Initial experience with an active-fixation defibrillation electrode and the presence of nonphysiological sensing

Rahul N. Doshi, Jeffrey Goodman, Ajay M. Naik, Kalyanam Shivkumar, Peng-Sheng Chen, C. Thomas Peter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nonphysiological sensing by a pacing and defibrillation electrode may result in inappropriate defibrillator discharges and/or inhibition of pacing. Active-fixation electrodes may be more likely to sense diaphragmatic myopotentials because of the protrusion of the screw for fixation. In addition, the movement of the fixation screw in an integrated bipolar lead system could also result in inappropriate sensing. This may be increasingly important in patients who are pacemaker dependent because the dynamic range of the autogain feature of these devices is much more narrow. Five of 15 consecutive patients who received a CPI model 0154 or 0155 active-fixation defibrillation electrode with an ICD system (CPI Ventak A V3DR model 1831 or CPI Ventak VR model 1774 defibrillator) are described. In 2 of the 15 patients, nonphysiological sensing appearing to be diaphragmatic myopotentials resulted in inappropriate defibrillator discharges. Both patients were pacemaker dependent. Changes in the sensitivity from nominal to less sensitive prevented inappropriate discharges. In one patient, discreet nonphysiological sensed events with the electrogram suggestive of ventricular activation was noted at the time of implantation. This was completely eliminated by redeployment of the active-fixation lead in the inter-ventricular septum. In two other patients, discreet nonphysiological sensed events resulted in intermittent inhibition of ventricular pacing after implantation. These were still seen in the least sensitive autogain mode for ventricular amplitude. These were not seen on subsequent interrogation 1 month after implantation. Increased awareness of nonphysiological sensing is recommended. The CPI 0154 and 0155 leads seem to be particularly prone to this abnormality. Particular attention should be made when deploying an active-fixation screw for an integrated bipolar lead. This increased awareness is more important when a given individual is pacemaker dependent, which may warrant DFT testing in a least or less sensitive mode in these patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1713-1720
Number of pages8
JournalPACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume24
Issue number12
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electrodes
Defibrillators
Ventricular Septum
Equipment and Supplies
cyclopropapyrroloindole
Lead

Keywords

  • Active fixation
  • Artifact
  • Implantable cardioverter defibrillator
  • Myopotentials
  • Oversensing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Initial experience with an active-fixation defibrillation electrode and the presence of nonphysiological sensing. / Doshi, Rahul N.; Goodman, Jeffrey; Naik, Ajay M.; Shivkumar, Kalyanam; Chen, Peng-Sheng; Peter, C. Thomas.

In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Vol. 24, No. 12, 2001, p. 1713-1720.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Doshi, Rahul N. ; Goodman, Jeffrey ; Naik, Ajay M. ; Shivkumar, Kalyanam ; Chen, Peng-Sheng ; Peter, C. Thomas. / Initial experience with an active-fixation defibrillation electrode and the presence of nonphysiological sensing. In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 2001 ; Vol. 24, No. 12. pp. 1713-1720.
@article{07fa5a7193eb44a2907f7bb96e82ca26,
title = "Initial experience with an active-fixation defibrillation electrode and the presence of nonphysiological sensing",
abstract = "Nonphysiological sensing by a pacing and defibrillation electrode may result in inappropriate defibrillator discharges and/or inhibition of pacing. Active-fixation electrodes may be more likely to sense diaphragmatic myopotentials because of the protrusion of the screw for fixation. In addition, the movement of the fixation screw in an integrated bipolar lead system could also result in inappropriate sensing. This may be increasingly important in patients who are pacemaker dependent because the dynamic range of the autogain feature of these devices is much more narrow. Five of 15 consecutive patients who received a CPI model 0154 or 0155 active-fixation defibrillation electrode with an ICD system (CPI Ventak A V3DR model 1831 or CPI Ventak VR model 1774 defibrillator) are described. In 2 of the 15 patients, nonphysiological sensing appearing to be diaphragmatic myopotentials resulted in inappropriate defibrillator discharges. Both patients were pacemaker dependent. Changes in the sensitivity from nominal to less sensitive prevented inappropriate discharges. In one patient, discreet nonphysiological sensed events with the electrogram suggestive of ventricular activation was noted at the time of implantation. This was completely eliminated by redeployment of the active-fixation lead in the inter-ventricular septum. In two other patients, discreet nonphysiological sensed events resulted in intermittent inhibition of ventricular pacing after implantation. These were still seen in the least sensitive autogain mode for ventricular amplitude. These were not seen on subsequent interrogation 1 month after implantation. Increased awareness of nonphysiological sensing is recommended. The CPI 0154 and 0155 leads seem to be particularly prone to this abnormality. Particular attention should be made when deploying an active-fixation screw for an integrated bipolar lead. This increased awareness is more important when a given individual is pacemaker dependent, which may warrant DFT testing in a least or less sensitive mode in these patients.",
keywords = "Active fixation, Artifact, Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, Myopotentials, Oversensing",
author = "Doshi, {Rahul N.} and Jeffrey Goodman and Naik, {Ajay M.} and Kalyanam Shivkumar and Peng-Sheng Chen and Peter, {C. Thomas}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "1713--1720",
journal = "PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology",
issn = "0147-8389",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Initial experience with an active-fixation defibrillation electrode and the presence of nonphysiological sensing

AU - Doshi, Rahul N.

AU - Goodman, Jeffrey

AU - Naik, Ajay M.

AU - Shivkumar, Kalyanam

AU - Chen, Peng-Sheng

AU - Peter, C. Thomas

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Nonphysiological sensing by a pacing and defibrillation electrode may result in inappropriate defibrillator discharges and/or inhibition of pacing. Active-fixation electrodes may be more likely to sense diaphragmatic myopotentials because of the protrusion of the screw for fixation. In addition, the movement of the fixation screw in an integrated bipolar lead system could also result in inappropriate sensing. This may be increasingly important in patients who are pacemaker dependent because the dynamic range of the autogain feature of these devices is much more narrow. Five of 15 consecutive patients who received a CPI model 0154 or 0155 active-fixation defibrillation electrode with an ICD system (CPI Ventak A V3DR model 1831 or CPI Ventak VR model 1774 defibrillator) are described. In 2 of the 15 patients, nonphysiological sensing appearing to be diaphragmatic myopotentials resulted in inappropriate defibrillator discharges. Both patients were pacemaker dependent. Changes in the sensitivity from nominal to less sensitive prevented inappropriate discharges. In one patient, discreet nonphysiological sensed events with the electrogram suggestive of ventricular activation was noted at the time of implantation. This was completely eliminated by redeployment of the active-fixation lead in the inter-ventricular septum. In two other patients, discreet nonphysiological sensed events resulted in intermittent inhibition of ventricular pacing after implantation. These were still seen in the least sensitive autogain mode for ventricular amplitude. These were not seen on subsequent interrogation 1 month after implantation. Increased awareness of nonphysiological sensing is recommended. The CPI 0154 and 0155 leads seem to be particularly prone to this abnormality. Particular attention should be made when deploying an active-fixation screw for an integrated bipolar lead. This increased awareness is more important when a given individual is pacemaker dependent, which may warrant DFT testing in a least or less sensitive mode in these patients.

AB - Nonphysiological sensing by a pacing and defibrillation electrode may result in inappropriate defibrillator discharges and/or inhibition of pacing. Active-fixation electrodes may be more likely to sense diaphragmatic myopotentials because of the protrusion of the screw for fixation. In addition, the movement of the fixation screw in an integrated bipolar lead system could also result in inappropriate sensing. This may be increasingly important in patients who are pacemaker dependent because the dynamic range of the autogain feature of these devices is much more narrow. Five of 15 consecutive patients who received a CPI model 0154 or 0155 active-fixation defibrillation electrode with an ICD system (CPI Ventak A V3DR model 1831 or CPI Ventak VR model 1774 defibrillator) are described. In 2 of the 15 patients, nonphysiological sensing appearing to be diaphragmatic myopotentials resulted in inappropriate defibrillator discharges. Both patients were pacemaker dependent. Changes in the sensitivity from nominal to less sensitive prevented inappropriate discharges. In one patient, discreet nonphysiological sensed events with the electrogram suggestive of ventricular activation was noted at the time of implantation. This was completely eliminated by redeployment of the active-fixation lead in the inter-ventricular septum. In two other patients, discreet nonphysiological sensed events resulted in intermittent inhibition of ventricular pacing after implantation. These were still seen in the least sensitive autogain mode for ventricular amplitude. These were not seen on subsequent interrogation 1 month after implantation. Increased awareness of nonphysiological sensing is recommended. The CPI 0154 and 0155 leads seem to be particularly prone to this abnormality. Particular attention should be made when deploying an active-fixation screw for an integrated bipolar lead. This increased awareness is more important when a given individual is pacemaker dependent, which may warrant DFT testing in a least or less sensitive mode in these patients.

KW - Active fixation

KW - Artifact

KW - Implantable cardioverter defibrillator

KW - Myopotentials

KW - Oversensing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035693996&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035693996&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 1713

EP - 1720

JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

SN - 0147-8389

IS - 12

ER -