Including ultrasound scans in antenatal care in low-resource settings: Considering the complementarity of obstetric ultrasound screening and maternity waiting homes in strengthening referral systems in low-resource, rural settings

David L. Swanson, Holly L. Franklin, Jonathan O. Swanson, Robert L. Goldenberg, Elizabeth M. McClure, Waseem Mirza, David Muyodi, Lester Figueroa, Nicole Goldsmith, Nancy Kanaiza, Farnaz Naqvi, Irma Sayury Pineda, Walter López-Gomez, Dorothy Hamsumonde, Victor Lokomba Bolamba, Jamie E. Newman, Elizabeth V. Fogleman, Sarah Saleem, Fabian Esamai, Sherri BucherEdward A. Liechty, Ana L. Garces, Nancy F. Krebs, K. Michael Hambidge, Elwyn Chomba, Melissa Bauserman, Musaku Mwenechanya, Waldemar A. Carlo, Antoinette Tshefu, Adrien Lokangaka, Carl L. Bose, Robert O. Nathan

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Recent World Health Organization (WHO) antenatal care recommendations include an ultrasound scan as a part of routine antenatal care. The First Look Study, referenced in the WHO recommendation, subsequently shows that the routine use of ultrasound during antenatal care in rural, low-income settings did not improve maternal, fetal or neonatal mortality, nor did it increase women's use of antenatal care or the rate of hospital births. This article reviews the First Look Study, reconsidering the assumptions upon which it was built in light of these results, a supplemental descriptive study of interviews with patients and sonographers that participated in the First Look study intervention, and a review of the literature. Two themes surface from this review. The first is that focused emphasis on building the pregnancy risk screening skills of rural primary health care personnel may not lead to adaptations in referral hospital processes that could benefit the patient accordingly. The second is that agency to improve the quality of patient reception at referral hospitals may need to be manufactured for obstetric ultrasound screening, or remote pregnancy risk screening more generally, to have the desired impact. Stemming from the literature, this article goes on to examine the potential for complementarity between obstetric ultrasound screening and another approach encouraged by the WHO, the maternity waiting home. Each approach may address existing shortcomings in how the other is currently understood. This paper concludes by proposing a path toward developing and testing such a hybrid approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSeminars in Perinatology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Prenatal Care
Obstetrics
Referral and Consultation
Fetal Mortality
Rural Health
Pregnancy
Maternal Mortality
Birth Rate
Infant Mortality
Health Personnel
Primary Health Care
Interviews

Keywords

  • Continuum of care
  • Maternity waiting home
  • Midwifery
  • Pregnancy risk screening
  • Referral systems
  • Task shifting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Including ultrasound scans in antenatal care in low-resource settings : Considering the complementarity of obstetric ultrasound screening and maternity waiting homes in strengthening referral systems in low-resource, rural settings. / Swanson, David L.; Franklin, Holly L.; Swanson, Jonathan O.; Goldenberg, Robert L.; McClure, Elizabeth M.; Mirza, Waseem; Muyodi, David; Figueroa, Lester; Goldsmith, Nicole; Kanaiza, Nancy; Naqvi, Farnaz; Pineda, Irma Sayury; López-Gomez, Walter; Hamsumonde, Dorothy; Bolamba, Victor Lokomba; Newman, Jamie E.; Fogleman, Elizabeth V.; Saleem, Sarah; Esamai, Fabian; Bucher, Sherri; Liechty, Edward A.; Garces, Ana L.; Krebs, Nancy F.; Hambidge, K. Michael; Chomba, Elwyn; Bauserman, Melissa; Mwenechanya, Musaku; Carlo, Waldemar A.; Tshefu, Antoinette; Lokangaka, Adrien; Bose, Carl L.; Nathan, Robert O.

In: Seminars in Perinatology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Swanson, DL, Franklin, HL, Swanson, JO, Goldenberg, RL, McClure, EM, Mirza, W, Muyodi, D, Figueroa, L, Goldsmith, N, Kanaiza, N, Naqvi, F, Pineda, IS, López-Gomez, W, Hamsumonde, D, Bolamba, VL, Newman, JE, Fogleman, EV, Saleem, S, Esamai, F, Bucher, S, Liechty, EA, Garces, AL, Krebs, NF, Hambidge, KM, Chomba, E, Bauserman, M, Mwenechanya, M, Carlo, WA, Tshefu, A, Lokangaka, A, Bose, CL & Nathan, RO 2019, 'Including ultrasound scans in antenatal care in low-resource settings: Considering the complementarity of obstetric ultrasound screening and maternity waiting homes in strengthening referral systems in low-resource, rural settings', Seminars in Perinatology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2019.03.017
Swanson, David L. ; Franklin, Holly L. ; Swanson, Jonathan O. ; Goldenberg, Robert L. ; McClure, Elizabeth M. ; Mirza, Waseem ; Muyodi, David ; Figueroa, Lester ; Goldsmith, Nicole ; Kanaiza, Nancy ; Naqvi, Farnaz ; Pineda, Irma Sayury ; López-Gomez, Walter ; Hamsumonde, Dorothy ; Bolamba, Victor Lokomba ; Newman, Jamie E. ; Fogleman, Elizabeth V. ; Saleem, Sarah ; Esamai, Fabian ; Bucher, Sherri ; Liechty, Edward A. ; Garces, Ana L. ; Krebs, Nancy F. ; Hambidge, K. Michael ; Chomba, Elwyn ; Bauserman, Melissa ; Mwenechanya, Musaku ; Carlo, Waldemar A. ; Tshefu, Antoinette ; Lokangaka, Adrien ; Bose, Carl L. ; Nathan, Robert O. / Including ultrasound scans in antenatal care in low-resource settings : Considering the complementarity of obstetric ultrasound screening and maternity waiting homes in strengthening referral systems in low-resource, rural settings. In: Seminars in Perinatology. 2019.
@article{d56f6d568f0b48858eafe5edc2acf067,
title = "Including ultrasound scans in antenatal care in low-resource settings: Considering the complementarity of obstetric ultrasound screening and maternity waiting homes in strengthening referral systems in low-resource, rural settings",
abstract = "Recent World Health Organization (WHO) antenatal care recommendations include an ultrasound scan as a part of routine antenatal care. The First Look Study, referenced in the WHO recommendation, subsequently shows that the routine use of ultrasound during antenatal care in rural, low-income settings did not improve maternal, fetal or neonatal mortality, nor did it increase women's use of antenatal care or the rate of hospital births. This article reviews the First Look Study, reconsidering the assumptions upon which it was built in light of these results, a supplemental descriptive study of interviews with patients and sonographers that participated in the First Look study intervention, and a review of the literature. Two themes surface from this review. The first is that focused emphasis on building the pregnancy risk screening skills of rural primary health care personnel may not lead to adaptations in referral hospital processes that could benefit the patient accordingly. The second is that agency to improve the quality of patient reception at referral hospitals may need to be manufactured for obstetric ultrasound screening, or remote pregnancy risk screening more generally, to have the desired impact. Stemming from the literature, this article goes on to examine the potential for complementarity between obstetric ultrasound screening and another approach encouraged by the WHO, the maternity waiting home. Each approach may address existing shortcomings in how the other is currently understood. This paper concludes by proposing a path toward developing and testing such a hybrid approach.",
keywords = "Continuum of care, Maternity waiting home, Midwifery, Pregnancy risk screening, Referral systems, Task shifting",
author = "Swanson, {David L.} and Franklin, {Holly L.} and Swanson, {Jonathan O.} and Goldenberg, {Robert L.} and McClure, {Elizabeth M.} and Waseem Mirza and David Muyodi and Lester Figueroa and Nicole Goldsmith and Nancy Kanaiza and Farnaz Naqvi and Pineda, {Irma Sayury} and Walter L{\'o}pez-Gomez and Dorothy Hamsumonde and Bolamba, {Victor Lokomba} and Newman, {Jamie E.} and Fogleman, {Elizabeth V.} and Sarah Saleem and Fabian Esamai and Sherri Bucher and Liechty, {Edward A.} and Garces, {Ana L.} and Krebs, {Nancy F.} and Hambidge, {K. Michael} and Elwyn Chomba and Melissa Bauserman and Musaku Mwenechanya and Carlo, {Waldemar A.} and Antoinette Tshefu and Adrien Lokangaka and Bose, {Carl L.} and Nathan, {Robert O.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/j.semperi.2019.03.017",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Seminars in Perinatology",
issn = "0146-0005",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Including ultrasound scans in antenatal care in low-resource settings

T2 - Considering the complementarity of obstetric ultrasound screening and maternity waiting homes in strengthening referral systems in low-resource, rural settings

AU - Swanson, David L.

AU - Franklin, Holly L.

AU - Swanson, Jonathan O.

AU - Goldenberg, Robert L.

AU - McClure, Elizabeth M.

AU - Mirza, Waseem

AU - Muyodi, David

AU - Figueroa, Lester

AU - Goldsmith, Nicole

AU - Kanaiza, Nancy

AU - Naqvi, Farnaz

AU - Pineda, Irma Sayury

AU - López-Gomez, Walter

AU - Hamsumonde, Dorothy

AU - Bolamba, Victor Lokomba

AU - Newman, Jamie E.

AU - Fogleman, Elizabeth V.

AU - Saleem, Sarah

AU - Esamai, Fabian

AU - Bucher, Sherri

AU - Liechty, Edward A.

AU - Garces, Ana L.

AU - Krebs, Nancy F.

AU - Hambidge, K. Michael

AU - Chomba, Elwyn

AU - Bauserman, Melissa

AU - Mwenechanya, Musaku

AU - Carlo, Waldemar A.

AU - Tshefu, Antoinette

AU - Lokangaka, Adrien

AU - Bose, Carl L.

AU - Nathan, Robert O.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Recent World Health Organization (WHO) antenatal care recommendations include an ultrasound scan as a part of routine antenatal care. The First Look Study, referenced in the WHO recommendation, subsequently shows that the routine use of ultrasound during antenatal care in rural, low-income settings did not improve maternal, fetal or neonatal mortality, nor did it increase women's use of antenatal care or the rate of hospital births. This article reviews the First Look Study, reconsidering the assumptions upon which it was built in light of these results, a supplemental descriptive study of interviews with patients and sonographers that participated in the First Look study intervention, and a review of the literature. Two themes surface from this review. The first is that focused emphasis on building the pregnancy risk screening skills of rural primary health care personnel may not lead to adaptations in referral hospital processes that could benefit the patient accordingly. The second is that agency to improve the quality of patient reception at referral hospitals may need to be manufactured for obstetric ultrasound screening, or remote pregnancy risk screening more generally, to have the desired impact. Stemming from the literature, this article goes on to examine the potential for complementarity between obstetric ultrasound screening and another approach encouraged by the WHO, the maternity waiting home. Each approach may address existing shortcomings in how the other is currently understood. This paper concludes by proposing a path toward developing and testing such a hybrid approach.

AB - Recent World Health Organization (WHO) antenatal care recommendations include an ultrasound scan as a part of routine antenatal care. The First Look Study, referenced in the WHO recommendation, subsequently shows that the routine use of ultrasound during antenatal care in rural, low-income settings did not improve maternal, fetal or neonatal mortality, nor did it increase women's use of antenatal care or the rate of hospital births. This article reviews the First Look Study, reconsidering the assumptions upon which it was built in light of these results, a supplemental descriptive study of interviews with patients and sonographers that participated in the First Look study intervention, and a review of the literature. Two themes surface from this review. The first is that focused emphasis on building the pregnancy risk screening skills of rural primary health care personnel may not lead to adaptations in referral hospital processes that could benefit the patient accordingly. The second is that agency to improve the quality of patient reception at referral hospitals may need to be manufactured for obstetric ultrasound screening, or remote pregnancy risk screening more generally, to have the desired impact. Stemming from the literature, this article goes on to examine the potential for complementarity between obstetric ultrasound screening and another approach encouraged by the WHO, the maternity waiting home. Each approach may address existing shortcomings in how the other is currently understood. This paper concludes by proposing a path toward developing and testing such a hybrid approach.

KW - Continuum of care

KW - Maternity waiting home

KW - Midwifery

KW - Pregnancy risk screening

KW - Referral systems

KW - Task shifting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064080353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064080353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.semperi.2019.03.017

DO - 10.1053/j.semperi.2019.03.017

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30979599

AN - SCOPUS:85064080353

JO - Seminars in Perinatology

JF - Seminars in Perinatology

SN - 0146-0005

ER -