Inhibitory functioning across ADHD subtypes: Recent findings, clinical implications, and future directions

Zachary Adams, Karen J. Derefinko, Richard Milich, Mark T. Fillmore

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although growing consensus supports the role of deficient behavioral inhibition as a central feature of the combined subtype of ADHD (ADHD/C; Barkley [1997] Psychol Bull 121:65-94; Nigg [2001] Psychol Bull 127:571-598), little research has focused on how this finding generalizes to the primarily inattentive subtype (ADHD/I). This question holds particular relevance in light of recent work suggesting that ADHD/I might be better characterized as a disorder separate from ADHD/C (Diamond [2005] Dev Psychopathol 17:807-825; Milich et al. [2001] Clin Psychol Sci Pract 8:463-488). This article describes major findings in the area of inhibitory performance in ADHD and highlights recent research suggesting important areas of divergence between the subtypes. In particular, preliminary findings point to potential differences between the subtypes with respect to how children process important contextual information from the environment, such as preparatory cues that precede responses and rewarding or punishing feedback following behavior. These suggestive findings are discussed in the context of treatment implications, which could involve differential intervention approaches for each subtype targeted to the specific deficit profiles that characterize each group of children. Future research avenues aimed toward building a sound theoretical model of ADHD/I and a better understanding of its relation to ADHD/C are also presented. Specifically, investigators are encouraged to continue studying the complex interplay between inhibitory and attentional processes, as this area seems particularly promising in its ability to improve our understanding of the potentially distinct pathologies underlying the ADHD subtypes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)268-275
Number of pages8
JournalDevelopmental Disabilities Research Reviews
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Diamond
Aptitude
Research
Cues
Consensus
Theoretical Models
Research Personnel
Pathology
Direction compound
Therapeutics
Inhibition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • ADHD
  • Contextual factors
  • Inhibition
  • Subtypes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Inhibitory functioning across ADHD subtypes : Recent findings, clinical implications, and future directions. / Adams, Zachary; Derefinko, Karen J.; Milich, Richard; Fillmore, Mark T.

In: Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2008, p. 268-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{0b25cd0440b44b2aa217c8bc784ac201,
title = "Inhibitory functioning across ADHD subtypes: Recent findings, clinical implications, and future directions",
abstract = "Although growing consensus supports the role of deficient behavioral inhibition as a central feature of the combined subtype of ADHD (ADHD/C; Barkley [1997] Psychol Bull 121:65-94; Nigg [2001] Psychol Bull 127:571-598), little research has focused on how this finding generalizes to the primarily inattentive subtype (ADHD/I). This question holds particular relevance in light of recent work suggesting that ADHD/I might be better characterized as a disorder separate from ADHD/C (Diamond [2005] Dev Psychopathol 17:807-825; Milich et al. [2001] Clin Psychol Sci Pract 8:463-488). This article describes major findings in the area of inhibitory performance in ADHD and highlights recent research suggesting important areas of divergence between the subtypes. In particular, preliminary findings point to potential differences between the subtypes with respect to how children process important contextual information from the environment, such as preparatory cues that precede responses and rewarding or punishing feedback following behavior. These suggestive findings are discussed in the context of treatment implications, which could involve differential intervention approaches for each subtype targeted to the specific deficit profiles that characterize each group of children. Future research avenues aimed toward building a sound theoretical model of ADHD/I and a better understanding of its relation to ADHD/C are also presented. Specifically, investigators are encouraged to continue studying the complex interplay between inhibitory and attentional processes, as this area seems particularly promising in its ability to improve our understanding of the potentially distinct pathologies underlying the ADHD subtypes.",
keywords = "ADHD, Contextual factors, Inhibition, Subtypes",
author = "Zachary Adams and Derefinko, {Karen J.} and Richard Milich and Fillmore, {Mark T.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1002/ddrr.37",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "268--275",
journal = "Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews",
issn = "1940-5510",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inhibitory functioning across ADHD subtypes

T2 - Recent findings, clinical implications, and future directions

AU - Adams, Zachary

AU - Derefinko, Karen J.

AU - Milich, Richard

AU - Fillmore, Mark T.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Although growing consensus supports the role of deficient behavioral inhibition as a central feature of the combined subtype of ADHD (ADHD/C; Barkley [1997] Psychol Bull 121:65-94; Nigg [2001] Psychol Bull 127:571-598), little research has focused on how this finding generalizes to the primarily inattentive subtype (ADHD/I). This question holds particular relevance in light of recent work suggesting that ADHD/I might be better characterized as a disorder separate from ADHD/C (Diamond [2005] Dev Psychopathol 17:807-825; Milich et al. [2001] Clin Psychol Sci Pract 8:463-488). This article describes major findings in the area of inhibitory performance in ADHD and highlights recent research suggesting important areas of divergence between the subtypes. In particular, preliminary findings point to potential differences between the subtypes with respect to how children process important contextual information from the environment, such as preparatory cues that precede responses and rewarding or punishing feedback following behavior. These suggestive findings are discussed in the context of treatment implications, which could involve differential intervention approaches for each subtype targeted to the specific deficit profiles that characterize each group of children. Future research avenues aimed toward building a sound theoretical model of ADHD/I and a better understanding of its relation to ADHD/C are also presented. Specifically, investigators are encouraged to continue studying the complex interplay between inhibitory and attentional processes, as this area seems particularly promising in its ability to improve our understanding of the potentially distinct pathologies underlying the ADHD subtypes.

AB - Although growing consensus supports the role of deficient behavioral inhibition as a central feature of the combined subtype of ADHD (ADHD/C; Barkley [1997] Psychol Bull 121:65-94; Nigg [2001] Psychol Bull 127:571-598), little research has focused on how this finding generalizes to the primarily inattentive subtype (ADHD/I). This question holds particular relevance in light of recent work suggesting that ADHD/I might be better characterized as a disorder separate from ADHD/C (Diamond [2005] Dev Psychopathol 17:807-825; Milich et al. [2001] Clin Psychol Sci Pract 8:463-488). This article describes major findings in the area of inhibitory performance in ADHD and highlights recent research suggesting important areas of divergence between the subtypes. In particular, preliminary findings point to potential differences between the subtypes with respect to how children process important contextual information from the environment, such as preparatory cues that precede responses and rewarding or punishing feedback following behavior. These suggestive findings are discussed in the context of treatment implications, which could involve differential intervention approaches for each subtype targeted to the specific deficit profiles that characterize each group of children. Future research avenues aimed toward building a sound theoretical model of ADHD/I and a better understanding of its relation to ADHD/C are also presented. Specifically, investigators are encouraged to continue studying the complex interplay between inhibitory and attentional processes, as this area seems particularly promising in its ability to improve our understanding of the potentially distinct pathologies underlying the ADHD subtypes.

KW - ADHD

KW - Contextual factors

KW - Inhibition

KW - Subtypes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149145738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149145738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ddrr.37

DO - 10.1002/ddrr.37

M3 - Review article

C2 - 19072751

AN - SCOPUS:58149145738

VL - 14

SP - 268

EP - 275

JO - Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews

JF - Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews

SN - 1940-5510

IS - 4

ER -