Intestinal Graft Failure: Should We Perform the Allograft Enterectomy Before or With Retransplantation?

Shunji Nagai, Richard Mangus, Eve Anderson, Burcin Ekser, Chandrashekhar A. Kubal, Jonathan A. Fridell, A. J. Tector

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intestinal graft dysfunction is sometimes irreversible and requires allograft enterectomy with or without retransplantation. There is no comprehensive assessment of allograft enterectomy regarding indications and outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate management of patients with intestinal graft failure with special reference to indications and outcomes of allograft enterectomy and the procedureʼs validity as a bridge to retransplantation. METHODS: Graft and patient survivals, reason for graft failure, and rejection episodes were evaluated in 221 intestinal recipients (primary transplantation [n = 201], retransplantation [n = 20]). Indications, surgical factors, and outcomes of allograft enterectomy were investigated. RESULTS: Reasons for isolated enterectomy included systemic infection in 11, gastrointestinal bleeding in 1, and severe electrolyte imbalance in 1, all of which were associated with rejection. One isolated intestinal transplantation patient underwent isolated enterectomy due to cytomegalovirus enteritis. One multivisceral transplantation patient underwent isolated allograft enterectomy due to bowel necrosis. Of these 15 patients, 3 died from persistent infection postoperatively, whereas 8 underwent retransplantation with median interval of 74 days (42-252 days). Allosensitization occurred between isolated enterectomy and retransplantation in 2, one of whom lost the second graft due to rejection. Simultaneous allograft enterectomy and retransplantation was performed in 3 isolated intestinal transplantation and 9 multivisceral transplantation patients. Patient survival after retransplantation was similar between patients who underwent isolated allograft enterectomy and those who did simultaneous enterectomy with retransplantation (P = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: In cases of irreversible intestinal graft dysfunction, isolated allograft enterectomy successfully provides recovery from comorbidities as a lifesaving procedure and does not compromise outcomes of retransplantation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalTransplantation
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Feb 19 2016

Fingerprint

Allografts
Transplants
Transplantation
Enteritis
Graft Rejection
Graft Survival
Infection
Cytomegalovirus
Electrolytes
Comorbidity
Necrosis
Hemorrhage
Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Cite this

Intestinal Graft Failure : Should We Perform the Allograft Enterectomy Before or With Retransplantation? / Nagai, Shunji; Mangus, Richard; Anderson, Eve; Ekser, Burcin; Kubal, Chandrashekhar A.; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Tector, A. J.

In: Transplantation, 19.02.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nagai, Shunji ; Mangus, Richard ; Anderson, Eve ; Ekser, Burcin ; Kubal, Chandrashekhar A. ; Fridell, Jonathan A. ; Tector, A. J. / Intestinal Graft Failure : Should We Perform the Allograft Enterectomy Before or With Retransplantation?. In: Transplantation. 2016.
@article{71d98738154c4a8e9a00e94b2dd5e664,
title = "Intestinal Graft Failure: Should We Perform the Allograft Enterectomy Before or With Retransplantation?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Intestinal graft dysfunction is sometimes irreversible and requires allograft enterectomy with or without retransplantation. There is no comprehensive assessment of allograft enterectomy regarding indications and outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate management of patients with intestinal graft failure with special reference to indications and outcomes of allograft enterectomy and the procedureʼs validity as a bridge to retransplantation. METHODS: Graft and patient survivals, reason for graft failure, and rejection episodes were evaluated in 221 intestinal recipients (primary transplantation [n = 201], retransplantation [n = 20]). Indications, surgical factors, and outcomes of allograft enterectomy were investigated. RESULTS: Reasons for isolated enterectomy included systemic infection in 11, gastrointestinal bleeding in 1, and severe electrolyte imbalance in 1, all of which were associated with rejection. One isolated intestinal transplantation patient underwent isolated enterectomy due to cytomegalovirus enteritis. One multivisceral transplantation patient underwent isolated allograft enterectomy due to bowel necrosis. Of these 15 patients, 3 died from persistent infection postoperatively, whereas 8 underwent retransplantation with median interval of 74 days (42-252 days). Allosensitization occurred between isolated enterectomy and retransplantation in 2, one of whom lost the second graft due to rejection. Simultaneous allograft enterectomy and retransplantation was performed in 3 isolated intestinal transplantation and 9 multivisceral transplantation patients. Patient survival after retransplantation was similar between patients who underwent isolated allograft enterectomy and those who did simultaneous enterectomy with retransplantation (P = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: In cases of irreversible intestinal graft dysfunction, isolated allograft enterectomy successfully provides recovery from comorbidities as a lifesaving procedure and does not compromise outcomes of retransplantation.",
author = "Shunji Nagai and Richard Mangus and Eve Anderson and Burcin Ekser and Kubal, {Chandrashekhar A.} and Fridell, {Jonathan A.} and Tector, {A. J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1097/TP.0000000000001102",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Transplantation",
issn = "0041-1337",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intestinal Graft Failure

T2 - Should We Perform the Allograft Enterectomy Before or With Retransplantation?

AU - Nagai, Shunji

AU - Mangus, Richard

AU - Anderson, Eve

AU - Ekser, Burcin

AU - Kubal, Chandrashekhar A.

AU - Fridell, Jonathan A.

AU - Tector, A. J.

PY - 2016/2/19

Y1 - 2016/2/19

N2 - BACKGROUND: Intestinal graft dysfunction is sometimes irreversible and requires allograft enterectomy with or without retransplantation. There is no comprehensive assessment of allograft enterectomy regarding indications and outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate management of patients with intestinal graft failure with special reference to indications and outcomes of allograft enterectomy and the procedureʼs validity as a bridge to retransplantation. METHODS: Graft and patient survivals, reason for graft failure, and rejection episodes were evaluated in 221 intestinal recipients (primary transplantation [n = 201], retransplantation [n = 20]). Indications, surgical factors, and outcomes of allograft enterectomy were investigated. RESULTS: Reasons for isolated enterectomy included systemic infection in 11, gastrointestinal bleeding in 1, and severe electrolyte imbalance in 1, all of which were associated with rejection. One isolated intestinal transplantation patient underwent isolated enterectomy due to cytomegalovirus enteritis. One multivisceral transplantation patient underwent isolated allograft enterectomy due to bowel necrosis. Of these 15 patients, 3 died from persistent infection postoperatively, whereas 8 underwent retransplantation with median interval of 74 days (42-252 days). Allosensitization occurred between isolated enterectomy and retransplantation in 2, one of whom lost the second graft due to rejection. Simultaneous allograft enterectomy and retransplantation was performed in 3 isolated intestinal transplantation and 9 multivisceral transplantation patients. Patient survival after retransplantation was similar between patients who underwent isolated allograft enterectomy and those who did simultaneous enterectomy with retransplantation (P = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: In cases of irreversible intestinal graft dysfunction, isolated allograft enterectomy successfully provides recovery from comorbidities as a lifesaving procedure and does not compromise outcomes of retransplantation.

AB - BACKGROUND: Intestinal graft dysfunction is sometimes irreversible and requires allograft enterectomy with or without retransplantation. There is no comprehensive assessment of allograft enterectomy regarding indications and outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate management of patients with intestinal graft failure with special reference to indications and outcomes of allograft enterectomy and the procedureʼs validity as a bridge to retransplantation. METHODS: Graft and patient survivals, reason for graft failure, and rejection episodes were evaluated in 221 intestinal recipients (primary transplantation [n = 201], retransplantation [n = 20]). Indications, surgical factors, and outcomes of allograft enterectomy were investigated. RESULTS: Reasons for isolated enterectomy included systemic infection in 11, gastrointestinal bleeding in 1, and severe electrolyte imbalance in 1, all of which were associated with rejection. One isolated intestinal transplantation patient underwent isolated enterectomy due to cytomegalovirus enteritis. One multivisceral transplantation patient underwent isolated allograft enterectomy due to bowel necrosis. Of these 15 patients, 3 died from persistent infection postoperatively, whereas 8 underwent retransplantation with median interval of 74 days (42-252 days). Allosensitization occurred between isolated enterectomy and retransplantation in 2, one of whom lost the second graft due to rejection. Simultaneous allograft enterectomy and retransplantation was performed in 3 isolated intestinal transplantation and 9 multivisceral transplantation patients. Patient survival after retransplantation was similar between patients who underwent isolated allograft enterectomy and those who did simultaneous enterectomy with retransplantation (P = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: In cases of irreversible intestinal graft dysfunction, isolated allograft enterectomy successfully provides recovery from comorbidities as a lifesaving procedure and does not compromise outcomes of retransplantation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959119423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959119423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TP.0000000000001102

DO - 10.1097/TP.0000000000001102

M3 - Article

C2 - 26901076

AN - SCOPUS:84959119423

JO - Transplantation

JF - Transplantation

SN - 0041-1337

ER -