In Search of Recovered Memories

Amy C. Tsai, Sarah Honaker, Elizabeth F. Loftus

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter surveys the legal status of repression and the present trends toward third-party liability for clinicians diagnosing or misdiagnosing repressed memory. The scientific evidence for the phenomenon is reviewed and suggestions for practice and research are proposed. The question of whether repressed memories exist is not just one of scientific interest. Real lives are affected when people claim to recover such memories of childhood abuse. At trial, a jury may have to decide whether abuse, and repression of that abuse, occurred or not. Before the case is brought to trial, however, the court must first determine whether the repressed memory claim can be heard at all. If there is no core set of symptoms that can accurately predict when someone has been abused, then clinicians face a formidable task if they wish to ascertain whether a patient might have a repressed memory of abuse. This is a different problem from determining how best to treat someone who has known from the beginning that he or she was abused, where the malleability of memory may be a nonissue.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHandbook of Forensic Psychology: Resource for Mental Health and Legal Professionals
PublisherElsevier Inc.
Pages555-577
Number of pages23
ISBN (Print)9780080495101, 9780125241960
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 12 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Repression (Psychology)
Jurisprudence
Diagnostic Errors
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Tsai, A. C., Honaker, S., & Loftus, E. F. (2003). In Search of Recovered Memories. In Handbook of Forensic Psychology: Resource for Mental Health and Legal Professionals (pp. 555-577). Elsevier Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012524196-0/50024-3

In Search of Recovered Memories. / Tsai, Amy C.; Honaker, Sarah; Loftus, Elizabeth F.

Handbook of Forensic Psychology: Resource for Mental Health and Legal Professionals. Elsevier Inc., 2003. p. 555-577.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Tsai, AC, Honaker, S & Loftus, EF 2003, In Search of Recovered Memories. in Handbook of Forensic Psychology: Resource for Mental Health and Legal Professionals. Elsevier Inc., pp. 555-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012524196-0/50024-3
Tsai AC, Honaker S, Loftus EF. In Search of Recovered Memories. In Handbook of Forensic Psychology: Resource for Mental Health and Legal Professionals. Elsevier Inc. 2003. p. 555-577 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012524196-0/50024-3
Tsai, Amy C. ; Honaker, Sarah ; Loftus, Elizabeth F. / In Search of Recovered Memories. Handbook of Forensic Psychology: Resource for Mental Health and Legal Professionals. Elsevier Inc., 2003. pp. 555-577
@inbook{3becf98d139445cbb835d019219be9e1,
title = "In Search of Recovered Memories",
abstract = "This chapter surveys the legal status of repression and the present trends toward third-party liability for clinicians diagnosing or misdiagnosing repressed memory. The scientific evidence for the phenomenon is reviewed and suggestions for practice and research are proposed. The question of whether repressed memories exist is not just one of scientific interest. Real lives are affected when people claim to recover such memories of childhood abuse. At trial, a jury may have to decide whether abuse, and repression of that abuse, occurred or not. Before the case is brought to trial, however, the court must first determine whether the repressed memory claim can be heard at all. If there is no core set of symptoms that can accurately predict when someone has been abused, then clinicians face a formidable task if they wish to ascertain whether a patient might have a repressed memory of abuse. This is a different problem from determining how best to treat someone who has known from the beginning that he or she was abused, where the malleability of memory may be a nonissue.",
author = "Tsai, {Amy C.} and Sarah Honaker and Loftus, {Elizabeth F.}",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1016/B978-012524196-0/50024-3",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780080495101",
pages = "555--577",
booktitle = "Handbook of Forensic Psychology: Resource for Mental Health and Legal Professionals",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - In Search of Recovered Memories

AU - Tsai, Amy C.

AU - Honaker, Sarah

AU - Loftus, Elizabeth F.

PY - 2003/12/12

Y1 - 2003/12/12

N2 - This chapter surveys the legal status of repression and the present trends toward third-party liability for clinicians diagnosing or misdiagnosing repressed memory. The scientific evidence for the phenomenon is reviewed and suggestions for practice and research are proposed. The question of whether repressed memories exist is not just one of scientific interest. Real lives are affected when people claim to recover such memories of childhood abuse. At trial, a jury may have to decide whether abuse, and repression of that abuse, occurred or not. Before the case is brought to trial, however, the court must first determine whether the repressed memory claim can be heard at all. If there is no core set of symptoms that can accurately predict when someone has been abused, then clinicians face a formidable task if they wish to ascertain whether a patient might have a repressed memory of abuse. This is a different problem from determining how best to treat someone who has known from the beginning that he or she was abused, where the malleability of memory may be a nonissue.

AB - This chapter surveys the legal status of repression and the present trends toward third-party liability for clinicians diagnosing or misdiagnosing repressed memory. The scientific evidence for the phenomenon is reviewed and suggestions for practice and research are proposed. The question of whether repressed memories exist is not just one of scientific interest. Real lives are affected when people claim to recover such memories of childhood abuse. At trial, a jury may have to decide whether abuse, and repression of that abuse, occurred or not. Before the case is brought to trial, however, the court must first determine whether the repressed memory claim can be heard at all. If there is no core set of symptoms that can accurately predict when someone has been abused, then clinicians face a formidable task if they wish to ascertain whether a patient might have a repressed memory of abuse. This is a different problem from determining how best to treat someone who has known from the beginning that he or she was abused, where the malleability of memory may be a nonissue.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889464803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889464803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-012524196-0/50024-3

DO - 10.1016/B978-012524196-0/50024-3

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780080495101

SN - 9780125241960

SP - 555

EP - 577

BT - Handbook of Forensic Psychology: Resource for Mental Health and Legal Professionals

PB - Elsevier Inc.

ER -