Intrinsically disordered domains: Sequence ➔ disorder ➔ function relationships

Jianhong Zhou, Christopher J. Oldfield, Wenying Yan, Bairong Shen, A. Dunker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Disordered domains are long regions of intrinsic disorder that ideally have conserved sequences, conserved disorder, and conserved functions. These domains were first noticed in protein–protein interactions that are distinct from the interactions between two structured domains and the interactions between structured domains and linear motifs or molecular recognition features (MoRFs). So far, disordered domains have not been systematically characterized. Here, we present a bioinformatics investigation of the sequence–disorder–function relationships for a set of probable disordered domains (PDDs) identified from the Pfam database. All the Pfam seed proteins from those domains with at least one PDD sequence were collected. Most often, if a set contains one PDD sequence, then all members of the set are PDDs or nearly so. However, many seed sets have sequence collections that exhibit diverse proportions of predicted disorder and structure, thus giving the completely unexpected result that conserved sequences can vary substantially in predicted disorder and structure. In addition to the induction of structure by binding to protein partners, disordered domains are also induced to form structure by disulfide bond formation, by ion binding, and by complex formation with RNA or DNA. The two new findings, (a) that conserved sequences can vary substantially in their predicted disorder content and (b) that homologues from a single domain can evolve from structure to disorder (or vice versa), enrich our understanding of the sequence ➔ disorder ensemble ➔ function paradigm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1652-1663
Number of pages12
JournalProtein Science
Volume28
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Conserved Sequence
Seed
Molecular recognition
Seeds
Bioinformatics
Disulfides
Proteins
RNA
Ions
Computational Biology
DNA
Carrier Proteins
Databases

Keywords

  • disorder-to-structure transitions
  • disorder–function relationships
  • intrinsically disordered domains

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology

Cite this

Intrinsically disordered domains : Sequence ➔ disorder ➔ function relationships. / Zhou, Jianhong; Oldfield, Christopher J.; Yan, Wenying; Shen, Bairong; Dunker, A.

In: Protein Science, Vol. 28, No. 9, 01.01.2019, p. 1652-1663.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhou, Jianhong ; Oldfield, Christopher J. ; Yan, Wenying ; Shen, Bairong ; Dunker, A. / Intrinsically disordered domains : Sequence ➔ disorder ➔ function relationships. In: Protein Science. 2019 ; Vol. 28, No. 9. pp. 1652-1663.
@article{ae388369fb2945f899463f442483928a,
title = "Intrinsically disordered domains: Sequence ➔ disorder ➔ function relationships",
abstract = "Disordered domains are long regions of intrinsic disorder that ideally have conserved sequences, conserved disorder, and conserved functions. These domains were first noticed in protein–protein interactions that are distinct from the interactions between two structured domains and the interactions between structured domains and linear motifs or molecular recognition features (MoRFs). So far, disordered domains have not been systematically characterized. Here, we present a bioinformatics investigation of the sequence–disorder–function relationships for a set of probable disordered domains (PDDs) identified from the Pfam database. All the Pfam seed proteins from those domains with at least one PDD sequence were collected. Most often, if a set contains one PDD sequence, then all members of the set are PDDs or nearly so. However, many seed sets have sequence collections that exhibit diverse proportions of predicted disorder and structure, thus giving the completely unexpected result that conserved sequences can vary substantially in predicted disorder and structure. In addition to the induction of structure by binding to protein partners, disordered domains are also induced to form structure by disulfide bond formation, by ion binding, and by complex formation with RNA or DNA. The two new findings, (a) that conserved sequences can vary substantially in their predicted disorder content and (b) that homologues from a single domain can evolve from structure to disorder (or vice versa), enrich our understanding of the sequence ➔ disorder ensemble ➔ function paradigm.",
keywords = "disorder-to-structure transitions, disorder–function relationships, intrinsically disordered domains",
author = "Jianhong Zhou and Oldfield, {Christopher J.} and Wenying Yan and Bairong Shen and A. Dunker",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/pro.3680",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "1652--1663",
journal = "Protein Science",
issn = "0961-8368",
publisher = "Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intrinsically disordered domains

T2 - Sequence ➔ disorder ➔ function relationships

AU - Zhou, Jianhong

AU - Oldfield, Christopher J.

AU - Yan, Wenying

AU - Shen, Bairong

AU - Dunker, A.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Disordered domains are long regions of intrinsic disorder that ideally have conserved sequences, conserved disorder, and conserved functions. These domains were first noticed in protein–protein interactions that are distinct from the interactions between two structured domains and the interactions between structured domains and linear motifs or molecular recognition features (MoRFs). So far, disordered domains have not been systematically characterized. Here, we present a bioinformatics investigation of the sequence–disorder–function relationships for a set of probable disordered domains (PDDs) identified from the Pfam database. All the Pfam seed proteins from those domains with at least one PDD sequence were collected. Most often, if a set contains one PDD sequence, then all members of the set are PDDs or nearly so. However, many seed sets have sequence collections that exhibit diverse proportions of predicted disorder and structure, thus giving the completely unexpected result that conserved sequences can vary substantially in predicted disorder and structure. In addition to the induction of structure by binding to protein partners, disordered domains are also induced to form structure by disulfide bond formation, by ion binding, and by complex formation with RNA or DNA. The two new findings, (a) that conserved sequences can vary substantially in their predicted disorder content and (b) that homologues from a single domain can evolve from structure to disorder (or vice versa), enrich our understanding of the sequence ➔ disorder ensemble ➔ function paradigm.

AB - Disordered domains are long regions of intrinsic disorder that ideally have conserved sequences, conserved disorder, and conserved functions. These domains were first noticed in protein–protein interactions that are distinct from the interactions between two structured domains and the interactions between structured domains and linear motifs or molecular recognition features (MoRFs). So far, disordered domains have not been systematically characterized. Here, we present a bioinformatics investigation of the sequence–disorder–function relationships for a set of probable disordered domains (PDDs) identified from the Pfam database. All the Pfam seed proteins from those domains with at least one PDD sequence were collected. Most often, if a set contains one PDD sequence, then all members of the set are PDDs or nearly so. However, many seed sets have sequence collections that exhibit diverse proportions of predicted disorder and structure, thus giving the completely unexpected result that conserved sequences can vary substantially in predicted disorder and structure. In addition to the induction of structure by binding to protein partners, disordered domains are also induced to form structure by disulfide bond formation, by ion binding, and by complex formation with RNA or DNA. The two new findings, (a) that conserved sequences can vary substantially in their predicted disorder content and (b) that homologues from a single domain can evolve from structure to disorder (or vice versa), enrich our understanding of the sequence ➔ disorder ensemble ➔ function paradigm.

KW - disorder-to-structure transitions

KW - disorder–function relationships

KW - intrinsically disordered domains

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070472233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070472233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pro.3680

DO - 10.1002/pro.3680

M3 - Article

C2 - 31299122

AN - SCOPUS:85070472233

VL - 28

SP - 1652

EP - 1663

JO - Protein Science

JF - Protein Science

SN - 0961-8368

IS - 9

ER -