Inhibition in the human heart

E. N. Prystowsky, D. P. Zipes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Subthreshold electrotonic depolarizations have been shown to exert inhibitory actions on impulse conduction and generation in isolated cardiac tissues. The authors performed this study to determine whether inhibition occurs in human myocardium, and to investigate the effects of time and voltage, as well as distance, on myocardial inhibition. Sixteen subjects were studied in the clinical electrophysiology laboratory by standard techniques. Atrial and ventricular pacing were performed with the use of a quadripolar catheter. The basic drive train (S1) and premature stimulus (S2) were introduced at the distal bipolar electrode pair through one current output generator and the subthreshold conditioning stimulus S(c)] was introduced before S2 at the distal or proximal bipolar pair through a separate current output generator. When S(c) was initiated at the distal electrodes 40 msec before S2, inhibition of S2 could always be demonstrated (atrium or ventricle). Since S(c) was introduced progressively earlier than S2, S(c) inhibited the response to S2 according to a curvilinear strength-interval relationship; increasing milliamperes of S(c) from less than 1.0 to 10.0 increased the interval at which S(c) preceded S2 and still inhibited S2. With currents of S(c) of 10.0 mA or less, S(c) inhibited S2 in the ventricle (n = 11) and atrium (n = 5) when S(c) preceded S2 by 40 to 160 msec (mean 85 msec) and 80 to 190 msec (mean 116 msec), respectively. Ventricular inhibition attempted with S(c) at the proximal bipolar pair and S2 at the distal pair was successful in three of nine patients. The effect of S(c) on ventricular excitability threshold of S2 was determined in three patients. For all three patients the current threshold of S2 varied directly as a function of the magnitude of current used for S(c). These data demonstrate that (1) subthreshold stimuli can prevent subsequent threshold stimuli from depolarizing human atrium and ventricle, (2) inhibition is both time and voltage dependent, and (3) inhibition is more effective if the inhibitory stimulus is applied close to the site of the threshold stimulus. Inhibition most likely occurs by S(c) electronically affecting the response of the tissue to S2, possibly in part by modifying myocardial excitability threshold, thereby preventing S2 from initiating an active response.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)707-713
Number of pages7
JournalCirculation
Volume68
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1983

Fingerprint

Electrodes
Electrophysiology
Myocardium
Catheters

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Prystowsky, E. N., & Zipes, D. P. (1983). Inhibition in the human heart. Circulation, 68(4), 707-713.

Inhibition in the human heart. / Prystowsky, E. N.; Zipes, D. P.

In: Circulation, Vol. 68, No. 4, 1983, p. 707-713.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Prystowsky, EN & Zipes, DP 1983, 'Inhibition in the human heart', Circulation, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 707-713.
Prystowsky EN, Zipes DP. Inhibition in the human heart. Circulation. 1983;68(4):707-713.
Prystowsky, E. N. ; Zipes, D. P. / Inhibition in the human heart. In: Circulation. 1983 ; Vol. 68, No. 4. pp. 707-713.
@article{4ed2b21810784ab487dbe3665ba95d87,
title = "Inhibition in the human heart",
abstract = "Subthreshold electrotonic depolarizations have been shown to exert inhibitory actions on impulse conduction and generation in isolated cardiac tissues. The authors performed this study to determine whether inhibition occurs in human myocardium, and to investigate the effects of time and voltage, as well as distance, on myocardial inhibition. Sixteen subjects were studied in the clinical electrophysiology laboratory by standard techniques. Atrial and ventricular pacing were performed with the use of a quadripolar catheter. The basic drive train (S1) and premature stimulus (S2) were introduced at the distal bipolar electrode pair through one current output generator and the subthreshold conditioning stimulus S(c)] was introduced before S2 at the distal or proximal bipolar pair through a separate current output generator. When S(c) was initiated at the distal electrodes 40 msec before S2, inhibition of S2 could always be demonstrated (atrium or ventricle). Since S(c) was introduced progressively earlier than S2, S(c) inhibited the response to S2 according to a curvilinear strength-interval relationship; increasing milliamperes of S(c) from less than 1.0 to 10.0 increased the interval at which S(c) preceded S2 and still inhibited S2. With currents of S(c) of 10.0 mA or less, S(c) inhibited S2 in the ventricle (n = 11) and atrium (n = 5) when S(c) preceded S2 by 40 to 160 msec (mean 85 msec) and 80 to 190 msec (mean 116 msec), respectively. Ventricular inhibition attempted with S(c) at the proximal bipolar pair and S2 at the distal pair was successful in three of nine patients. The effect of S(c) on ventricular excitability threshold of S2 was determined in three patients. For all three patients the current threshold of S2 varied directly as a function of the magnitude of current used for S(c). These data demonstrate that (1) subthreshold stimuli can prevent subsequent threshold stimuli from depolarizing human atrium and ventricle, (2) inhibition is both time and voltage dependent, and (3) inhibition is more effective if the inhibitory stimulus is applied close to the site of the threshold stimulus. Inhibition most likely occurs by S(c) electronically affecting the response of the tissue to S2, possibly in part by modifying myocardial excitability threshold, thereby preventing S2 from initiating an active response.",
author = "Prystowsky, {E. N.} and Zipes, {D. P.}",
year = "1983",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "707--713",
journal = "Circulation",
issn = "0009-7322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inhibition in the human heart

AU - Prystowsky, E. N.

AU - Zipes, D. P.

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - Subthreshold electrotonic depolarizations have been shown to exert inhibitory actions on impulse conduction and generation in isolated cardiac tissues. The authors performed this study to determine whether inhibition occurs in human myocardium, and to investigate the effects of time and voltage, as well as distance, on myocardial inhibition. Sixteen subjects were studied in the clinical electrophysiology laboratory by standard techniques. Atrial and ventricular pacing were performed with the use of a quadripolar catheter. The basic drive train (S1) and premature stimulus (S2) were introduced at the distal bipolar electrode pair through one current output generator and the subthreshold conditioning stimulus S(c)] was introduced before S2 at the distal or proximal bipolar pair through a separate current output generator. When S(c) was initiated at the distal electrodes 40 msec before S2, inhibition of S2 could always be demonstrated (atrium or ventricle). Since S(c) was introduced progressively earlier than S2, S(c) inhibited the response to S2 according to a curvilinear strength-interval relationship; increasing milliamperes of S(c) from less than 1.0 to 10.0 increased the interval at which S(c) preceded S2 and still inhibited S2. With currents of S(c) of 10.0 mA or less, S(c) inhibited S2 in the ventricle (n = 11) and atrium (n = 5) when S(c) preceded S2 by 40 to 160 msec (mean 85 msec) and 80 to 190 msec (mean 116 msec), respectively. Ventricular inhibition attempted with S(c) at the proximal bipolar pair and S2 at the distal pair was successful in three of nine patients. The effect of S(c) on ventricular excitability threshold of S2 was determined in three patients. For all three patients the current threshold of S2 varied directly as a function of the magnitude of current used for S(c). These data demonstrate that (1) subthreshold stimuli can prevent subsequent threshold stimuli from depolarizing human atrium and ventricle, (2) inhibition is both time and voltage dependent, and (3) inhibition is more effective if the inhibitory stimulus is applied close to the site of the threshold stimulus. Inhibition most likely occurs by S(c) electronically affecting the response of the tissue to S2, possibly in part by modifying myocardial excitability threshold, thereby preventing S2 from initiating an active response.

AB - Subthreshold electrotonic depolarizations have been shown to exert inhibitory actions on impulse conduction and generation in isolated cardiac tissues. The authors performed this study to determine whether inhibition occurs in human myocardium, and to investigate the effects of time and voltage, as well as distance, on myocardial inhibition. Sixteen subjects were studied in the clinical electrophysiology laboratory by standard techniques. Atrial and ventricular pacing were performed with the use of a quadripolar catheter. The basic drive train (S1) and premature stimulus (S2) were introduced at the distal bipolar electrode pair through one current output generator and the subthreshold conditioning stimulus S(c)] was introduced before S2 at the distal or proximal bipolar pair through a separate current output generator. When S(c) was initiated at the distal electrodes 40 msec before S2, inhibition of S2 could always be demonstrated (atrium or ventricle). Since S(c) was introduced progressively earlier than S2, S(c) inhibited the response to S2 according to a curvilinear strength-interval relationship; increasing milliamperes of S(c) from less than 1.0 to 10.0 increased the interval at which S(c) preceded S2 and still inhibited S2. With currents of S(c) of 10.0 mA or less, S(c) inhibited S2 in the ventricle (n = 11) and atrium (n = 5) when S(c) preceded S2 by 40 to 160 msec (mean 85 msec) and 80 to 190 msec (mean 116 msec), respectively. Ventricular inhibition attempted with S(c) at the proximal bipolar pair and S2 at the distal pair was successful in three of nine patients. The effect of S(c) on ventricular excitability threshold of S2 was determined in three patients. For all three patients the current threshold of S2 varied directly as a function of the magnitude of current used for S(c). These data demonstrate that (1) subthreshold stimuli can prevent subsequent threshold stimuli from depolarizing human atrium and ventricle, (2) inhibition is both time and voltage dependent, and (3) inhibition is more effective if the inhibitory stimulus is applied close to the site of the threshold stimulus. Inhibition most likely occurs by S(c) electronically affecting the response of the tissue to S2, possibly in part by modifying myocardial excitability threshold, thereby preventing S2 from initiating an active response.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020604416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020604416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6616770

AN - SCOPUS:0020604416

VL - 68

SP - 707

EP - 713

JO - Circulation

JF - Circulation

SN - 0009-7322

IS - 4

ER -