Item response modeling of DSM-IV mania symptoms in two representative US epidemiological samples

A. Agrawal, John Nurnberger, M. T. Lynskey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background There is considerable debate surrounding the effective measurement of DSM-IV symptoms used to assess manic disorders in epidemiological samples.Method Using two nationally representative datasets, the National Epidemiological Survey of Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC, n=43 093 at wave 1, n=34 653 at 3-year follow-up) and the National Comorbidity Survey - Replication (NCS-R, n=9282), we examined the psychometric properties of symptoms used to assess DSM-IV mania. The predictive utility of the mania factor score was tested using the 3-year follow-up data in NESARC.Results Criterion B symptoms were unidimensional (single factor) in both samples. The symptoms assessing flight of ideas, distractibility and increased goal-directed activities had high factor loadings (0.70-0.93) with moderate rates of endorsement, thus providing good discrimination between individuals with and without mania. The symptom assessing grandiosity performed less well in both samples. The quantitative mania factor score was a good predictor of more severe disorders at the 3-year follow-up in the NESARC sample, even after controlling for a past history of DSM-IV diagnosis of manic disorder.Conclusions These analyses suggest that questions based on some DSM symptoms effectively discriminate between individuals at high and low liability to mania, but others do not. A quantitative mania factor score may aid in predicting recurrence for patients with a history of mania. Methods for assessing mania using structured interviews in the absence of clinical assessment require further refinement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1549-1558
Number of pages10
JournalPsychological Medicine
Volume40
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Bipolar Disorder
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Psychometrics
Comorbidity
Alcohols
Interviews
Recurrence

Keywords

  • Item response
  • mania
  • NCS-R
  • NESARC
  • unidimensional

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Item response modeling of DSM-IV mania symptoms in two representative US epidemiological samples. / Agrawal, A.; Nurnberger, John; Lynskey, M. T.

In: Psychological Medicine, Vol. 40, No. 9, 09.2010, p. 1549-1558.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f3701bc689ce4de2893966ae42a057e0,
title = "Item response modeling of DSM-IV mania symptoms in two representative US epidemiological samples",
abstract = "Background There is considerable debate surrounding the effective measurement of DSM-IV symptoms used to assess manic disorders in epidemiological samples.Method Using two nationally representative datasets, the National Epidemiological Survey of Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC, n=43 093 at wave 1, n=34 653 at 3-year follow-up) and the National Comorbidity Survey - Replication (NCS-R, n=9282), we examined the psychometric properties of symptoms used to assess DSM-IV mania. The predictive utility of the mania factor score was tested using the 3-year follow-up data in NESARC.Results Criterion B symptoms were unidimensional (single factor) in both samples. The symptoms assessing flight of ideas, distractibility and increased goal-directed activities had high factor loadings (0.70-0.93) with moderate rates of endorsement, thus providing good discrimination between individuals with and without mania. The symptom assessing grandiosity performed less well in both samples. The quantitative mania factor score was a good predictor of more severe disorders at the 3-year follow-up in the NESARC sample, even after controlling for a past history of DSM-IV diagnosis of manic disorder.Conclusions These analyses suggest that questions based on some DSM symptoms effectively discriminate between individuals at high and low liability to mania, but others do not. A quantitative mania factor score may aid in predicting recurrence for patients with a history of mania. Methods for assessing mania using structured interviews in the absence of clinical assessment require further refinement.",
keywords = "Item response, mania, NCS-R, NESARC, unidimensional",
author = "A. Agrawal and John Nurnberger and Lynskey, {M. T.}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1017/S0033291709992005",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "1549--1558",
journal = "Psychological Medicine",
issn = "0033-2917",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Item response modeling of DSM-IV mania symptoms in two representative US epidemiological samples

AU - Agrawal, A.

AU - Nurnberger, John

AU - Lynskey, M. T.

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Background There is considerable debate surrounding the effective measurement of DSM-IV symptoms used to assess manic disorders in epidemiological samples.Method Using two nationally representative datasets, the National Epidemiological Survey of Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC, n=43 093 at wave 1, n=34 653 at 3-year follow-up) and the National Comorbidity Survey - Replication (NCS-R, n=9282), we examined the psychometric properties of symptoms used to assess DSM-IV mania. The predictive utility of the mania factor score was tested using the 3-year follow-up data in NESARC.Results Criterion B symptoms were unidimensional (single factor) in both samples. The symptoms assessing flight of ideas, distractibility and increased goal-directed activities had high factor loadings (0.70-0.93) with moderate rates of endorsement, thus providing good discrimination between individuals with and without mania. The symptom assessing grandiosity performed less well in both samples. The quantitative mania factor score was a good predictor of more severe disorders at the 3-year follow-up in the NESARC sample, even after controlling for a past history of DSM-IV diagnosis of manic disorder.Conclusions These analyses suggest that questions based on some DSM symptoms effectively discriminate between individuals at high and low liability to mania, but others do not. A quantitative mania factor score may aid in predicting recurrence for patients with a history of mania. Methods for assessing mania using structured interviews in the absence of clinical assessment require further refinement.

AB - Background There is considerable debate surrounding the effective measurement of DSM-IV symptoms used to assess manic disorders in epidemiological samples.Method Using two nationally representative datasets, the National Epidemiological Survey of Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC, n=43 093 at wave 1, n=34 653 at 3-year follow-up) and the National Comorbidity Survey - Replication (NCS-R, n=9282), we examined the psychometric properties of symptoms used to assess DSM-IV mania. The predictive utility of the mania factor score was tested using the 3-year follow-up data in NESARC.Results Criterion B symptoms were unidimensional (single factor) in both samples. The symptoms assessing flight of ideas, distractibility and increased goal-directed activities had high factor loadings (0.70-0.93) with moderate rates of endorsement, thus providing good discrimination between individuals with and without mania. The symptom assessing grandiosity performed less well in both samples. The quantitative mania factor score was a good predictor of more severe disorders at the 3-year follow-up in the NESARC sample, even after controlling for a past history of DSM-IV diagnosis of manic disorder.Conclusions These analyses suggest that questions based on some DSM symptoms effectively discriminate between individuals at high and low liability to mania, but others do not. A quantitative mania factor score may aid in predicting recurrence for patients with a history of mania. Methods for assessing mania using structured interviews in the absence of clinical assessment require further refinement.

KW - Item response

KW - mania

KW - NCS-R

KW - NESARC

KW - unidimensional

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957147072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957147072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0033291709992005

DO - 10.1017/S0033291709992005

M3 - Article

C2 - 19951450

AN - SCOPUS:77957147072

VL - 40

SP - 1549

EP - 1558

JO - Psychological Medicine

JF - Psychological Medicine

SN - 0033-2917

IS - 9

ER -