Improving communication near the end of life

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research suggests that communication near the end of life is problematic. A literature review was conducted to identify barriers to optimal communication near the end of life and strategies to overcome them. Barriers include clinician beliefs, patient characteristics, American popular and medical cultures, and the health care system. Clinician and patient barriers can be addressed through education, advance planning, the inclusion of patients' family members, and individualizing care. Cultural and systems problems can be addressed through public as well as professional education, alternative models of care, and coalition building. Combined, these approaches can help improve communication near the end of life and ultimately improve care for the dying.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)252-267+192
JournalAmerican Behavioral Scientist
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2002

Fingerprint

Communication
communication
Professional Education
dying
family member
coalition
education
inclusion
health care
Delivery of Health Care
Education
planning
Research
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Cultural Studies
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Improving communication near the end of life. / Hickman, Susan E.

In: American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 46, No. 2, 01.10.2002, p. 252-267+192.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{181d270c3ac74db2962059dcaa4c32e5,
title = "Improving communication near the end of life",
abstract = "Research suggests that communication near the end of life is problematic. A literature review was conducted to identify barriers to optimal communication near the end of life and strategies to overcome them. Barriers include clinician beliefs, patient characteristics, American popular and medical cultures, and the health care system. Clinician and patient barriers can be addressed through education, advance planning, the inclusion of patients' family members, and individualizing care. Cultural and systems problems can be addressed through public as well as professional education, alternative models of care, and coalition building. Combined, these approaches can help improve communication near the end of life and ultimately improve care for the dying.",
author = "Hickman, {Susan E.}",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/000276402236677",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "252--267+192",
journal = "American Behavioral Scientist",
issn = "0002-7642",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving communication near the end of life

AU - Hickman, Susan E.

PY - 2002/10/1

Y1 - 2002/10/1

N2 - Research suggests that communication near the end of life is problematic. A literature review was conducted to identify barriers to optimal communication near the end of life and strategies to overcome them. Barriers include clinician beliefs, patient characteristics, American popular and medical cultures, and the health care system. Clinician and patient barriers can be addressed through education, advance planning, the inclusion of patients' family members, and individualizing care. Cultural and systems problems can be addressed through public as well as professional education, alternative models of care, and coalition building. Combined, these approaches can help improve communication near the end of life and ultimately improve care for the dying.

AB - Research suggests that communication near the end of life is problematic. A literature review was conducted to identify barriers to optimal communication near the end of life and strategies to overcome them. Barriers include clinician beliefs, patient characteristics, American popular and medical cultures, and the health care system. Clinician and patient barriers can be addressed through education, advance planning, the inclusion of patients' family members, and individualizing care. Cultural and systems problems can be addressed through public as well as professional education, alternative models of care, and coalition building. Combined, these approaches can help improve communication near the end of life and ultimately improve care for the dying.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038132112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038132112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/000276402236677

DO - 10.1177/000276402236677

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:0038132112

VL - 46

SP - 252-267+192

JO - American Behavioral Scientist

JF - American Behavioral Scientist

SN - 0002-7642

IS - 2

ER -