Improving quality improvement collaboratives

Mixing communication media to attain multiple measures of success

Priscilla A. Arling, Edward Miech, Gregory Arling

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

For several decades, researchers have studied the comparative effect of face-to-face and electronic communication.Some have claimed that electronic communication is detrimental to outcomes while othershave emphasized its advantages. For members of healthcare quality improvement (QI) collaboratives,a mix of both of types of communication is often used, due to geographical dispersion. This chapterexamines the outcomes of a specific QI collaborative, the Empira Falls Prevention project in Minnesota,USA. Levels of electronic communication between collaborative members were found to be associatedwith a positive patient outcome, specifically a reduction in falls. Electronic and face-to-face communicationdiffered in their association with success measures for the collaborative. The findings suggestthat the two modes of communication can be leverage to attain maximum benefits from participating ina quality improvement collaborative.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationDesign, Development, and Integration of Reliable Electronic Healthcare Platforms
PublisherIGI Global
Pages243-254
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)9781522517252
ISBN (Print)1522517243, 9781522517245
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 19 2016

Fingerprint

Communications Media
Quality Improvement
Communication
Research Personnel
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Arling, P. A., Miech, E., & Arling, G. (2016). Improving quality improvement collaboratives: Mixing communication media to attain multiple measures of success. In Design, Development, and Integration of Reliable Electronic Healthcare Platforms (pp. 243-254). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1724-5.ch014

Improving quality improvement collaboratives : Mixing communication media to attain multiple measures of success. / Arling, Priscilla A.; Miech, Edward; Arling, Gregory.

Design, Development, and Integration of Reliable Electronic Healthcare Platforms. IGI Global, 2016. p. 243-254.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Arling, PA, Miech, E & Arling, G 2016, Improving quality improvement collaboratives: Mixing communication media to attain multiple measures of success. in Design, Development, and Integration of Reliable Electronic Healthcare Platforms. IGI Global, pp. 243-254. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1724-5.ch014
Arling PA, Miech E, Arling G. Improving quality improvement collaboratives: Mixing communication media to attain multiple measures of success. In Design, Development, and Integration of Reliable Electronic Healthcare Platforms. IGI Global. 2016. p. 243-254 https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1724-5.ch014
Arling, Priscilla A. ; Miech, Edward ; Arling, Gregory. / Improving quality improvement collaboratives : Mixing communication media to attain multiple measures of success. Design, Development, and Integration of Reliable Electronic Healthcare Platforms. IGI Global, 2016. pp. 243-254
@inbook{44c7b4f752904e118cb8cfb19492d5fe,
title = "Improving quality improvement collaboratives: Mixing communication media to attain multiple measures of success",
abstract = "For several decades, researchers have studied the comparative effect of face-to-face and electronic communication.Some have claimed that electronic communication is detrimental to outcomes while othershave emphasized its advantages. For members of healthcare quality improvement (QI) collaboratives,a mix of both of types of communication is often used, due to geographical dispersion. This chapterexamines the outcomes of a specific QI collaborative, the Empira Falls Prevention project in Minnesota,USA. Levels of electronic communication between collaborative members were found to be associatedwith a positive patient outcome, specifically a reduction in falls. Electronic and face-to-face communicationdiffered in their association with success measures for the collaborative. The findings suggestthat the two modes of communication can be leverage to attain maximum benefits from participating ina quality improvement collaborative.",
author = "Arling, {Priscilla A.} and Edward Miech and Gregory Arling",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "19",
doi = "10.4018/978-1-5225-1724-5.ch014",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "1522517243",
pages = "243--254",
booktitle = "Design, Development, and Integration of Reliable Electronic Healthcare Platforms",
publisher = "IGI Global",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Improving quality improvement collaboratives

T2 - Mixing communication media to attain multiple measures of success

AU - Arling, Priscilla A.

AU - Miech, Edward

AU - Arling, Gregory

PY - 2016/10/19

Y1 - 2016/10/19

N2 - For several decades, researchers have studied the comparative effect of face-to-face and electronic communication.Some have claimed that electronic communication is detrimental to outcomes while othershave emphasized its advantages. For members of healthcare quality improvement (QI) collaboratives,a mix of both of types of communication is often used, due to geographical dispersion. This chapterexamines the outcomes of a specific QI collaborative, the Empira Falls Prevention project in Minnesota,USA. Levels of electronic communication between collaborative members were found to be associatedwith a positive patient outcome, specifically a reduction in falls. Electronic and face-to-face communicationdiffered in their association with success measures for the collaborative. The findings suggestthat the two modes of communication can be leverage to attain maximum benefits from participating ina quality improvement collaborative.

AB - For several decades, researchers have studied the comparative effect of face-to-face and electronic communication.Some have claimed that electronic communication is detrimental to outcomes while othershave emphasized its advantages. For members of healthcare quality improvement (QI) collaboratives,a mix of both of types of communication is often used, due to geographical dispersion. This chapterexamines the outcomes of a specific QI collaborative, the Empira Falls Prevention project in Minnesota,USA. Levels of electronic communication between collaborative members were found to be associatedwith a positive patient outcome, specifically a reduction in falls. Electronic and face-to-face communicationdiffered in their association with success measures for the collaborative. The findings suggestthat the two modes of communication can be leverage to attain maximum benefits from participating ina quality improvement collaborative.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016078981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016078981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4018/978-1-5225-1724-5.ch014

DO - 10.4018/978-1-5225-1724-5.ch014

M3 - Chapter

SN - 1522517243

SN - 9781522517245

SP - 243

EP - 254

BT - Design, Development, and Integration of Reliable Electronic Healthcare Platforms

PB - IGI Global

ER -