International society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. working group 4: Seminal vesicles and lymph nodes

Daniel M. Berney, Thomas M. Wheeler, David Grignon, Jonathan I. Epstein, David F. Griffiths, Peter A. Humphrey, Theo Van Der Kwast, Rodolfo Montironi, Brett Delahunt, Lars Egevad, John R. Srigley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

106 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference in Boston made recommendations regarding the standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Issues relating to the infiltration of tumor into the seminal vesicles and regional lymph nodes were coordinated by working group 4. There was a consensus that complete blocking of the seminal vesicles was not necessary, although sampling of the junction of the seminal vesicles and prostate was mandatory. There was consensus that sampling of the vas deferens margins was not obligatory. There was also consensus that muscular wall invasion of the extraprostatic seminal vesicle only should be regarded as seminal vesicle invasion. Categorization into types of seminal vesicle spread was agreed by consensus to be not necessary. For examination of lymph nodes, there was consensus that special techniques such as frozen sectioning were of use only in high-risk cases. There was no consensus on the optimal sampling method for pelvic lymph node dissection specimens, although there was consensus that all lymph nodes should be completely blocked as a minimum. There was also a consensus that a count of the number of lymph nodes harvested should be attempted. In view of recent evidence, there was consensus that the diameter of the largest lymph node metastasis should be measured. These consensus decisions will hopefully clarify the difficult areas of pathological assessment in radical prostatectomy evaluation and improve the concordance of research series to allow more accurate assessment of patient prognosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-47
Number of pages9
JournalModern Pathology
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Seminal Vesicles
Prostatectomy
Lymph Nodes
Pathology
Vas Deferens
Lymph Node Excision
Prostate
Neoplasm Metastasis
Research
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • lymph node
  • prostate adenocarcinoma
  • radical prostatectomy
  • seminal vesicle
  • tumor staging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

International society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. working group 4 : Seminal vesicles and lymph nodes. / Berney, Daniel M.; Wheeler, Thomas M.; Grignon, David; Epstein, Jonathan I.; Griffiths, David F.; Humphrey, Peter A.; Van Der Kwast, Theo; Montironi, Rodolfo; Delahunt, Brett; Egevad, Lars; Srigley, John R.

In: Modern Pathology, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 39-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Berney, DM, Wheeler, TM, Grignon, D, Epstein, JI, Griffiths, DF, Humphrey, PA, Van Der Kwast, T, Montironi, R, Delahunt, B, Egevad, L & Srigley, JR 2011, 'International society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. working group 4: Seminal vesicles and lymph nodes', Modern Pathology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2010.160
Berney, Daniel M. ; Wheeler, Thomas M. ; Grignon, David ; Epstein, Jonathan I. ; Griffiths, David F. ; Humphrey, Peter A. ; Van Der Kwast, Theo ; Montironi, Rodolfo ; Delahunt, Brett ; Egevad, Lars ; Srigley, John R. / International society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. working group 4 : Seminal vesicles and lymph nodes. In: Modern Pathology. 2011 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 39-47.
@article{2a74e3faa0174ef6a470a66ad2ce5207,
title = "International society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. working group 4: Seminal vesicles and lymph nodes",
abstract = "The 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference in Boston made recommendations regarding the standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Issues relating to the infiltration of tumor into the seminal vesicles and regional lymph nodes were coordinated by working group 4. There was a consensus that complete blocking of the seminal vesicles was not necessary, although sampling of the junction of the seminal vesicles and prostate was mandatory. There was consensus that sampling of the vas deferens margins was not obligatory. There was also consensus that muscular wall invasion of the extraprostatic seminal vesicle only should be regarded as seminal vesicle invasion. Categorization into types of seminal vesicle spread was agreed by consensus to be not necessary. For examination of lymph nodes, there was consensus that special techniques such as frozen sectioning were of use only in high-risk cases. There was no consensus on the optimal sampling method for pelvic lymph node dissection specimens, although there was consensus that all lymph nodes should be completely blocked as a minimum. There was also a consensus that a count of the number of lymph nodes harvested should be attempted. In view of recent evidence, there was consensus that the diameter of the largest lymph node metastasis should be measured. These consensus decisions will hopefully clarify the difficult areas of pathological assessment in radical prostatectomy evaluation and improve the concordance of research series to allow more accurate assessment of patient prognosis.",
keywords = "lymph node, prostate adenocarcinoma, radical prostatectomy, seminal vesicle, tumor staging",
author = "Berney, {Daniel M.} and Wheeler, {Thomas M.} and David Grignon and Epstein, {Jonathan I.} and Griffiths, {David F.} and Humphrey, {Peter A.} and {Van Der Kwast}, Theo and Rodolfo Montironi and Brett Delahunt and Lars Egevad and Srigley, {John R.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1038/modpathol.2010.160",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "39--47",
journal = "Modern Pathology",
issn = "0893-3952",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - International society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. working group 4

T2 - Seminal vesicles and lymph nodes

AU - Berney, Daniel M.

AU - Wheeler, Thomas M.

AU - Grignon, David

AU - Epstein, Jonathan I.

AU - Griffiths, David F.

AU - Humphrey, Peter A.

AU - Van Der Kwast, Theo

AU - Montironi, Rodolfo

AU - Delahunt, Brett

AU - Egevad, Lars

AU - Srigley, John R.

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - The 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference in Boston made recommendations regarding the standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Issues relating to the infiltration of tumor into the seminal vesicles and regional lymph nodes were coordinated by working group 4. There was a consensus that complete blocking of the seminal vesicles was not necessary, although sampling of the junction of the seminal vesicles and prostate was mandatory. There was consensus that sampling of the vas deferens margins was not obligatory. There was also consensus that muscular wall invasion of the extraprostatic seminal vesicle only should be regarded as seminal vesicle invasion. Categorization into types of seminal vesicle spread was agreed by consensus to be not necessary. For examination of lymph nodes, there was consensus that special techniques such as frozen sectioning were of use only in high-risk cases. There was no consensus on the optimal sampling method for pelvic lymph node dissection specimens, although there was consensus that all lymph nodes should be completely blocked as a minimum. There was also a consensus that a count of the number of lymph nodes harvested should be attempted. In view of recent evidence, there was consensus that the diameter of the largest lymph node metastasis should be measured. These consensus decisions will hopefully clarify the difficult areas of pathological assessment in radical prostatectomy evaluation and improve the concordance of research series to allow more accurate assessment of patient prognosis.

AB - The 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference in Boston made recommendations regarding the standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Issues relating to the infiltration of tumor into the seminal vesicles and regional lymph nodes were coordinated by working group 4. There was a consensus that complete blocking of the seminal vesicles was not necessary, although sampling of the junction of the seminal vesicles and prostate was mandatory. There was consensus that sampling of the vas deferens margins was not obligatory. There was also consensus that muscular wall invasion of the extraprostatic seminal vesicle only should be regarded as seminal vesicle invasion. Categorization into types of seminal vesicle spread was agreed by consensus to be not necessary. For examination of lymph nodes, there was consensus that special techniques such as frozen sectioning were of use only in high-risk cases. There was no consensus on the optimal sampling method for pelvic lymph node dissection specimens, although there was consensus that all lymph nodes should be completely blocked as a minimum. There was also a consensus that a count of the number of lymph nodes harvested should be attempted. In view of recent evidence, there was consensus that the diameter of the largest lymph node metastasis should be measured. These consensus decisions will hopefully clarify the difficult areas of pathological assessment in radical prostatectomy evaluation and improve the concordance of research series to allow more accurate assessment of patient prognosis.

KW - lymph node

KW - prostate adenocarcinoma

KW - radical prostatectomy

KW - seminal vesicle

KW - tumor staging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650889813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650889813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/modpathol.2010.160

DO - 10.1038/modpathol.2010.160

M3 - Article

C2 - 20818343

AN - SCOPUS:78650889813

VL - 24

SP - 39

EP - 47

JO - Modern Pathology

JF - Modern Pathology

SN - 0893-3952

IS - 1

ER -