In their own words

Qualitative study of high-utilising primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms

Francesca C. Dwamena, Judith S. Lyles, Richard Frankel, Robert C. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: High utilising primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) often frustrate their primary care providers. Studies that elucidate the attitudes of these patients may help to increase understanding and improve confidence of clinicians who care for them. The objective of this study was to describe and analyze perceptions and lived experiences of high utilising primary care patients with MUS. Methods: A purposive sample of 19 high utilising primary care patients for whom at least 50% (69.6% in this sample) of visits for two years could not be explained medically, were encouraged to talk spontaneously about themselves and answer semi-structured questions. Verbatim transcripts of interviews were analyzed using an iterative consensus building process. Results: Patients with MUS almost universally described current and/or past family dysfunction and were subjected to excessive testing and ineffective empirical treatments. Three distinct groups emerged from the data. 1) Some patients, who had achieved a significant degree of psychological insight and had success in life, primarily sought explanations for their symptoms. 2) Patients who had less psychological insight were more disabled by their symptoms and felt strongly entitled to be excused from normal social obligations. Typically, these patients primarily sought symptom relief, legitimization, and support. 3) Patients who expressed worry about missed diagnoses demanded excessive care and complained when their demands were resisted. Conclusion: High utilising primary care patients are a heterogeneous group with similar experiences and different perceptions, behaviours and needs. Recognizing these differences may be critical to effective treatment and reduction in utilisation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number67
JournalBMC Family Practice
Volume10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Medically Unexplained Symptoms
Psychology
Social Responsibility
Consensus
Interviews
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

In their own words : Qualitative study of high-utilising primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms. / Dwamena, Francesca C.; Lyles, Judith S.; Frankel, Richard; Smith, Robert C.

In: BMC Family Practice, Vol. 10, 67, 2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c489d6c48b1d4f3199c768eee29cf479,
title = "In their own words: Qualitative study of high-utilising primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms",
abstract = "Background: High utilising primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) often frustrate their primary care providers. Studies that elucidate the attitudes of these patients may help to increase understanding and improve confidence of clinicians who care for them. The objective of this study was to describe and analyze perceptions and lived experiences of high utilising primary care patients with MUS. Methods: A purposive sample of 19 high utilising primary care patients for whom at least 50{\%} (69.6{\%} in this sample) of visits for two years could not be explained medically, were encouraged to talk spontaneously about themselves and answer semi-structured questions. Verbatim transcripts of interviews were analyzed using an iterative consensus building process. Results: Patients with MUS almost universally described current and/or past family dysfunction and were subjected to excessive testing and ineffective empirical treatments. Three distinct groups emerged from the data. 1) Some patients, who had achieved a significant degree of psychological insight and had success in life, primarily sought explanations for their symptoms. 2) Patients who had less psychological insight were more disabled by their symptoms and felt strongly entitled to be excused from normal social obligations. Typically, these patients primarily sought symptom relief, legitimization, and support. 3) Patients who expressed worry about missed diagnoses demanded excessive care and complained when their demands were resisted. Conclusion: High utilising primary care patients are a heterogeneous group with similar experiences and different perceptions, behaviours and needs. Recognizing these differences may be critical to effective treatment and reduction in utilisation.",
author = "Dwamena, {Francesca C.} and Lyles, {Judith S.} and Richard Frankel and Smith, {Robert C.}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2296-10-67",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "BMC Family Practice",
issn = "1471-2296",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In their own words

T2 - Qualitative study of high-utilising primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms

AU - Dwamena, Francesca C.

AU - Lyles, Judith S.

AU - Frankel, Richard

AU - Smith, Robert C.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Background: High utilising primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) often frustrate their primary care providers. Studies that elucidate the attitudes of these patients may help to increase understanding and improve confidence of clinicians who care for them. The objective of this study was to describe and analyze perceptions and lived experiences of high utilising primary care patients with MUS. Methods: A purposive sample of 19 high utilising primary care patients for whom at least 50% (69.6% in this sample) of visits for two years could not be explained medically, were encouraged to talk spontaneously about themselves and answer semi-structured questions. Verbatim transcripts of interviews were analyzed using an iterative consensus building process. Results: Patients with MUS almost universally described current and/or past family dysfunction and were subjected to excessive testing and ineffective empirical treatments. Three distinct groups emerged from the data. 1) Some patients, who had achieved a significant degree of psychological insight and had success in life, primarily sought explanations for their symptoms. 2) Patients who had less psychological insight were more disabled by their symptoms and felt strongly entitled to be excused from normal social obligations. Typically, these patients primarily sought symptom relief, legitimization, and support. 3) Patients who expressed worry about missed diagnoses demanded excessive care and complained when their demands were resisted. Conclusion: High utilising primary care patients are a heterogeneous group with similar experiences and different perceptions, behaviours and needs. Recognizing these differences may be critical to effective treatment and reduction in utilisation.

AB - Background: High utilising primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) often frustrate their primary care providers. Studies that elucidate the attitudes of these patients may help to increase understanding and improve confidence of clinicians who care for them. The objective of this study was to describe and analyze perceptions and lived experiences of high utilising primary care patients with MUS. Methods: A purposive sample of 19 high utilising primary care patients for whom at least 50% (69.6% in this sample) of visits for two years could not be explained medically, were encouraged to talk spontaneously about themselves and answer semi-structured questions. Verbatim transcripts of interviews were analyzed using an iterative consensus building process. Results: Patients with MUS almost universally described current and/or past family dysfunction and were subjected to excessive testing and ineffective empirical treatments. Three distinct groups emerged from the data. 1) Some patients, who had achieved a significant degree of psychological insight and had success in life, primarily sought explanations for their symptoms. 2) Patients who had less psychological insight were more disabled by their symptoms and felt strongly entitled to be excused from normal social obligations. Typically, these patients primarily sought symptom relief, legitimization, and support. 3) Patients who expressed worry about missed diagnoses demanded excessive care and complained when their demands were resisted. Conclusion: High utilising primary care patients are a heterogeneous group with similar experiences and different perceptions, behaviours and needs. Recognizing these differences may be critical to effective treatment and reduction in utilisation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71049124919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71049124919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2296-10-67

DO - 10.1186/1471-2296-10-67

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - BMC Family Practice

JF - BMC Family Practice

SN - 1471-2296

M1 - 67

ER -