Institutional and economic determinants of public health system performance

Glen P. Mays, Megan C. McHugh, Kyumin Shim, Natalie Perry, Dennis Lenaway, Paul Halverson, Ramal Moonesinghe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

117 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. Although a growing body of evidence demonstrates that availability and quality of essential public health services vary widely across communities, relatively little is known about the factors that give rise to these variations. We examined the association of institutional, financial, and community characteristics of local public health delivery systems and the performance of essential services. Methods. Performance measures were collected from local public health systems in 7 states and combined with secondary data sources. Multivariate, linear, and nonlinear regression models were used to estimate associations between system characteristics and the performance of essential services. Results. Performance varied significantly with the size, financial resources, and organizational structure of local public health systems, with some public health services appearing more sensitive to these characteristics than others. Staffing levels and community characteristics also appeared to be related to the performance of selected services. Conclusions. Reconfiguring the organization and financing of public health systems in some communities-such as through consolidation and enhanced intergovernmental coordination-may hold promise for improving the performance of essential services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)523-531
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume96
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Public Health
Economics
United States Public Health Service
Nonlinear Dynamics
Information Storage and Retrieval
Linear Models
Organizations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Institutional and economic determinants of public health system performance. / Mays, Glen P.; McHugh, Megan C.; Shim, Kyumin; Perry, Natalie; Lenaway, Dennis; Halverson, Paul; Moonesinghe, Ramal.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 96, No. 3, 01.03.2006, p. 523-531.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mays, GP, McHugh, MC, Shim, K, Perry, N, Lenaway, D, Halverson, P & Moonesinghe, R 2006, 'Institutional and economic determinants of public health system performance', American Journal of Public Health, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 523-531. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.064253
Mays, Glen P. ; McHugh, Megan C. ; Shim, Kyumin ; Perry, Natalie ; Lenaway, Dennis ; Halverson, Paul ; Moonesinghe, Ramal. / Institutional and economic determinants of public health system performance. In: American Journal of Public Health. 2006 ; Vol. 96, No. 3. pp. 523-531.
@article{69083a5313e945688659347d843d7ff6,
title = "Institutional and economic determinants of public health system performance",
abstract = "Objectives. Although a growing body of evidence demonstrates that availability and quality of essential public health services vary widely across communities, relatively little is known about the factors that give rise to these variations. We examined the association of institutional, financial, and community characteristics of local public health delivery systems and the performance of essential services. Methods. Performance measures were collected from local public health systems in 7 states and combined with secondary data sources. Multivariate, linear, and nonlinear regression models were used to estimate associations between system characteristics and the performance of essential services. Results. Performance varied significantly with the size, financial resources, and organizational structure of local public health systems, with some public health services appearing more sensitive to these characteristics than others. Staffing levels and community characteristics also appeared to be related to the performance of selected services. Conclusions. Reconfiguring the organization and financing of public health systems in some communities-such as through consolidation and enhanced intergovernmental coordination-may hold promise for improving the performance of essential services.",
author = "Mays, {Glen P.} and McHugh, {Megan C.} and Kyumin Shim and Natalie Perry and Dennis Lenaway and Paul Halverson and Ramal Moonesinghe",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2005.064253",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "523--531",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Institutional and economic determinants of public health system performance

AU - Mays, Glen P.

AU - McHugh, Megan C.

AU - Shim, Kyumin

AU - Perry, Natalie

AU - Lenaway, Dennis

AU - Halverson, Paul

AU - Moonesinghe, Ramal

PY - 2006/3/1

Y1 - 2006/3/1

N2 - Objectives. Although a growing body of evidence demonstrates that availability and quality of essential public health services vary widely across communities, relatively little is known about the factors that give rise to these variations. We examined the association of institutional, financial, and community characteristics of local public health delivery systems and the performance of essential services. Methods. Performance measures were collected from local public health systems in 7 states and combined with secondary data sources. Multivariate, linear, and nonlinear regression models were used to estimate associations between system characteristics and the performance of essential services. Results. Performance varied significantly with the size, financial resources, and organizational structure of local public health systems, with some public health services appearing more sensitive to these characteristics than others. Staffing levels and community characteristics also appeared to be related to the performance of selected services. Conclusions. Reconfiguring the organization and financing of public health systems in some communities-such as through consolidation and enhanced intergovernmental coordination-may hold promise for improving the performance of essential services.

AB - Objectives. Although a growing body of evidence demonstrates that availability and quality of essential public health services vary widely across communities, relatively little is known about the factors that give rise to these variations. We examined the association of institutional, financial, and community characteristics of local public health delivery systems and the performance of essential services. Methods. Performance measures were collected from local public health systems in 7 states and combined with secondary data sources. Multivariate, linear, and nonlinear regression models were used to estimate associations between system characteristics and the performance of essential services. Results. Performance varied significantly with the size, financial resources, and organizational structure of local public health systems, with some public health services appearing more sensitive to these characteristics than others. Staffing levels and community characteristics also appeared to be related to the performance of selected services. Conclusions. Reconfiguring the organization and financing of public health systems in some communities-such as through consolidation and enhanced intergovernmental coordination-may hold promise for improving the performance of essential services.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644635424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644635424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2005.064253

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2005.064253

M3 - Article

VL - 96

SP - 523

EP - 531

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 3

ER -