Improving diversity, inclusion, and representation in radiology and radiation oncology part 1: Why these matter

Johnson B. Lightfoote, Julia R. Fielding, Curtiland Deville, Richard Gunderman, Gail N. Morgan, Pari V. Pandharipande, Andre J. Duerinckx, Raymond B. Wynn, Katarzyna J. Macura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ACR Commission for Women and General Diversity is committed to identifying barriers to a diverse physician workforce in radiology and radiation oncology (RRO), and to offering policy recommendations to overcome these barriers. In Part 1 of a 2-part position article from the commission, diversity as a concept and its dimensions of personality, character, ethnicity, biology, biography, and organization are introduced. Terms commonly used to describe diverse individuals and groups are reviewed. The history of diversity and inclusion in US society and health care are addressed. The post-Civil Rights Era evolution of diversity in medicine is delineated: Diversity 1.0, with basic awareness, nondiscrimination, and recruitment; Diversity 2.0, with appreciation of the value of diversity but inclusion as peripheral or in opposition to other goals; and Diversity 3.0, which integrates diversity and inclusion into core missions of organizations and their leadership, and leverages its potential for innovation and contribution. The current states of diversity and inclusion in RRO are reviewed in regard to gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender identity. The lack of representation and unchanged demographics in these fields relative to other medical specialties are explored. The business case for diversity is discussed, with examples of successful models and potential application to the health care industry in general and to RRO. The moral, ethical, and public health imperative for diversity is also highlighted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)673-680
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume11
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Radiation Oncology
Radiology
Medicine
Organizations
Civil Rights
Health Care Sector
Sexual Behavior
Personality
Public Health
History
Demography
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians

Keywords

  • Diversity
  • health disparities
  • health policy
  • radiation oncology
  • radiology
  • underrepresented minorities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Improving diversity, inclusion, and representation in radiology and radiation oncology part 1 : Why these matter. / Lightfoote, Johnson B.; Fielding, Julia R.; Deville, Curtiland; Gunderman, Richard; Morgan, Gail N.; Pandharipande, Pari V.; Duerinckx, Andre J.; Wynn, Raymond B.; Macura, Katarzyna J.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 11, No. 7, 2014, p. 673-680.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lightfoote, JB, Fielding, JR, Deville, C, Gunderman, R, Morgan, GN, Pandharipande, PV, Duerinckx, AJ, Wynn, RB & Macura, KJ 2014, 'Improving diversity, inclusion, and representation in radiology and radiation oncology part 1: Why these matter', Journal of the American College of Radiology, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 673-680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2014.03.007
Lightfoote, Johnson B. ; Fielding, Julia R. ; Deville, Curtiland ; Gunderman, Richard ; Morgan, Gail N. ; Pandharipande, Pari V. ; Duerinckx, Andre J. ; Wynn, Raymond B. ; Macura, Katarzyna J. / Improving diversity, inclusion, and representation in radiology and radiation oncology part 1 : Why these matter. In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2014 ; Vol. 11, No. 7. pp. 673-680.
@article{32defcb3311f46df8e6129d244735358,
title = "Improving diversity, inclusion, and representation in radiology and radiation oncology part 1: Why these matter",
abstract = "The ACR Commission for Women and General Diversity is committed to identifying barriers to a diverse physician workforce in radiology and radiation oncology (RRO), and to offering policy recommendations to overcome these barriers. In Part 1 of a 2-part position article from the commission, diversity as a concept and its dimensions of personality, character, ethnicity, biology, biography, and organization are introduced. Terms commonly used to describe diverse individuals and groups are reviewed. The history of diversity and inclusion in US society and health care are addressed. The post-Civil Rights Era evolution of diversity in medicine is delineated: Diversity 1.0, with basic awareness, nondiscrimination, and recruitment; Diversity 2.0, with appreciation of the value of diversity but inclusion as peripheral or in opposition to other goals; and Diversity 3.0, which integrates diversity and inclusion into core missions of organizations and their leadership, and leverages its potential for innovation and contribution. The current states of diversity and inclusion in RRO are reviewed in regard to gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender identity. The lack of representation and unchanged demographics in these fields relative to other medical specialties are explored. The business case for diversity is discussed, with examples of successful models and potential application to the health care industry in general and to RRO. The moral, ethical, and public health imperative for diversity is also highlighted.",
keywords = "Diversity, health disparities, health policy, radiation oncology, radiology, underrepresented minorities",
author = "Lightfoote, {Johnson B.} and Fielding, {Julia R.} and Curtiland Deville and Richard Gunderman and Morgan, {Gail N.} and Pandharipande, {Pari V.} and Duerinckx, {Andre J.} and Wynn, {Raymond B.} and Macura, {Katarzyna J.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2014.03.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "673--680",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving diversity, inclusion, and representation in radiology and radiation oncology part 1

T2 - Why these matter

AU - Lightfoote, Johnson B.

AU - Fielding, Julia R.

AU - Deville, Curtiland

AU - Gunderman, Richard

AU - Morgan, Gail N.

AU - Pandharipande, Pari V.

AU - Duerinckx, Andre J.

AU - Wynn, Raymond B.

AU - Macura, Katarzyna J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The ACR Commission for Women and General Diversity is committed to identifying barriers to a diverse physician workforce in radiology and radiation oncology (RRO), and to offering policy recommendations to overcome these barriers. In Part 1 of a 2-part position article from the commission, diversity as a concept and its dimensions of personality, character, ethnicity, biology, biography, and organization are introduced. Terms commonly used to describe diverse individuals and groups are reviewed. The history of diversity and inclusion in US society and health care are addressed. The post-Civil Rights Era evolution of diversity in medicine is delineated: Diversity 1.0, with basic awareness, nondiscrimination, and recruitment; Diversity 2.0, with appreciation of the value of diversity but inclusion as peripheral or in opposition to other goals; and Diversity 3.0, which integrates diversity and inclusion into core missions of organizations and their leadership, and leverages its potential for innovation and contribution. The current states of diversity and inclusion in RRO are reviewed in regard to gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender identity. The lack of representation and unchanged demographics in these fields relative to other medical specialties are explored. The business case for diversity is discussed, with examples of successful models and potential application to the health care industry in general and to RRO. The moral, ethical, and public health imperative for diversity is also highlighted.

AB - The ACR Commission for Women and General Diversity is committed to identifying barriers to a diverse physician workforce in radiology and radiation oncology (RRO), and to offering policy recommendations to overcome these barriers. In Part 1 of a 2-part position article from the commission, diversity as a concept and its dimensions of personality, character, ethnicity, biology, biography, and organization are introduced. Terms commonly used to describe diverse individuals and groups are reviewed. The history of diversity and inclusion in US society and health care are addressed. The post-Civil Rights Era evolution of diversity in medicine is delineated: Diversity 1.0, with basic awareness, nondiscrimination, and recruitment; Diversity 2.0, with appreciation of the value of diversity but inclusion as peripheral or in opposition to other goals; and Diversity 3.0, which integrates diversity and inclusion into core missions of organizations and their leadership, and leverages its potential for innovation and contribution. The current states of diversity and inclusion in RRO are reviewed in regard to gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender identity. The lack of representation and unchanged demographics in these fields relative to other medical specialties are explored. The business case for diversity is discussed, with examples of successful models and potential application to the health care industry in general and to RRO. The moral, ethical, and public health imperative for diversity is also highlighted.

KW - Diversity

KW - health disparities

KW - health policy

KW - radiation oncology

KW - radiology

KW - underrepresented minorities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928096230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928096230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.03.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 24993534

AN - SCOPUS:84928096230

VL - 11

SP - 673

EP - 680

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 7

ER -