Informing patients about risks and benefits of radiology examinations

A review article

Jeremy S. Cardinal, Richard Gunderman, Robert D. Tarver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Communicating the risks, benefits, and alternatives to a planned medical intervention is integral to high-quality patient care. When effective, such communication promotes patient autonomy, alleviates unfounded patient apprehension, and mitigates medicolegal liability. The topic of medical radiation adds to the usual challenges of effective medical communication some special challenges of its own. Among these is a lack of understanding by the general population and health professionals of the benefits and risks of medical radiation, which is compounded by unfamiliar terminology and units of measure. This is further complicated by the fact that many patients have poor comprehension of risk data in general. In this article, the authors present a case, review the ethical basis and legal history of informed consent, and explore the current initiatives, available resources, and further opportunities related to this challenging topic.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)402-408
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume8
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Radiology
Ethical Review
Communication
Radiation
Quality of Health Care
Insurance Benefits
Informed Consent
Terminology
Patient Care
Population

Keywords

  • communication
  • Informed consent
  • medical radiation
  • radiology
  • risk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Informing patients about risks and benefits of radiology examinations : A review article. / Cardinal, Jeremy S.; Gunderman, Richard; Tarver, Robert D.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 8, No. 6, 2011, p. 402-408.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1bc8b11328104205b1eb4b0a6058f62e,
title = "Informing patients about risks and benefits of radiology examinations: A review article",
abstract = "Communicating the risks, benefits, and alternatives to a planned medical intervention is integral to high-quality patient care. When effective, such communication promotes patient autonomy, alleviates unfounded patient apprehension, and mitigates medicolegal liability. The topic of medical radiation adds to the usual challenges of effective medical communication some special challenges of its own. Among these is a lack of understanding by the general population and health professionals of the benefits and risks of medical radiation, which is compounded by unfamiliar terminology and units of measure. This is further complicated by the fact that many patients have poor comprehension of risk data in general. In this article, the authors present a case, review the ethical basis and legal history of informed consent, and explore the current initiatives, available resources, and further opportunities related to this challenging topic.",
keywords = "communication, Informed consent, medical radiation, radiology, risk",
author = "Cardinal, {Jeremy S.} and Richard Gunderman and Tarver, {Robert D.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2010.09.007",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "402--408",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Informing patients about risks and benefits of radiology examinations

T2 - A review article

AU - Cardinal, Jeremy S.

AU - Gunderman, Richard

AU - Tarver, Robert D.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Communicating the risks, benefits, and alternatives to a planned medical intervention is integral to high-quality patient care. When effective, such communication promotes patient autonomy, alleviates unfounded patient apprehension, and mitigates medicolegal liability. The topic of medical radiation adds to the usual challenges of effective medical communication some special challenges of its own. Among these is a lack of understanding by the general population and health professionals of the benefits and risks of medical radiation, which is compounded by unfamiliar terminology and units of measure. This is further complicated by the fact that many patients have poor comprehension of risk data in general. In this article, the authors present a case, review the ethical basis and legal history of informed consent, and explore the current initiatives, available resources, and further opportunities related to this challenging topic.

AB - Communicating the risks, benefits, and alternatives to a planned medical intervention is integral to high-quality patient care. When effective, such communication promotes patient autonomy, alleviates unfounded patient apprehension, and mitigates medicolegal liability. The topic of medical radiation adds to the usual challenges of effective medical communication some special challenges of its own. Among these is a lack of understanding by the general population and health professionals of the benefits and risks of medical radiation, which is compounded by unfamiliar terminology and units of measure. This is further complicated by the fact that many patients have poor comprehension of risk data in general. In this article, the authors present a case, review the ethical basis and legal history of informed consent, and explore the current initiatives, available resources, and further opportunities related to this challenging topic.

KW - communication

KW - Informed consent

KW - medical radiation

KW - radiology

KW - risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928096122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928096122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.09.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.09.007

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 402

EP - 408

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 6

ER -