Judgment pitfalls in estimating premorbid intellectual function

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Neuropsychological diagnosis first requires estimation of patients' premorbid cognitive ability. Although a number of methods have been proposed for this purpose, in practice there is little standardization. Often, clinical judgment and expert synthesis of multiple sources of information are prescribed to derive a premorbid estimate. There are, however, a number of systematic biases in human cognition that may lead clinicians to produce inaccurate estimates of premorbid function. This paper reviews the cognitive biases that are most likely to interfere with clinical judgment in this context. Given findings in the human judgment literature, actuarial strategies are recommended to avoid the contamination of cognitive bias.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)701-709
Number of pages9
JournalArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Volume12
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Cognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Judgment pitfalls in estimating premorbid intellectual function. / Kareken, David.

In: Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol. 12, No. 8, 11.1997, p. 701-709.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bede5773d07f4de5b54526a78170ce8b,
title = "Judgment pitfalls in estimating premorbid intellectual function",
abstract = "Neuropsychological diagnosis first requires estimation of patients' premorbid cognitive ability. Although a number of methods have been proposed for this purpose, in practice there is little standardization. Often, clinical judgment and expert synthesis of multiple sources of information are prescribed to derive a premorbid estimate. There are, however, a number of systematic biases in human cognition that may lead clinicians to produce inaccurate estimates of premorbid function. This paper reviews the cognitive biases that are most likely to interfere with clinical judgment in this context. Given findings in the human judgment literature, actuarial strategies are recommended to avoid the contamination of cognitive bias.",
author = "David Kareken",
year = "1997",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/S0887-6177(97)00053-X",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "701--709",
journal = "Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology",
issn = "1873-5843",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judgment pitfalls in estimating premorbid intellectual function

AU - Kareken, David

PY - 1997/11

Y1 - 1997/11

N2 - Neuropsychological diagnosis first requires estimation of patients' premorbid cognitive ability. Although a number of methods have been proposed for this purpose, in practice there is little standardization. Often, clinical judgment and expert synthesis of multiple sources of information are prescribed to derive a premorbid estimate. There are, however, a number of systematic biases in human cognition that may lead clinicians to produce inaccurate estimates of premorbid function. This paper reviews the cognitive biases that are most likely to interfere with clinical judgment in this context. Given findings in the human judgment literature, actuarial strategies are recommended to avoid the contamination of cognitive bias.

AB - Neuropsychological diagnosis first requires estimation of patients' premorbid cognitive ability. Although a number of methods have been proposed for this purpose, in practice there is little standardization. Often, clinical judgment and expert synthesis of multiple sources of information are prescribed to derive a premorbid estimate. There are, however, a number of systematic biases in human cognition that may lead clinicians to produce inaccurate estimates of premorbid function. This paper reviews the cognitive biases that are most likely to interfere with clinical judgment in this context. Given findings in the human judgment literature, actuarial strategies are recommended to avoid the contamination of cognitive bias.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030664564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030664564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0887-6177(97)00053-X

DO - 10.1016/S0887-6177(97)00053-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 14590648

AN - SCOPUS:0030664564

VL - 12

SP - 701

EP - 709

JO - Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

JF - Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

SN - 1873-5843

IS - 8

ER -