In vitro assessment of ultrasonic lithotriptors

Ramsay L. Kuo, Ryan F. Paterson, Tibério M. Siqueira, Andrew Evan, James A. McAteer, James Williams, James E. Lingeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Ultrasonic lithotriptors are commonly used to fragment and remove stones during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. To date a comparative assessment of current units has not been accomplished without potential operator bias. An objective testing environment is required for optimal appraisal of the efficiency of ultrasonic lithotriptors. Materials and Methods: An in vitro test system was devised to evaluate the ability of ultrasonic lithotriptors to core through artificial stones. The system consisted of an irrigation sheath (Cook Urological, Spencer, Indiana) through which ultrasonic probes were placed. Ultrasonic hand pieces and probes were secured in an upright position. An Ultracal-30 (U.S. Gypsum, Chicago, Illinois) stone cylinder (mean length 12.8 ± 0.6 mm, mean diameter 7.6 ± 0.07 mm) was centered on the probe tip. A weight (62.7 gm) was placed atop the stone to provide a constant force. We evaluated the Olympus LUS-1 and LUS-2 (Olympus, Melville, New York), Circon-ACMI USL-2000 (Circon-ACMI, Southborough, Massachusetts), Karl Storz Calcuson (Karl Storz, Culver City, California) and Richard Wolf model 2271.004 (Richard Wolf, Vernon Hills, Illinois). All probes had outer diameters of 3.4 mm except for the Circon-ACMI unit (3.8 mm). Using 100% power settings times for complete stone penetration were assessed for all units. Differences in mean stone penetration times were compared using ANOVA. Results: The Olympus LUS-2 had the fastest mean stone penetration time (28.8 ± 2.7 seconds). This value was used to normalize the data into efficiency ratios, where other unit times were expressed as multiples of the LUS-2 time: Olympus LUS-2 (1.0 ± 0.1) equals Circon-ACMI USL-2000 (1.1 ± 0.3) greater than Karl Storz Calcuson (1.4 ± 0.3) greater than Olympus LUS-1 (2.1 ± 0.5) greater than Richard Wolf (3.6 ± 0.8). Efficiencies of the LUS-2 and USL-2000 units were essentially equivalent, with all others significantly less efficient (p <0.05). Conclusions: This new in vitro testing model provides an objective, reproducible method for evaluating the efficiency of intracorporeal lithotriptors. Of the units tested the Olympus LUS-2 and Circon-ACMI USL-2000 were the most efficient.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1101-1104
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume170
Issue number4 I
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2003

Fingerprint

Ultrasonics
Calcium Sulfate
Percutaneous Nephrostomy
Analysis of Variance
Hand
In Vitro Techniques
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • Lithotripsy, ultrasonography
  • Nephrostomy, percutaneous

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Kuo, R. L., Paterson, R. F., Siqueira, T. M., Evan, A., McAteer, J. A., Williams, J., & Lingeman, J. E. (2003). In vitro assessment of ultrasonic lithotriptors. Journal of Urology, 170(4 I), 1101-1104. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000088021.44446.d7

In vitro assessment of ultrasonic lithotriptors. / Kuo, Ramsay L.; Paterson, Ryan F.; Siqueira, Tibério M.; Evan, Andrew; McAteer, James A.; Williams, James; Lingeman, James E.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 170, No. 4 I, 01.10.2003, p. 1101-1104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kuo, RL, Paterson, RF, Siqueira, TM, Evan, A, McAteer, JA, Williams, J & Lingeman, JE 2003, 'In vitro assessment of ultrasonic lithotriptors', Journal of Urology, vol. 170, no. 4 I, pp. 1101-1104. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000088021.44446.d7
Kuo, Ramsay L. ; Paterson, Ryan F. ; Siqueira, Tibério M. ; Evan, Andrew ; McAteer, James A. ; Williams, James ; Lingeman, James E. / In vitro assessment of ultrasonic lithotriptors. In: Journal of Urology. 2003 ; Vol. 170, No. 4 I. pp. 1101-1104.
@article{47ee8ee077a44d6492f7d1919142bc0b,
title = "In vitro assessment of ultrasonic lithotriptors",
abstract = "Purpose: Ultrasonic lithotriptors are commonly used to fragment and remove stones during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. To date a comparative assessment of current units has not been accomplished without potential operator bias. An objective testing environment is required for optimal appraisal of the efficiency of ultrasonic lithotriptors. Materials and Methods: An in vitro test system was devised to evaluate the ability of ultrasonic lithotriptors to core through artificial stones. The system consisted of an irrigation sheath (Cook Urological, Spencer, Indiana) through which ultrasonic probes were placed. Ultrasonic hand pieces and probes were secured in an upright position. An Ultracal-30 (U.S. Gypsum, Chicago, Illinois) stone cylinder (mean length 12.8 ± 0.6 mm, mean diameter 7.6 ± 0.07 mm) was centered on the probe tip. A weight (62.7 gm) was placed atop the stone to provide a constant force. We evaluated the Olympus LUS-1 and LUS-2 (Olympus, Melville, New York), Circon-ACMI USL-2000 (Circon-ACMI, Southborough, Massachusetts), Karl Storz Calcuson (Karl Storz, Culver City, California) and Richard Wolf model 2271.004 (Richard Wolf, Vernon Hills, Illinois). All probes had outer diameters of 3.4 mm except for the Circon-ACMI unit (3.8 mm). Using 100{\%} power settings times for complete stone penetration were assessed for all units. Differences in mean stone penetration times were compared using ANOVA. Results: The Olympus LUS-2 had the fastest mean stone penetration time (28.8 ± 2.7 seconds). This value was used to normalize the data into efficiency ratios, where other unit times were expressed as multiples of the LUS-2 time: Olympus LUS-2 (1.0 ± 0.1) equals Circon-ACMI USL-2000 (1.1 ± 0.3) greater than Karl Storz Calcuson (1.4 ± 0.3) greater than Olympus LUS-1 (2.1 ± 0.5) greater than Richard Wolf (3.6 ± 0.8). Efficiencies of the LUS-2 and USL-2000 units were essentially equivalent, with all others significantly less efficient (p <0.05). Conclusions: This new in vitro testing model provides an objective, reproducible method for evaluating the efficiency of intracorporeal lithotriptors. Of the units tested the Olympus LUS-2 and Circon-ACMI USL-2000 were the most efficient.",
keywords = "Lithotripsy, ultrasonography, Nephrostomy, percutaneous",
author = "Kuo, {Ramsay L.} and Paterson, {Ryan F.} and Siqueira, {Tib{\'e}rio M.} and Andrew Evan and McAteer, {James A.} and James Williams and Lingeman, {James E.}",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.ju.0000088021.44446.d7",
language = "English",
volume = "170",
pages = "1101--1104",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In vitro assessment of ultrasonic lithotriptors

AU - Kuo, Ramsay L.

AU - Paterson, Ryan F.

AU - Siqueira, Tibério M.

AU - Evan, Andrew

AU - McAteer, James A.

AU - Williams, James

AU - Lingeman, James E.

PY - 2003/10/1

Y1 - 2003/10/1

N2 - Purpose: Ultrasonic lithotriptors are commonly used to fragment and remove stones during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. To date a comparative assessment of current units has not been accomplished without potential operator bias. An objective testing environment is required for optimal appraisal of the efficiency of ultrasonic lithotriptors. Materials and Methods: An in vitro test system was devised to evaluate the ability of ultrasonic lithotriptors to core through artificial stones. The system consisted of an irrigation sheath (Cook Urological, Spencer, Indiana) through which ultrasonic probes were placed. Ultrasonic hand pieces and probes were secured in an upright position. An Ultracal-30 (U.S. Gypsum, Chicago, Illinois) stone cylinder (mean length 12.8 ± 0.6 mm, mean diameter 7.6 ± 0.07 mm) was centered on the probe tip. A weight (62.7 gm) was placed atop the stone to provide a constant force. We evaluated the Olympus LUS-1 and LUS-2 (Olympus, Melville, New York), Circon-ACMI USL-2000 (Circon-ACMI, Southborough, Massachusetts), Karl Storz Calcuson (Karl Storz, Culver City, California) and Richard Wolf model 2271.004 (Richard Wolf, Vernon Hills, Illinois). All probes had outer diameters of 3.4 mm except for the Circon-ACMI unit (3.8 mm). Using 100% power settings times for complete stone penetration were assessed for all units. Differences in mean stone penetration times were compared using ANOVA. Results: The Olympus LUS-2 had the fastest mean stone penetration time (28.8 ± 2.7 seconds). This value was used to normalize the data into efficiency ratios, where other unit times were expressed as multiples of the LUS-2 time: Olympus LUS-2 (1.0 ± 0.1) equals Circon-ACMI USL-2000 (1.1 ± 0.3) greater than Karl Storz Calcuson (1.4 ± 0.3) greater than Olympus LUS-1 (2.1 ± 0.5) greater than Richard Wolf (3.6 ± 0.8). Efficiencies of the LUS-2 and USL-2000 units were essentially equivalent, with all others significantly less efficient (p <0.05). Conclusions: This new in vitro testing model provides an objective, reproducible method for evaluating the efficiency of intracorporeal lithotriptors. Of the units tested the Olympus LUS-2 and Circon-ACMI USL-2000 were the most efficient.

AB - Purpose: Ultrasonic lithotriptors are commonly used to fragment and remove stones during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. To date a comparative assessment of current units has not been accomplished without potential operator bias. An objective testing environment is required for optimal appraisal of the efficiency of ultrasonic lithotriptors. Materials and Methods: An in vitro test system was devised to evaluate the ability of ultrasonic lithotriptors to core through artificial stones. The system consisted of an irrigation sheath (Cook Urological, Spencer, Indiana) through which ultrasonic probes were placed. Ultrasonic hand pieces and probes were secured in an upright position. An Ultracal-30 (U.S. Gypsum, Chicago, Illinois) stone cylinder (mean length 12.8 ± 0.6 mm, mean diameter 7.6 ± 0.07 mm) was centered on the probe tip. A weight (62.7 gm) was placed atop the stone to provide a constant force. We evaluated the Olympus LUS-1 and LUS-2 (Olympus, Melville, New York), Circon-ACMI USL-2000 (Circon-ACMI, Southborough, Massachusetts), Karl Storz Calcuson (Karl Storz, Culver City, California) and Richard Wolf model 2271.004 (Richard Wolf, Vernon Hills, Illinois). All probes had outer diameters of 3.4 mm except for the Circon-ACMI unit (3.8 mm). Using 100% power settings times for complete stone penetration were assessed for all units. Differences in mean stone penetration times were compared using ANOVA. Results: The Olympus LUS-2 had the fastest mean stone penetration time (28.8 ± 2.7 seconds). This value was used to normalize the data into efficiency ratios, where other unit times were expressed as multiples of the LUS-2 time: Olympus LUS-2 (1.0 ± 0.1) equals Circon-ACMI USL-2000 (1.1 ± 0.3) greater than Karl Storz Calcuson (1.4 ± 0.3) greater than Olympus LUS-1 (2.1 ± 0.5) greater than Richard Wolf (3.6 ± 0.8). Efficiencies of the LUS-2 and USL-2000 units were essentially equivalent, with all others significantly less efficient (p <0.05). Conclusions: This new in vitro testing model provides an objective, reproducible method for evaluating the efficiency of intracorporeal lithotriptors. Of the units tested the Olympus LUS-2 and Circon-ACMI USL-2000 were the most efficient.

KW - Lithotripsy, ultrasonography

KW - Nephrostomy, percutaneous

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041691166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041691166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.ju.0000088021.44446.d7

DO - 10.1097/01.ju.0000088021.44446.d7

M3 - Article

C2 - 14501701

AN - SCOPUS:0041691166

VL - 170

SP - 1101

EP - 1104

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4 I

ER -