Investigators' successful strategies for working with institutional review boards

Juliana C. Cartwright, Susan Hickman, Christine A. Nelson, Kathleen A. Knafl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study was designed to identify successful strategies used by investigators for working with their Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in conducting human subjects research. Telephone interviews were conducted with 46 investigators representing nursing, medicine, and social work. Interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. Investigators emphasized the importance of intentionally cultivating positive relationships with IRB staff and members, and managing bureaucracy. A few used evasive measures to avoid conflict with IRBs. Few successful strategies were identified for working with multiple IRBs. Although most investigators developed successful methods for working with IRBs, further research is needed on how differences in IRB culture affect human subjects protection, and on best approaches for obtaining IRB approval of multi-site studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)478-486
Number of pages9
JournalResearch in Nursing and Health
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Research Ethics Committees
Research Personnel
Interviews
Social Work
Research
Nursing
Medicine

Keywords

  • Human subjects protection
  • Human subjects research
  • Institutional review board
  • Qualitative
  • Research ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Investigators' successful strategies for working with institutional review boards. / Cartwright, Juliana C.; Hickman, Susan; Nelson, Christine A.; Knafl, Kathleen A.

In: Research in Nursing and Health, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2013, p. 478-486.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cartwright, Juliana C. ; Hickman, Susan ; Nelson, Christine A. ; Knafl, Kathleen A. / Investigators' successful strategies for working with institutional review boards. In: Research in Nursing and Health. 2013 ; Vol. 36, No. 5. pp. 478-486.
@article{54b6e2d0e4b34a31bd56e91e0e3ed3bf,
title = "Investigators' successful strategies for working with institutional review boards",
abstract = "This study was designed to identify successful strategies used by investigators for working with their Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in conducting human subjects research. Telephone interviews were conducted with 46 investigators representing nursing, medicine, and social work. Interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. Investigators emphasized the importance of intentionally cultivating positive relationships with IRB staff and members, and managing bureaucracy. A few used evasive measures to avoid conflict with IRBs. Few successful strategies were identified for working with multiple IRBs. Although most investigators developed successful methods for working with IRBs, further research is needed on how differences in IRB culture affect human subjects protection, and on best approaches for obtaining IRB approval of multi-site studies.",
keywords = "Human subjects protection, Human subjects research, Institutional review board, Qualitative, Research ethics",
author = "Cartwright, {Juliana C.} and Susan Hickman and Nelson, {Christine A.} and Knafl, {Kathleen A.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1002/nur.21553",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "478--486",
journal = "Research in Nursing and Health",
issn = "0160-6891",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigators' successful strategies for working with institutional review boards

AU - Cartwright, Juliana C.

AU - Hickman, Susan

AU - Nelson, Christine A.

AU - Knafl, Kathleen A.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This study was designed to identify successful strategies used by investigators for working with their Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in conducting human subjects research. Telephone interviews were conducted with 46 investigators representing nursing, medicine, and social work. Interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. Investigators emphasized the importance of intentionally cultivating positive relationships with IRB staff and members, and managing bureaucracy. A few used evasive measures to avoid conflict with IRBs. Few successful strategies were identified for working with multiple IRBs. Although most investigators developed successful methods for working with IRBs, further research is needed on how differences in IRB culture affect human subjects protection, and on best approaches for obtaining IRB approval of multi-site studies.

AB - This study was designed to identify successful strategies used by investigators for working with their Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in conducting human subjects research. Telephone interviews were conducted with 46 investigators representing nursing, medicine, and social work. Interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. Investigators emphasized the importance of intentionally cultivating positive relationships with IRB staff and members, and managing bureaucracy. A few used evasive measures to avoid conflict with IRBs. Few successful strategies were identified for working with multiple IRBs. Although most investigators developed successful methods for working with IRBs, further research is needed on how differences in IRB culture affect human subjects protection, and on best approaches for obtaining IRB approval of multi-site studies.

KW - Human subjects protection

KW - Human subjects research

KW - Institutional review board

KW - Qualitative

KW - Research ethics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891723419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891723419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/nur.21553

DO - 10.1002/nur.21553

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 478

EP - 486

JO - Research in Nursing and Health

JF - Research in Nursing and Health

SN - 0160-6891

IS - 5

ER -