Influence of fluoride availability of dentifrices on eroded enamel remineralization in situ

Anderson Hara, S. A. Kelly, C. González-Cabezas, G. J. Eckert, A. P. Barlow, S. C. Mason, Domenick Zero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Remineralization of eroded enamel by dentifrices containing similar sources/concentrations of fluoride was investigated in situ. Fifty-three subjects completed a double-blind crossover study with 3 randomly assigned dentifrice treatments: placebo (0 ppm F, PD); reference (1,450 ppm NaF, RD) and test (1,450 ppm NaF + 5% KNO3, TD). Fluoride availability for each dentifrice was analyzed in vitro by standard tests (1-min fluoride release rate and enamel fluoride uptake). The subjects wore palatal appliances holding bovine enamel specimens previously eroded in vitro. Surface microhardness was determined before and after the in vitro erosive challenge, after in situ remineralization and after a second in vitro erosive challenge. ANOVA and pairwise comparisons were performed (α = 0.05). TD was superior to RD in the fluoride release tests, but similar to RD in the enamel fluoride uptake test. The mean percent surface microhardness recovery was 21.9 (standard deviation 8.0) for PD, 28.6 (8.0) for RD and 36.0 (8.0) for TD. The mean percent relative erosion resistance change was -58.8 (12.7) for PD, -31.3 (12.7) for RD and -27.3 (12.6) for TD. Both fluoride-containing dentifrices provided superior remineralization (p <0.001) and erosion resistance (p <0.001) compared to PD. The percent surface microhardness recovery demonstrated by the TD was significantly greater than for the RD (p <0.001). There was no significant difference (p = 0.073) between TD and RD in relative resistance to further erosive challenge. The results suggest that fluoride availability may be different in dentifrices with similar sources/concentrations of fluoride, providing different levels of remineralization of eroded enamel.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-63
Number of pages7
JournalCaries Research
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

Dentifrices
Dental Enamel
Fluorides
Double-Blind Method
Cross-Over Studies
Analysis of Variance
Placebos

Keywords

  • Dentifrice
  • Erosion
  • Remineralization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Hara, A., Kelly, S. A., González-Cabezas, C., Eckert, G. J., Barlow, A. P., Mason, S. C., & Zero, D. (2009). Influence of fluoride availability of dentifrices on eroded enamel remineralization in situ. Caries Research, 43(1), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1159/000201591

Influence of fluoride availability of dentifrices on eroded enamel remineralization in situ. / Hara, Anderson; Kelly, S. A.; González-Cabezas, C.; Eckert, G. J.; Barlow, A. P.; Mason, S. C.; Zero, Domenick.

In: Caries Research, Vol. 43, No. 1, 03.2009, p. 57-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hara, A, Kelly, SA, González-Cabezas, C, Eckert, GJ, Barlow, AP, Mason, SC & Zero, D 2009, 'Influence of fluoride availability of dentifrices on eroded enamel remineralization in situ', Caries Research, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1159/000201591
Hara A, Kelly SA, González-Cabezas C, Eckert GJ, Barlow AP, Mason SC et al. Influence of fluoride availability of dentifrices on eroded enamel remineralization in situ. Caries Research. 2009 Mar;43(1):57-63. https://doi.org/10.1159/000201591
Hara, Anderson ; Kelly, S. A. ; González-Cabezas, C. ; Eckert, G. J. ; Barlow, A. P. ; Mason, S. C. ; Zero, Domenick. / Influence of fluoride availability of dentifrices on eroded enamel remineralization in situ. In: Caries Research. 2009 ; Vol. 43, No. 1. pp. 57-63.
@article{a0c2581b183a4bd5b0bdc537f164c32d,
title = "Influence of fluoride availability of dentifrices on eroded enamel remineralization in situ",
abstract = "Remineralization of eroded enamel by dentifrices containing similar sources/concentrations of fluoride was investigated in situ. Fifty-three subjects completed a double-blind crossover study with 3 randomly assigned dentifrice treatments: placebo (0 ppm F, PD); reference (1,450 ppm NaF, RD) and test (1,450 ppm NaF + 5{\%} KNO3, TD). Fluoride availability for each dentifrice was analyzed in vitro by standard tests (1-min fluoride release rate and enamel fluoride uptake). The subjects wore palatal appliances holding bovine enamel specimens previously eroded in vitro. Surface microhardness was determined before and after the in vitro erosive challenge, after in situ remineralization and after a second in vitro erosive challenge. ANOVA and pairwise comparisons were performed (α = 0.05). TD was superior to RD in the fluoride release tests, but similar to RD in the enamel fluoride uptake test. The mean percent surface microhardness recovery was 21.9 (standard deviation 8.0) for PD, 28.6 (8.0) for RD and 36.0 (8.0) for TD. The mean percent relative erosion resistance change was -58.8 (12.7) for PD, -31.3 (12.7) for RD and -27.3 (12.6) for TD. Both fluoride-containing dentifrices provided superior remineralization (p <0.001) and erosion resistance (p <0.001) compared to PD. The percent surface microhardness recovery demonstrated by the TD was significantly greater than for the RD (p <0.001). There was no significant difference (p = 0.073) between TD and RD in relative resistance to further erosive challenge. The results suggest that fluoride availability may be different in dentifrices with similar sources/concentrations of fluoride, providing different levels of remineralization of eroded enamel.",
keywords = "Dentifrice, Erosion, Remineralization",
author = "Anderson Hara and Kelly, {S. A.} and C. Gonz{\'a}lez-Cabezas and Eckert, {G. J.} and Barlow, {A. P.} and Mason, {S. C.} and Domenick Zero",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1159/000201591",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "57--63",
journal = "Caries Research",
issn = "0008-6568",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of fluoride availability of dentifrices on eroded enamel remineralization in situ

AU - Hara, Anderson

AU - Kelly, S. A.

AU - González-Cabezas, C.

AU - Eckert, G. J.

AU - Barlow, A. P.

AU - Mason, S. C.

AU - Zero, Domenick

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Remineralization of eroded enamel by dentifrices containing similar sources/concentrations of fluoride was investigated in situ. Fifty-three subjects completed a double-blind crossover study with 3 randomly assigned dentifrice treatments: placebo (0 ppm F, PD); reference (1,450 ppm NaF, RD) and test (1,450 ppm NaF + 5% KNO3, TD). Fluoride availability for each dentifrice was analyzed in vitro by standard tests (1-min fluoride release rate and enamel fluoride uptake). The subjects wore palatal appliances holding bovine enamel specimens previously eroded in vitro. Surface microhardness was determined before and after the in vitro erosive challenge, after in situ remineralization and after a second in vitro erosive challenge. ANOVA and pairwise comparisons were performed (α = 0.05). TD was superior to RD in the fluoride release tests, but similar to RD in the enamel fluoride uptake test. The mean percent surface microhardness recovery was 21.9 (standard deviation 8.0) for PD, 28.6 (8.0) for RD and 36.0 (8.0) for TD. The mean percent relative erosion resistance change was -58.8 (12.7) for PD, -31.3 (12.7) for RD and -27.3 (12.6) for TD. Both fluoride-containing dentifrices provided superior remineralization (p <0.001) and erosion resistance (p <0.001) compared to PD. The percent surface microhardness recovery demonstrated by the TD was significantly greater than for the RD (p <0.001). There was no significant difference (p = 0.073) between TD and RD in relative resistance to further erosive challenge. The results suggest that fluoride availability may be different in dentifrices with similar sources/concentrations of fluoride, providing different levels of remineralization of eroded enamel.

AB - Remineralization of eroded enamel by dentifrices containing similar sources/concentrations of fluoride was investigated in situ. Fifty-three subjects completed a double-blind crossover study with 3 randomly assigned dentifrice treatments: placebo (0 ppm F, PD); reference (1,450 ppm NaF, RD) and test (1,450 ppm NaF + 5% KNO3, TD). Fluoride availability for each dentifrice was analyzed in vitro by standard tests (1-min fluoride release rate and enamel fluoride uptake). The subjects wore palatal appliances holding bovine enamel specimens previously eroded in vitro. Surface microhardness was determined before and after the in vitro erosive challenge, after in situ remineralization and after a second in vitro erosive challenge. ANOVA and pairwise comparisons were performed (α = 0.05). TD was superior to RD in the fluoride release tests, but similar to RD in the enamel fluoride uptake test. The mean percent surface microhardness recovery was 21.9 (standard deviation 8.0) for PD, 28.6 (8.0) for RD and 36.0 (8.0) for TD. The mean percent relative erosion resistance change was -58.8 (12.7) for PD, -31.3 (12.7) for RD and -27.3 (12.6) for TD. Both fluoride-containing dentifrices provided superior remineralization (p <0.001) and erosion resistance (p <0.001) compared to PD. The percent surface microhardness recovery demonstrated by the TD was significantly greater than for the RD (p <0.001). There was no significant difference (p = 0.073) between TD and RD in relative resistance to further erosive challenge. The results suggest that fluoride availability may be different in dentifrices with similar sources/concentrations of fluoride, providing different levels of remineralization of eroded enamel.

KW - Dentifrice

KW - Erosion

KW - Remineralization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59549089594&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59549089594&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000201591

DO - 10.1159/000201591

M3 - Article

C2 - 19204389

AN - SCOPUS:59549089594

VL - 43

SP - 57

EP - 63

JO - Caries Research

JF - Caries Research

SN - 0008-6568

IS - 1

ER -