Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation After Atrial Flutter Ablation

Waddah Maskoun, Maria Isabel Pino, Karam Ayoub, Oscar L. Llanos, Ahmed Almomani, Ramez Nairooz, Abdul Hakeem, John Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives This study was conceived to perform a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the available evidence to compute the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after successful atrial flutter (AFL) catheter ablation, defined by targeting for bidirectional block, using different types of follow-up modalities and durations. Background Cavotricuspid-isthmus dependent AFL is usually initiated by short bursts of AF. The incidence of AF after AFL ablation is variable. We evaluated the variation in the reported incidence of AF depending on the type and duration of follow-up, and AF incidence in patients with prior AF versus no prior AF. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies between January 1996 and April 2015 and abstracts in the last 2 years describing patients who underwent AFL ablation and the subsequent incidence of AF was performed. Results Forty-eight studies were included (n = 8,257, ablation success rate: 96%, 79% male). Incidence of new-onset AF correlated with follow-up duration (29% for a weighted mean follow-up duration of 30 months). New-onset AF incidence with <2 years follow-up was 12.4% among group 1 (electrocardiogram and symptoms-driven evaluation, n = 759), 19% for group 2 (outpatient Holter monitoring for 1 day to 7 days/year, n = 315), and 45% for group 3 (>7 days/year Holter monitoring or by implanted cardiac devices, n = 178). Mean follow-up duration was 15.3 months, 18.5 months, and 16.3 months, respectively. In patients with and without prior AF, the incidence for AF after AFL ablation was 35.3% during mean follow-up duration of 29.7 months. In studies with <2 years follow-up duration, AF incidence was 54% in patients with prior AF versus 13.9% without prior AF (odds ratio: 7.43, 95% confidence interval: 4.96 to 11.11; p < 0.00001). In studies with >2 years follow-up duration, AF incidence was 51.3% in patients with prior AF versus 26.2% without prior AF (odds ratio: 2.93, 95% confidence interval: 2.42 to 3.56; p < 0.00001). Conclusions The incidence of AF after AFL ablation is high especially in patients with prior AF when compared to those without prior AF. The detection of AF in patients without prior AF significantly increases with more frequent monitoring and/or longer follow-up duration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)682-690
Number of pages9
JournalJACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume2
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Atrial Flutter
Atrial Fibrillation
Incidence
Meta-Analysis
Ambulatory Electrocardiography

Keywords

  • ablation
  • atrial fibrillation
  • atrial flutter
  • Holter monitor
  • implant loop recorder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Maskoun, W., Pino, M. I., Ayoub, K., Llanos, O. L., Almomani, A., Nairooz, R., ... Miller, J. (2016). Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation After Atrial Flutter Ablation. JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, 2(6), 682-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2016.03.014

Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation After Atrial Flutter Ablation. / Maskoun, Waddah; Pino, Maria Isabel; Ayoub, Karam; Llanos, Oscar L.; Almomani, Ahmed; Nairooz, Ramez; Hakeem, Abdul; Miller, John.

In: JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, Vol. 2, No. 6, 01.11.2016, p. 682-690.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Maskoun, W, Pino, MI, Ayoub, K, Llanos, OL, Almomani, A, Nairooz, R, Hakeem, A & Miller, J 2016, 'Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation After Atrial Flutter Ablation', JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 682-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2016.03.014
Maskoun W, Pino MI, Ayoub K, Llanos OL, Almomani A, Nairooz R et al. Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation After Atrial Flutter Ablation. JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. 2016 Nov 1;2(6):682-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2016.03.014
Maskoun, Waddah ; Pino, Maria Isabel ; Ayoub, Karam ; Llanos, Oscar L. ; Almomani, Ahmed ; Nairooz, Ramez ; Hakeem, Abdul ; Miller, John. / Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation After Atrial Flutter Ablation. In: JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. 2016 ; Vol. 2, No. 6. pp. 682-690.
@article{32845051563440559c80b073dbf78546,
title = "Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation After Atrial Flutter Ablation",
abstract = "Objectives This study was conceived to perform a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the available evidence to compute the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after successful atrial flutter (AFL) catheter ablation, defined by targeting for bidirectional block, using different types of follow-up modalities and durations. Background Cavotricuspid-isthmus dependent AFL is usually initiated by short bursts of AF. The incidence of AF after AFL ablation is variable. We evaluated the variation in the reported incidence of AF depending on the type and duration of follow-up, and AF incidence in patients with prior AF versus no prior AF. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies between January 1996 and April 2015 and abstracts in the last 2 years describing patients who underwent AFL ablation and the subsequent incidence of AF was performed. Results Forty-eight studies were included (n = 8,257, ablation success rate: 96{\%}, 79{\%} male). Incidence of new-onset AF correlated with follow-up duration (29{\%} for a weighted mean follow-up duration of 30 months). New-onset AF incidence with <2 years follow-up was 12.4{\%} among group 1 (electrocardiogram and symptoms-driven evaluation, n = 759), 19{\%} for group 2 (outpatient Holter monitoring for 1 day to 7 days/year, n = 315), and 45{\%} for group 3 (>7 days/year Holter monitoring or by implanted cardiac devices, n = 178). Mean follow-up duration was 15.3 months, 18.5 months, and 16.3 months, respectively. In patients with and without prior AF, the incidence for AF after AFL ablation was 35.3{\%} during mean follow-up duration of 29.7 months. In studies with <2 years follow-up duration, AF incidence was 54{\%} in patients with prior AF versus 13.9{\%} without prior AF (odds ratio: 7.43, 95{\%} confidence interval: 4.96 to 11.11; p < 0.00001). In studies with >2 years follow-up duration, AF incidence was 51.3{\%} in patients with prior AF versus 26.2{\%} without prior AF (odds ratio: 2.93, 95{\%} confidence interval: 2.42 to 3.56; p < 0.00001). Conclusions The incidence of AF after AFL ablation is high especially in patients with prior AF when compared to those without prior AF. The detection of AF in patients without prior AF significantly increases with more frequent monitoring and/or longer follow-up duration.",
keywords = "ablation, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, Holter monitor, implant loop recorder",
author = "Waddah Maskoun and Pino, {Maria Isabel} and Karam Ayoub and Llanos, {Oscar L.} and Ahmed Almomani and Ramez Nairooz and Abdul Hakeem and John Miller",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacep.2016.03.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "682--690",
journal = "JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology",
issn = "2405-5018",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation After Atrial Flutter Ablation

AU - Maskoun, Waddah

AU - Pino, Maria Isabel

AU - Ayoub, Karam

AU - Llanos, Oscar L.

AU - Almomani, Ahmed

AU - Nairooz, Ramez

AU - Hakeem, Abdul

AU - Miller, John

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Objectives This study was conceived to perform a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the available evidence to compute the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after successful atrial flutter (AFL) catheter ablation, defined by targeting for bidirectional block, using different types of follow-up modalities and durations. Background Cavotricuspid-isthmus dependent AFL is usually initiated by short bursts of AF. The incidence of AF after AFL ablation is variable. We evaluated the variation in the reported incidence of AF depending on the type and duration of follow-up, and AF incidence in patients with prior AF versus no prior AF. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies between January 1996 and April 2015 and abstracts in the last 2 years describing patients who underwent AFL ablation and the subsequent incidence of AF was performed. Results Forty-eight studies were included (n = 8,257, ablation success rate: 96%, 79% male). Incidence of new-onset AF correlated with follow-up duration (29% for a weighted mean follow-up duration of 30 months). New-onset AF incidence with <2 years follow-up was 12.4% among group 1 (electrocardiogram and symptoms-driven evaluation, n = 759), 19% for group 2 (outpatient Holter monitoring for 1 day to 7 days/year, n = 315), and 45% for group 3 (>7 days/year Holter monitoring or by implanted cardiac devices, n = 178). Mean follow-up duration was 15.3 months, 18.5 months, and 16.3 months, respectively. In patients with and without prior AF, the incidence for AF after AFL ablation was 35.3% during mean follow-up duration of 29.7 months. In studies with <2 years follow-up duration, AF incidence was 54% in patients with prior AF versus 13.9% without prior AF (odds ratio: 7.43, 95% confidence interval: 4.96 to 11.11; p < 0.00001). In studies with >2 years follow-up duration, AF incidence was 51.3% in patients with prior AF versus 26.2% without prior AF (odds ratio: 2.93, 95% confidence interval: 2.42 to 3.56; p < 0.00001). Conclusions The incidence of AF after AFL ablation is high especially in patients with prior AF when compared to those without prior AF. The detection of AF in patients without prior AF significantly increases with more frequent monitoring and/or longer follow-up duration.

AB - Objectives This study was conceived to perform a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the available evidence to compute the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after successful atrial flutter (AFL) catheter ablation, defined by targeting for bidirectional block, using different types of follow-up modalities and durations. Background Cavotricuspid-isthmus dependent AFL is usually initiated by short bursts of AF. The incidence of AF after AFL ablation is variable. We evaluated the variation in the reported incidence of AF depending on the type and duration of follow-up, and AF incidence in patients with prior AF versus no prior AF. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies between January 1996 and April 2015 and abstracts in the last 2 years describing patients who underwent AFL ablation and the subsequent incidence of AF was performed. Results Forty-eight studies were included (n = 8,257, ablation success rate: 96%, 79% male). Incidence of new-onset AF correlated with follow-up duration (29% for a weighted mean follow-up duration of 30 months). New-onset AF incidence with <2 years follow-up was 12.4% among group 1 (electrocardiogram and symptoms-driven evaluation, n = 759), 19% for group 2 (outpatient Holter monitoring for 1 day to 7 days/year, n = 315), and 45% for group 3 (>7 days/year Holter monitoring or by implanted cardiac devices, n = 178). Mean follow-up duration was 15.3 months, 18.5 months, and 16.3 months, respectively. In patients with and without prior AF, the incidence for AF after AFL ablation was 35.3% during mean follow-up duration of 29.7 months. In studies with <2 years follow-up duration, AF incidence was 54% in patients with prior AF versus 13.9% without prior AF (odds ratio: 7.43, 95% confidence interval: 4.96 to 11.11; p < 0.00001). In studies with >2 years follow-up duration, AF incidence was 51.3% in patients with prior AF versus 26.2% without prior AF (odds ratio: 2.93, 95% confidence interval: 2.42 to 3.56; p < 0.00001). Conclusions The incidence of AF after AFL ablation is high especially in patients with prior AF when compared to those without prior AF. The detection of AF in patients without prior AF significantly increases with more frequent monitoring and/or longer follow-up duration.

KW - ablation

KW - atrial fibrillation

KW - atrial flutter

KW - Holter monitor

KW - implant loop recorder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996866072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84996866072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.03.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.03.014

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84996866072

VL - 2

SP - 682

EP - 690

JO - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology

JF - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology

SN - 2405-5018

IS - 6

ER -