Institutional Variation in Traumatic Brain Injury Acute Rehabilitation Practice

Ronald T. Seel, Ryan S. Barrett, Cynthia L. Beaulieu, David K. Ryser, Flora Hammond, Nora Cullen, William Garmoe, Teri Sommerfeld, John D. Corrigan, Susan D. Horn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe institutional variation in traumatic brain injury (TBI) inpatient rehabilitation program characteristics and evaluate to what extent patient factors and center effects explain how TBI inpatient rehabilitation services are delivered.

DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter, cohort database.

SETTING: TBI inpatient rehabilitation programs.

PARTICIPANTS: Patients with complicated mild, moderate, or severe TBI (N=2130).

INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean minutes; number of treatment activities; use of groups in occupational therapy, physical therapy, speech therapy, therapeutic recreation, and psychology inpatient rehabilitation sessions; and weekly hours of treatment.

RESULTS: A wide variation was observed between the 10 TBI programs, including census size, referral flow, payer mix, number of dedicated beds, clinician experience, and patient characteristics. At the centers with the longest weekday therapy sessions, the average session durations were 41.5 to 52.2 minutes. At centers with the shortest weekday sessions, the average session durations were approximately 30 minutes. The centers with the highest mean total weekday hours of occupational, physical, and speech therapies delivered twice as much therapy as the lowest center. Ordinary least-squares regression modeling found that center effects explained substantially more variance than patient factors for duration of therapy sessions, number of activities administered per session, use of group therapy, and amount of psychological services provided.

CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary evidence that there is significant institutional variation in rehabilitation practice and that center effects play a stronger role than patient factors in determining how TBI inpatient rehabilitation is delivered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S197-S208
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume96
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Keywords

  • Brain injuries
  • Craniocerebral trauma
  • Health services
  • Health services research
  • Occupational therapy
  • Physical therapy specialty
  • Psychology
  • Recreation therapy
  • Rehabilitation
  • Speech therapy
  • Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Institutional Variation in Traumatic Brain Injury Acute Rehabilitation Practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Seel, R. T., Barrett, R. S., Beaulieu, C. L., Ryser, D. K., Hammond, F., Cullen, N., Garmoe, W., Sommerfeld, T., Corrigan, J. D., & Horn, S. D. (2015). Institutional Variation in Traumatic Brain Injury Acute Rehabilitation Practice. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(8), S197-S208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.02.034