Investigating response bias in an information technology survey of physicians

Nir Menachemi, Neset Hikmet, Mary Stutzman, Robert G. Brooks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Monitoring the diffusion of electronic health records (EHR) into ambulatory clinical practice has important policy implications. However, estimates of EHR use are typically derived from survey data and may be subject to significant response bias. The current study is a retrospective analysis testing for response bias in a large information technology survey of physicians (n=14,921). To detect bias, respondents were compared to nonrespondents on known characteristics. Moreover, early respondents were compared to late respondents with respect to key variables in the survey that are likely to influence participation. The 4203 respondents (28.2% participation rate) did not differ demographically from nonrespondents. Response rates, by specialty, differed slightly. When comparing early and late survey respondents, no differences were detected in EHR use, length of time since EHR installation, practice size, physician age, years since medical school graduation, and years of practice in their current community. Overall, response bias was not detected using established methodologies in this mailed survey of physician EHR use. Similar surveys of physicians, even with a lower than expected response rate, may still be valid.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-282
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Medical Systems
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Information technology
Technology
Physicians
Health
Electronic Health Records
Surveys and Questionnaires
Monitoring
Testing
Medical Schools

Keywords

  • Information technologies
  • Mailed survey
  • Physician EHR use
  • Response bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Information Systems
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Investigating response bias in an information technology survey of physicians. / Menachemi, Nir; Hikmet, Neset; Stutzman, Mary; Brooks, Robert G.

In: Journal of Medical Systems, Vol. 30, No. 4, 01.08.2006, p. 277-282.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Menachemi, Nir ; Hikmet, Neset ; Stutzman, Mary ; Brooks, Robert G. / Investigating response bias in an information technology survey of physicians. In: Journal of Medical Systems. 2006 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 277-282.
@article{879e71e55ca348f1979afa69ace59d9d,
title = "Investigating response bias in an information technology survey of physicians",
abstract = "Monitoring the diffusion of electronic health records (EHR) into ambulatory clinical practice has important policy implications. However, estimates of EHR use are typically derived from survey data and may be subject to significant response bias. The current study is a retrospective analysis testing for response bias in a large information technology survey of physicians (n=14,921). To detect bias, respondents were compared to nonrespondents on known characteristics. Moreover, early respondents were compared to late respondents with respect to key variables in the survey that are likely to influence participation. The 4203 respondents (28.2{\%} participation rate) did not differ demographically from nonrespondents. Response rates, by specialty, differed slightly. When comparing early and late survey respondents, no differences were detected in EHR use, length of time since EHR installation, practice size, physician age, years since medical school graduation, and years of practice in their current community. Overall, response bias was not detected using established methodologies in this mailed survey of physician EHR use. Similar surveys of physicians, even with a lower than expected response rate, may still be valid.",
keywords = "Information technologies, Mailed survey, Physician EHR use, Response bias",
author = "Nir Menachemi and Neset Hikmet and Mary Stutzman and Brooks, {Robert G.}",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10916-005-9009-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "277--282",
journal = "Journal of Medical Systems",
issn = "0148-5598",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating response bias in an information technology survey of physicians

AU - Menachemi, Nir

AU - Hikmet, Neset

AU - Stutzman, Mary

AU - Brooks, Robert G.

PY - 2006/8/1

Y1 - 2006/8/1

N2 - Monitoring the diffusion of electronic health records (EHR) into ambulatory clinical practice has important policy implications. However, estimates of EHR use are typically derived from survey data and may be subject to significant response bias. The current study is a retrospective analysis testing for response bias in a large information technology survey of physicians (n=14,921). To detect bias, respondents were compared to nonrespondents on known characteristics. Moreover, early respondents were compared to late respondents with respect to key variables in the survey that are likely to influence participation. The 4203 respondents (28.2% participation rate) did not differ demographically from nonrespondents. Response rates, by specialty, differed slightly. When comparing early and late survey respondents, no differences were detected in EHR use, length of time since EHR installation, practice size, physician age, years since medical school graduation, and years of practice in their current community. Overall, response bias was not detected using established methodologies in this mailed survey of physician EHR use. Similar surveys of physicians, even with a lower than expected response rate, may still be valid.

AB - Monitoring the diffusion of electronic health records (EHR) into ambulatory clinical practice has important policy implications. However, estimates of EHR use are typically derived from survey data and may be subject to significant response bias. The current study is a retrospective analysis testing for response bias in a large information technology survey of physicians (n=14,921). To detect bias, respondents were compared to nonrespondents on known characteristics. Moreover, early respondents were compared to late respondents with respect to key variables in the survey that are likely to influence participation. The 4203 respondents (28.2% participation rate) did not differ demographically from nonrespondents. Response rates, by specialty, differed slightly. When comparing early and late survey respondents, no differences were detected in EHR use, length of time since EHR installation, practice size, physician age, years since medical school graduation, and years of practice in their current community. Overall, response bias was not detected using established methodologies in this mailed survey of physician EHR use. Similar surveys of physicians, even with a lower than expected response rate, may still be valid.

KW - Information technologies

KW - Mailed survey

KW - Physician EHR use

KW - Response bias

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744819800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33744819800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10916-005-9009-5

DO - 10.1007/s10916-005-9009-5

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 277

EP - 282

JO - Journal of Medical Systems

JF - Journal of Medical Systems

SN - 0148-5598

IS - 4

ER -