Journal rankings by health management faculty members: Are there differences by rank, leadership status, or area of expertise?

Nir Menachemi, Tory H. Hogan, Jami L. DelliFraine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Health administration (HA) faculty members publish in a variety of journals, including journals focused on management, economics, policy, and information technology. HA faculty members are evaluated on the basis of the quality and quantity of their journal publications. However, it is unclear how perceptions of these journals vary by subdiscipline, department leadership role, or faculty rank. It is also not clear how perceptions of journals may have changed over the past decade since the last evaluation of journal rankings in the field was published. The purpose of the current study is to examine how respondents rank journals in the field of HA, as well as the variation in perception by academic rank, department leadership status, and area of expertise. Data were drawn from a survey of HA faculty members at U.S. universities which was completed in 2012. Different journal ranking patterns were noted for faculty members of different subdisciplines. The health management-oriented journals (Health Care Management Review and Journal of Healthcare Management) were ranked higher than in previous research, suggesting that journal ranking perceptions may have changed over the intervening decade. Few differences in perceptions were noted by academic rank, but we found that department chairs were more likely than others to select Health Affairs in their top three most prestigious journals ( = 0.768 p < .01). Perceived journal prestige varied between a department chair and untenured faculty in different disciplines, and this perceived difference could have implications for promotion and tenure decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-28
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Healthcare Management
Volume60
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health
Health management
Expertise
Journal ranking
Delivery of Health Care
Health Surveys
Publications
Economics
Technology
Health care management
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Policy
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Journal rankings by health management faculty members : Are there differences by rank, leadership status, or area of expertise? / Menachemi, Nir; Hogan, Tory H.; DelliFraine, Jami L.

In: Journal of Healthcare Management, Vol. 60, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 17-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fe8944ef12bd4c278c3106d82a3c34a2,
title = "Journal rankings by health management faculty members: Are there differences by rank, leadership status, or area of expertise?",
abstract = "Health administration (HA) faculty members publish in a variety of journals, including journals focused on management, economics, policy, and information technology. HA faculty members are evaluated on the basis of the quality and quantity of their journal publications. However, it is unclear how perceptions of these journals vary by subdiscipline, department leadership role, or faculty rank. It is also not clear how perceptions of journals may have changed over the past decade since the last evaluation of journal rankings in the field was published. The purpose of the current study is to examine how respondents rank journals in the field of HA, as well as the variation in perception by academic rank, department leadership status, and area of expertise. Data were drawn from a survey of HA faculty members at U.S. universities which was completed in 2012. Different journal ranking patterns were noted for faculty members of different subdisciplines. The health management-oriented journals (Health Care Management Review and Journal of Healthcare Management) were ranked higher than in previous research, suggesting that journal ranking perceptions may have changed over the intervening decade. Few differences in perceptions were noted by academic rank, but we found that department chairs were more likely than others to select Health Affairs in their top three most prestigious journals ( = 0.768 p < .01). Perceived journal prestige varied between a department chair and untenured faculty in different disciplines, and this perceived difference could have implications for promotion and tenure decisions.",
author = "Nir Menachemi and Hogan, {Tory H.} and DelliFraine, {Jami L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "17--28",
journal = "Journal of Healthcare Management",
issn = "1096-9012",
publisher = "Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Journal rankings by health management faculty members

T2 - Are there differences by rank, leadership status, or area of expertise?

AU - Menachemi, Nir

AU - Hogan, Tory H.

AU - DelliFraine, Jami L.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Health administration (HA) faculty members publish in a variety of journals, including journals focused on management, economics, policy, and information technology. HA faculty members are evaluated on the basis of the quality and quantity of their journal publications. However, it is unclear how perceptions of these journals vary by subdiscipline, department leadership role, or faculty rank. It is also not clear how perceptions of journals may have changed over the past decade since the last evaluation of journal rankings in the field was published. The purpose of the current study is to examine how respondents rank journals in the field of HA, as well as the variation in perception by academic rank, department leadership status, and area of expertise. Data were drawn from a survey of HA faculty members at U.S. universities which was completed in 2012. Different journal ranking patterns were noted for faculty members of different subdisciplines. The health management-oriented journals (Health Care Management Review and Journal of Healthcare Management) were ranked higher than in previous research, suggesting that journal ranking perceptions may have changed over the intervening decade. Few differences in perceptions were noted by academic rank, but we found that department chairs were more likely than others to select Health Affairs in their top three most prestigious journals ( = 0.768 p < .01). Perceived journal prestige varied between a department chair and untenured faculty in different disciplines, and this perceived difference could have implications for promotion and tenure decisions.

AB - Health administration (HA) faculty members publish in a variety of journals, including journals focused on management, economics, policy, and information technology. HA faculty members are evaluated on the basis of the quality and quantity of their journal publications. However, it is unclear how perceptions of these journals vary by subdiscipline, department leadership role, or faculty rank. It is also not clear how perceptions of journals may have changed over the past decade since the last evaluation of journal rankings in the field was published. The purpose of the current study is to examine how respondents rank journals in the field of HA, as well as the variation in perception by academic rank, department leadership status, and area of expertise. Data were drawn from a survey of HA faculty members at U.S. universities which was completed in 2012. Different journal ranking patterns were noted for faculty members of different subdisciplines. The health management-oriented journals (Health Care Management Review and Journal of Healthcare Management) were ranked higher than in previous research, suggesting that journal ranking perceptions may have changed over the intervening decade. Few differences in perceptions were noted by academic rank, but we found that department chairs were more likely than others to select Health Affairs in their top three most prestigious journals ( = 0.768 p < .01). Perceived journal prestige varied between a department chair and untenured faculty in different disciplines, and this perceived difference could have implications for promotion and tenure decisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953344213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953344213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 26529989

AN - SCOPUS:84953344213

VL - 60

SP - 17

EP - 28

JO - Journal of Healthcare Management

JF - Journal of Healthcare Management

SN - 1096-9012

IS - 1

ER -