Individual and practice differences among physicians who perform ERCP at varying frequency: A national survey

Gregory A. Coté, Rajesh N. Keswani, Tina Jackson, Evan Fogel, Glen Lehman, Lee McHenry, James Watkins, Stuart Sherman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: ERCP practice patterns in the United States are largely unknown. Objective: To characterize the ERCP practice of U.S. gastroenterologists, stratified by their annual case volume: high volume (HV, >200), moderate volume (MV, 50-200), and low volume (LV, <50). Design: Anonymous electronic survey. Subjects: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy members who are practicing U.S. gastroenterologists. Results: Among all responders (N = 1006), 63% were derived from community practices. Physicians who performed ERCPs and provided data on annual volume (n = 669) were classified as LV (n = 254), MV (n = 284), and HV (n = 131). During training, 77% of LV physicians did not complete 180 ERCPs compared with 58% of MV and 34% of HV physicians (P < .0001). Only 58% of LV physicians enjoy performing ERCP compared with 88% of MV and 98% of HV physicians (P < .0001); 60% reported being "very comfortable" with ERCP compared with more than 90% of MV and HV physicians (P < .0001). LV physicians are less comfortable with pancreatic duct stenting (PDS) (57% vs 92% [MV] and 98% [HV], P ≤ .02) and using prophylactic PDS. Although HV physicians (42%) were least likely to use short-wire devices (P < .02), use of wire-guided cannulation was similar (74% LV, 72% MV, 66% HV, P = .13). Thirty-seven percent of LV physicians reported comfort with needle-knife sphincterotomy compared with 75% (MV) and 99% (HV) (P < .0001). Limitations: Survey completion rate of 18.5%. Conclusions: Self-reported comfort and/or enjoyment with ERCP is lower among LV physicians. Wire-guided cannulation is used by the majority of all ERCP practitioners, but prophylactic PDS is less frequently used by LV physicians. Because many LV physicians perform ERCP for higher-grade indications and use advanced techniques (eg, needle-knife sphincterotomy), further LV physician ERCP outcomes data are needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-73
Number of pages9
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume74
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Individuality
Physicians
Pancreatic Ducts
Catheterization
Surveys and Questionnaires
Needles
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Individual and practice differences among physicians who perform ERCP at varying frequency : A national survey. / Coté, Gregory A.; Keswani, Rajesh N.; Jackson, Tina; Fogel, Evan; Lehman, Glen; McHenry, Lee; Watkins, James; Sherman, Stuart.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 74, No. 1, 07.2011, p. 65-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da3c6d2fdc1e440ba3e4ec721922e747,
title = "Individual and practice differences among physicians who perform ERCP at varying frequency: A national survey",
abstract = "Background: ERCP practice patterns in the United States are largely unknown. Objective: To characterize the ERCP practice of U.S. gastroenterologists, stratified by their annual case volume: high volume (HV, >200), moderate volume (MV, 50-200), and low volume (LV, <50). Design: Anonymous electronic survey. Subjects: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy members who are practicing U.S. gastroenterologists. Results: Among all responders (N = 1006), 63{\%} were derived from community practices. Physicians who performed ERCPs and provided data on annual volume (n = 669) were classified as LV (n = 254), MV (n = 284), and HV (n = 131). During training, 77{\%} of LV physicians did not complete 180 ERCPs compared with 58{\%} of MV and 34{\%} of HV physicians (P < .0001). Only 58{\%} of LV physicians enjoy performing ERCP compared with 88{\%} of MV and 98{\%} of HV physicians (P < .0001); 60{\%} reported being {"}very comfortable{"} with ERCP compared with more than 90{\%} of MV and HV physicians (P < .0001). LV physicians are less comfortable with pancreatic duct stenting (PDS) (57{\%} vs 92{\%} [MV] and 98{\%} [HV], P ≤ .02) and using prophylactic PDS. Although HV physicians (42{\%}) were least likely to use short-wire devices (P < .02), use of wire-guided cannulation was similar (74{\%} LV, 72{\%} MV, 66{\%} HV, P = .13). Thirty-seven percent of LV physicians reported comfort with needle-knife sphincterotomy compared with 75{\%} (MV) and 99{\%} (HV) (P < .0001). Limitations: Survey completion rate of 18.5{\%}. Conclusions: Self-reported comfort and/or enjoyment with ERCP is lower among LV physicians. Wire-guided cannulation is used by the majority of all ERCP practitioners, but prophylactic PDS is less frequently used by LV physicians. Because many LV physicians perform ERCP for higher-grade indications and use advanced techniques (eg, needle-knife sphincterotomy), further LV physician ERCP outcomes data are needed.",
author = "Cot{\'e}, {Gregory A.} and Keswani, {Rajesh N.} and Tina Jackson and Evan Fogel and Glen Lehman and Lee McHenry and James Watkins and Stuart Sherman",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.072",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "65--73",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual and practice differences among physicians who perform ERCP at varying frequency

T2 - A national survey

AU - Coté, Gregory A.

AU - Keswani, Rajesh N.

AU - Jackson, Tina

AU - Fogel, Evan

AU - Lehman, Glen

AU - McHenry, Lee

AU - Watkins, James

AU - Sherman, Stuart

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Background: ERCP practice patterns in the United States are largely unknown. Objective: To characterize the ERCP practice of U.S. gastroenterologists, stratified by their annual case volume: high volume (HV, >200), moderate volume (MV, 50-200), and low volume (LV, <50). Design: Anonymous electronic survey. Subjects: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy members who are practicing U.S. gastroenterologists. Results: Among all responders (N = 1006), 63% were derived from community practices. Physicians who performed ERCPs and provided data on annual volume (n = 669) were classified as LV (n = 254), MV (n = 284), and HV (n = 131). During training, 77% of LV physicians did not complete 180 ERCPs compared with 58% of MV and 34% of HV physicians (P < .0001). Only 58% of LV physicians enjoy performing ERCP compared with 88% of MV and 98% of HV physicians (P < .0001); 60% reported being "very comfortable" with ERCP compared with more than 90% of MV and HV physicians (P < .0001). LV physicians are less comfortable with pancreatic duct stenting (PDS) (57% vs 92% [MV] and 98% [HV], P ≤ .02) and using prophylactic PDS. Although HV physicians (42%) were least likely to use short-wire devices (P < .02), use of wire-guided cannulation was similar (74% LV, 72% MV, 66% HV, P = .13). Thirty-seven percent of LV physicians reported comfort with needle-knife sphincterotomy compared with 75% (MV) and 99% (HV) (P < .0001). Limitations: Survey completion rate of 18.5%. Conclusions: Self-reported comfort and/or enjoyment with ERCP is lower among LV physicians. Wire-guided cannulation is used by the majority of all ERCP practitioners, but prophylactic PDS is less frequently used by LV physicians. Because many LV physicians perform ERCP for higher-grade indications and use advanced techniques (eg, needle-knife sphincterotomy), further LV physician ERCP outcomes data are needed.

AB - Background: ERCP practice patterns in the United States are largely unknown. Objective: To characterize the ERCP practice of U.S. gastroenterologists, stratified by their annual case volume: high volume (HV, >200), moderate volume (MV, 50-200), and low volume (LV, <50). Design: Anonymous electronic survey. Subjects: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy members who are practicing U.S. gastroenterologists. Results: Among all responders (N = 1006), 63% were derived from community practices. Physicians who performed ERCPs and provided data on annual volume (n = 669) were classified as LV (n = 254), MV (n = 284), and HV (n = 131). During training, 77% of LV physicians did not complete 180 ERCPs compared with 58% of MV and 34% of HV physicians (P < .0001). Only 58% of LV physicians enjoy performing ERCP compared with 88% of MV and 98% of HV physicians (P < .0001); 60% reported being "very comfortable" with ERCP compared with more than 90% of MV and HV physicians (P < .0001). LV physicians are less comfortable with pancreatic duct stenting (PDS) (57% vs 92% [MV] and 98% [HV], P ≤ .02) and using prophylactic PDS. Although HV physicians (42%) were least likely to use short-wire devices (P < .02), use of wire-guided cannulation was similar (74% LV, 72% MV, 66% HV, P = .13). Thirty-seven percent of LV physicians reported comfort with needle-knife sphincterotomy compared with 75% (MV) and 99% (HV) (P < .0001). Limitations: Survey completion rate of 18.5%. Conclusions: Self-reported comfort and/or enjoyment with ERCP is lower among LV physicians. Wire-guided cannulation is used by the majority of all ERCP practitioners, but prophylactic PDS is less frequently used by LV physicians. Because many LV physicians perform ERCP for higher-grade indications and use advanced techniques (eg, needle-knife sphincterotomy), further LV physician ERCP outcomes data are needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959738190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959738190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.072

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.072

M3 - Article

C2 - 21492851

AN - SCOPUS:79959738190

VL - 74

SP - 65

EP - 73

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 1

ER -