence after immediate realignment of posterior urethral trauma : Result of injury or management? / Kotkin, Leonid; Koch, Michael.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 155, No. 5, 05.1996, p. 1600-1603.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4ab35c557fa542bf882bd3a076e9b693,
title = "Impotence and incontinence after immediate realignment of posterior urethral trauma: Result of injury or management?",
abstract = "Purpose: We examined further whether the injury or method of management is responsible for impotence and incontinence after immediate realignment of prostate-membranous urethral disruptions. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 patients with complete urethral disruptions treated with immediate realignment (group 1) was compared to 12 with partial or complete injuries treated with retrograde catheterization alone (group 2). Followup status was obtained by patient questionnaire or telephone interview. Results: Of the patients 83{\%} in group 1 and 80{\%} in group 2 are continent, and 76{\%} and 70{\%}, respectively, regained erections suitable for sexual intercourse. Conclusions: The results suggest that impotence and incontinence in this setting are the result of the injury and not of attempts at immediate surgical management.",
keywords = "impotence, penis, urethra, urinary incontinence, wounds and injuries",
author = "Leonid Kotkin and Michael Koch",
year = "1996",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66140-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "155",
pages = "1600--1603",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impotence and incontinence after immediate realignment of posterior urethral trauma

T2 - Result of injury or management?

AU - Kotkin, Leonid

AU - Koch, Michael

PY - 1996/5

Y1 - 1996/5

N2 - Purpose: We examined further whether the injury or method of management is responsible for impotence and incontinence after immediate realignment of prostate-membranous urethral disruptions. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 patients with complete urethral disruptions treated with immediate realignment (group 1) was compared to 12 with partial or complete injuries treated with retrograde catheterization alone (group 2). Followup status was obtained by patient questionnaire or telephone interview. Results: Of the patients 83% in group 1 and 80% in group 2 are continent, and 76% and 70%, respectively, regained erections suitable for sexual intercourse. Conclusions: The results suggest that impotence and incontinence in this setting are the result of the injury and not of attempts at immediate surgical management.

AB - Purpose: We examined further whether the injury or method of management is responsible for impotence and incontinence after immediate realignment of prostate-membranous urethral disruptions. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 patients with complete urethral disruptions treated with immediate realignment (group 1) was compared to 12 with partial or complete injuries treated with retrograde catheterization alone (group 2). Followup status was obtained by patient questionnaire or telephone interview. Results: Of the patients 83% in group 1 and 80% in group 2 are continent, and 76% and 70%, respectively, regained erections suitable for sexual intercourse. Conclusions: The results suggest that impotence and incontinence in this setting are the result of the injury and not of attempts at immediate surgical management.

KW - impotence

KW - penis

KW - urethra

KW - urinary incontinence

KW - wounds and injuries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029986299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029986299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66140-8

DO - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66140-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 8627832

AN - SCOPUS:0029986299

VL - 155

SP - 1600

EP - 1603

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 5

ER -