Is the clean-catch midstream void procedure necessary for obtaining urine culture specimens from men?

Benjamin A. Lipsky, Thomas Inui, James J. Plorde, Richard E. Berger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To determine whether the results of voided urine cultures in men are affected by meatal cleansing, midstream sampling, or circumcision status, 308 paired (initial and midstream) specimens were collected from 254 urology clinic patients. Half of the patients cleansed their urethral meatus with povidone-iodine prior to voiding. The circumcision status of all patients was noted. The rates of true bacteriuria (growth of 104 or greater colony-forming units/ml urine with a single predominant species) and contamination (growth of 103 or greater colony-forming units/ml urine with two or more colonial types) were compared in the various collection technique subgroups. Neither the bacteriuria nor contamination rates were significantly different (p > 0.05) in circumcised and uncircumcised patients, or in those who cleansed their meatus and those who did not. Contamination, but not bacteriuria, rates were higher in initial as compared with midstream specimens. These data suggest that the clean-catch midstream void procedure is unnecessary for obtaining routine voided urine culture specimens from men.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-262
Number of pages6
JournalThe American Journal of Medicine
Volume76
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bacteriuria
Urine
Stem Cells
Povidone-Iodine
Unnecessary Procedures
Urology
Growth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Is the clean-catch midstream void procedure necessary for obtaining urine culture specimens from men? / Lipsky, Benjamin A.; Inui, Thomas; Plorde, James J.; Berger, Richard E.

In: The American Journal of Medicine, Vol. 76, No. 2, 1984, p. 257-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lipsky, Benjamin A. ; Inui, Thomas ; Plorde, James J. ; Berger, Richard E. / Is the clean-catch midstream void procedure necessary for obtaining urine culture specimens from men?. In: The American Journal of Medicine. 1984 ; Vol. 76, No. 2. pp. 257-262.
@article{8de7cc00605741878dfd9d81681b17c3,
title = "Is the clean-catch midstream void procedure necessary for obtaining urine culture specimens from men?",
abstract = "To determine whether the results of voided urine cultures in men are affected by meatal cleansing, midstream sampling, or circumcision status, 308 paired (initial and midstream) specimens were collected from 254 urology clinic patients. Half of the patients cleansed their urethral meatus with povidone-iodine prior to voiding. The circumcision status of all patients was noted. The rates of true bacteriuria (growth of 104 or greater colony-forming units/ml urine with a single predominant species) and contamination (growth of 103 or greater colony-forming units/ml urine with two or more colonial types) were compared in the various collection technique subgroups. Neither the bacteriuria nor contamination rates were significantly different (p > 0.05) in circumcised and uncircumcised patients, or in those who cleansed their meatus and those who did not. Contamination, but not bacteriuria, rates were higher in initial as compared with midstream specimens. These data suggest that the clean-catch midstream void procedure is unnecessary for obtaining routine voided urine culture specimens from men.",
author = "Lipsky, {Benjamin A.} and Thomas Inui and Plorde, {James J.} and Berger, {Richard E.}",
year = "1984",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9343(84)90782-4",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "257--262",
journal = "American Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0002-9343",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the clean-catch midstream void procedure necessary for obtaining urine culture specimens from men?

AU - Lipsky, Benjamin A.

AU - Inui, Thomas

AU - Plorde, James J.

AU - Berger, Richard E.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - To determine whether the results of voided urine cultures in men are affected by meatal cleansing, midstream sampling, or circumcision status, 308 paired (initial and midstream) specimens were collected from 254 urology clinic patients. Half of the patients cleansed their urethral meatus with povidone-iodine prior to voiding. The circumcision status of all patients was noted. The rates of true bacteriuria (growth of 104 or greater colony-forming units/ml urine with a single predominant species) and contamination (growth of 103 or greater colony-forming units/ml urine with two or more colonial types) were compared in the various collection technique subgroups. Neither the bacteriuria nor contamination rates were significantly different (p > 0.05) in circumcised and uncircumcised patients, or in those who cleansed their meatus and those who did not. Contamination, but not bacteriuria, rates were higher in initial as compared with midstream specimens. These data suggest that the clean-catch midstream void procedure is unnecessary for obtaining routine voided urine culture specimens from men.

AB - To determine whether the results of voided urine cultures in men are affected by meatal cleansing, midstream sampling, or circumcision status, 308 paired (initial and midstream) specimens were collected from 254 urology clinic patients. Half of the patients cleansed their urethral meatus with povidone-iodine prior to voiding. The circumcision status of all patients was noted. The rates of true bacteriuria (growth of 104 or greater colony-forming units/ml urine with a single predominant species) and contamination (growth of 103 or greater colony-forming units/ml urine with two or more colonial types) were compared in the various collection technique subgroups. Neither the bacteriuria nor contamination rates were significantly different (p > 0.05) in circumcised and uncircumcised patients, or in those who cleansed their meatus and those who did not. Contamination, but not bacteriuria, rates were higher in initial as compared with midstream specimens. These data suggest that the clean-catch midstream void procedure is unnecessary for obtaining routine voided urine culture specimens from men.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021355556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021355556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9343(84)90782-4

DO - 10.1016/0002-9343(84)90782-4

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 257

EP - 262

JO - American Journal of Medicine

JF - American Journal of Medicine

SN - 0002-9343

IS - 2

ER -