Invasive and noninvasive implants in ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential

Helen Michael, L. M. Roth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential ('borderline' serous tumors) are classified according to the histologic features of the primary ovarian tumor, without regard to any coexisting extraovarian disease. The peritoneal implants display a range of histologic appearances, ranging from benign glands (endosalpingiosis), to noninvasive papillary glandular proliferations resembling the ovarian neoplasms, to irregular glands associated with a desmoplastic stroma and having features of invasive disease. This review of 16 patients with histologically documented extraovarian tumor implants seen at Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, and 13 patients whose tumor implants have been previously described in the literature indicates that the clinical stage of disease has much greater prognostic significance than does the implant histologic features. There is a tendency for patients with more advanced disease to have invasive implants. However, within a given clinical stage, disease progression or recurrence was not influenced by the presence or absence of invasive histologic characteristics in the tumor implants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1240-1247
Number of pages8
JournalCancer
Volume57
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1986

Fingerprint

Neoplasms
Ovarian Neoplasms
Disease Progression
Recurrence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Invasive and noninvasive implants in ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential. / Michael, Helen; Roth, L. M.

In: Cancer, Vol. 57, No. 6, 1986, p. 1240-1247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{87f3adde34e44ccd894b2303b29ac586,
title = "Invasive and noninvasive implants in ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential",
abstract = "Ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential ('borderline' serous tumors) are classified according to the histologic features of the primary ovarian tumor, without regard to any coexisting extraovarian disease. The peritoneal implants display a range of histologic appearances, ranging from benign glands (endosalpingiosis), to noninvasive papillary glandular proliferations resembling the ovarian neoplasms, to irregular glands associated with a desmoplastic stroma and having features of invasive disease. This review of 16 patients with histologically documented extraovarian tumor implants seen at Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, and 13 patients whose tumor implants have been previously described in the literature indicates that the clinical stage of disease has much greater prognostic significance than does the implant histologic features. There is a tendency for patients with more advanced disease to have invasive implants. However, within a given clinical stage, disease progression or recurrence was not influenced by the presence or absence of invasive histologic characteristics in the tumor implants.",
author = "Helen Michael and Roth, {L. M.}",
year = "1986",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "1240--1247",
journal = "Cancer",
issn = "0008-543X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Invasive and noninvasive implants in ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential

AU - Michael, Helen

AU - Roth, L. M.

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - Ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential ('borderline' serous tumors) are classified according to the histologic features of the primary ovarian tumor, without regard to any coexisting extraovarian disease. The peritoneal implants display a range of histologic appearances, ranging from benign glands (endosalpingiosis), to noninvasive papillary glandular proliferations resembling the ovarian neoplasms, to irregular glands associated with a desmoplastic stroma and having features of invasive disease. This review of 16 patients with histologically documented extraovarian tumor implants seen at Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, and 13 patients whose tumor implants have been previously described in the literature indicates that the clinical stage of disease has much greater prognostic significance than does the implant histologic features. There is a tendency for patients with more advanced disease to have invasive implants. However, within a given clinical stage, disease progression or recurrence was not influenced by the presence or absence of invasive histologic characteristics in the tumor implants.

AB - Ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential ('borderline' serous tumors) are classified according to the histologic features of the primary ovarian tumor, without regard to any coexisting extraovarian disease. The peritoneal implants display a range of histologic appearances, ranging from benign glands (endosalpingiosis), to noninvasive papillary glandular proliferations resembling the ovarian neoplasms, to irregular glands associated with a desmoplastic stroma and having features of invasive disease. This review of 16 patients with histologically documented extraovarian tumor implants seen at Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, and 13 patients whose tumor implants have been previously described in the literature indicates that the clinical stage of disease has much greater prognostic significance than does the implant histologic features. There is a tendency for patients with more advanced disease to have invasive implants. However, within a given clinical stage, disease progression or recurrence was not influenced by the presence or absence of invasive histologic characteristics in the tumor implants.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022623689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022623689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 1240

EP - 1247

JO - Cancer

JF - Cancer

SN - 0008-543X

IS - 6

ER -