In Vitro Assessment of a Novel Dual Probe Ultrasonic Intracorporeal Lithotriptor

Samuel C. Kim, Brian R. Matlaga, William W. Tinmouth, Ramsay L. Kuo, Andrew Evan, James A. McAteer, James Williams, James E. Lingeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The Cyberwand (Cybersonics, Erie, Pennsylvania) is a novel intracorporeal lithotrite that uses coaxial ultrasonic elements operating at 2 frequencies. We compared this device to the LithoClast® Ultra, which we previously noted is the most efficient commercially available intracorporeal lithotripsy device. Materials and Methods: An in vitro test system was used to assess the efficiency of stone penetration for the Cyberwand and the LithoClast Ultra. The devices were mounted upright with the probe tip up in a modified irrigation sheath. A gypsum artificial stone was centered on the probe tip and a mass was placed atop the stone to provide a constant force. The manufacturer recommended setting was selected for the Cyberwand, while for the LithoClast Ultra a pneumatic frequency of 12 Hz with an ultrasonic power setting of 100% was selected, representing optimal settings in previous in vitro tests. The time required for complete stone penetration was measured. Differences in mean stone penetration times were compared using ANOVA. Results: Mean ± SD penetration time for the Cyberwand was significantly shorter than for the LithoClast Ultra (4.8 ± 0.6 vs 8.1 ± 0.6 seconds, p <0.0001). Neither device showed any difficulties with overheating, occlusion or another malfunction. Conclusions: Initial assessment using our hands-free in vitro test system, in which stone penetration time is not affected by operator bias, suggests that the Cyberwand is an efficient lithotrite. These promising results justify in vivo testing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1363-1365
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume177
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2007

Fingerprint

Ultrasonics
Equipment and Supplies
Calcium Sulfate
Lithotripsy
Analysis of Variance
Hand
In Vitro Techniques

Keywords

  • kidney
  • kidney calculi
  • lithotripsy
  • nephrostomy
  • percutaneous

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Kim, S. C., Matlaga, B. R., Tinmouth, W. W., Kuo, R. L., Evan, A., McAteer, J. A., ... Lingeman, J. E. (2007). In Vitro Assessment of a Novel Dual Probe Ultrasonic Intracorporeal Lithotriptor. Journal of Urology, 177(4), 1363-1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.033

In Vitro Assessment of a Novel Dual Probe Ultrasonic Intracorporeal Lithotriptor. / Kim, Samuel C.; Matlaga, Brian R.; Tinmouth, William W.; Kuo, Ramsay L.; Evan, Andrew; McAteer, James A.; Williams, James; Lingeman, James E.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 177, No. 4, 04.2007, p. 1363-1365.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, SC, Matlaga, BR, Tinmouth, WW, Kuo, RL, Evan, A, McAteer, JA, Williams, J & Lingeman, JE 2007, 'In Vitro Assessment of a Novel Dual Probe Ultrasonic Intracorporeal Lithotriptor', Journal of Urology, vol. 177, no. 4, pp. 1363-1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.033
Kim, Samuel C. ; Matlaga, Brian R. ; Tinmouth, William W. ; Kuo, Ramsay L. ; Evan, Andrew ; McAteer, James A. ; Williams, James ; Lingeman, James E. / In Vitro Assessment of a Novel Dual Probe Ultrasonic Intracorporeal Lithotriptor. In: Journal of Urology. 2007 ; Vol. 177, No. 4. pp. 1363-1365.
@article{6847815104704eae8cfaf08136be2282,
title = "In Vitro Assessment of a Novel Dual Probe Ultrasonic Intracorporeal Lithotriptor",
abstract = "Purpose: The Cyberwand (Cybersonics, Erie, Pennsylvania) is a novel intracorporeal lithotrite that uses coaxial ultrasonic elements operating at 2 frequencies. We compared this device to the LithoClast{\circledR} Ultra, which we previously noted is the most efficient commercially available intracorporeal lithotripsy device. Materials and Methods: An in vitro test system was used to assess the efficiency of stone penetration for the Cyberwand and the LithoClast Ultra. The devices were mounted upright with the probe tip up in a modified irrigation sheath. A gypsum artificial stone was centered on the probe tip and a mass was placed atop the stone to provide a constant force. The manufacturer recommended setting was selected for the Cyberwand, while for the LithoClast Ultra a pneumatic frequency of 12 Hz with an ultrasonic power setting of 100{\%} was selected, representing optimal settings in previous in vitro tests. The time required for complete stone penetration was measured. Differences in mean stone penetration times were compared using ANOVA. Results: Mean ± SD penetration time for the Cyberwand was significantly shorter than for the LithoClast Ultra (4.8 ± 0.6 vs 8.1 ± 0.6 seconds, p <0.0001). Neither device showed any difficulties with overheating, occlusion or another malfunction. Conclusions: Initial assessment using our hands-free in vitro test system, in which stone penetration time is not affected by operator bias, suggests that the Cyberwand is an efficient lithotrite. These promising results justify in vivo testing.",
keywords = "kidney, kidney calculi, lithotripsy, nephrostomy, percutaneous",
author = "Kim, {Samuel C.} and Matlaga, {Brian R.} and Tinmouth, {William W.} and Kuo, {Ramsay L.} and Andrew Evan and McAteer, {James A.} and James Williams and Lingeman, {James E.}",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.033",
language = "English",
volume = "177",
pages = "1363--1365",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In Vitro Assessment of a Novel Dual Probe Ultrasonic Intracorporeal Lithotriptor

AU - Kim, Samuel C.

AU - Matlaga, Brian R.

AU - Tinmouth, William W.

AU - Kuo, Ramsay L.

AU - Evan, Andrew

AU - McAteer, James A.

AU - Williams, James

AU - Lingeman, James E.

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - Purpose: The Cyberwand (Cybersonics, Erie, Pennsylvania) is a novel intracorporeal lithotrite that uses coaxial ultrasonic elements operating at 2 frequencies. We compared this device to the LithoClast® Ultra, which we previously noted is the most efficient commercially available intracorporeal lithotripsy device. Materials and Methods: An in vitro test system was used to assess the efficiency of stone penetration for the Cyberwand and the LithoClast Ultra. The devices were mounted upright with the probe tip up in a modified irrigation sheath. A gypsum artificial stone was centered on the probe tip and a mass was placed atop the stone to provide a constant force. The manufacturer recommended setting was selected for the Cyberwand, while for the LithoClast Ultra a pneumatic frequency of 12 Hz with an ultrasonic power setting of 100% was selected, representing optimal settings in previous in vitro tests. The time required for complete stone penetration was measured. Differences in mean stone penetration times were compared using ANOVA. Results: Mean ± SD penetration time for the Cyberwand was significantly shorter than for the LithoClast Ultra (4.8 ± 0.6 vs 8.1 ± 0.6 seconds, p <0.0001). Neither device showed any difficulties with overheating, occlusion or another malfunction. Conclusions: Initial assessment using our hands-free in vitro test system, in which stone penetration time is not affected by operator bias, suggests that the Cyberwand is an efficient lithotrite. These promising results justify in vivo testing.

AB - Purpose: The Cyberwand (Cybersonics, Erie, Pennsylvania) is a novel intracorporeal lithotrite that uses coaxial ultrasonic elements operating at 2 frequencies. We compared this device to the LithoClast® Ultra, which we previously noted is the most efficient commercially available intracorporeal lithotripsy device. Materials and Methods: An in vitro test system was used to assess the efficiency of stone penetration for the Cyberwand and the LithoClast Ultra. The devices were mounted upright with the probe tip up in a modified irrigation sheath. A gypsum artificial stone was centered on the probe tip and a mass was placed atop the stone to provide a constant force. The manufacturer recommended setting was selected for the Cyberwand, while for the LithoClast Ultra a pneumatic frequency of 12 Hz with an ultrasonic power setting of 100% was selected, representing optimal settings in previous in vitro tests. The time required for complete stone penetration was measured. Differences in mean stone penetration times were compared using ANOVA. Results: Mean ± SD penetration time for the Cyberwand was significantly shorter than for the LithoClast Ultra (4.8 ± 0.6 vs 8.1 ± 0.6 seconds, p <0.0001). Neither device showed any difficulties with overheating, occlusion or another malfunction. Conclusions: Initial assessment using our hands-free in vitro test system, in which stone penetration time is not affected by operator bias, suggests that the Cyberwand is an efficient lithotrite. These promising results justify in vivo testing.

KW - kidney

KW - kidney calculi

KW - lithotripsy

KW - nephrostomy

KW - percutaneous

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947232648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947232648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.033

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.033

M3 - Article

VL - 177

SP - 1363

EP - 1365

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4

ER -