Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery for Nephrectomy as a Feasible Alternative to Traditional Laparoscopy

James H. Raybourn, Abhay Rane, Chandru Sundaram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To report an initial clinical urologic experience using single-port surgery compared to the traditional laparoscopic technique for nephrectomy. Methods: A total of 11 patients underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy using the laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) procedure, with 1 R-port used for each. A group of 10 patients who previously underwent simple nephrectomies by 1 of the 2 surgeons were selected for comparison. The intraoperative and postoperative narcotic analgesia requirements were compared between the 2 groups. The Student t test was used to compare the means. All complications, clinical data, and technical issues with performing the procedure were noted. Results: All LESS simple nephrectomy procedures were completed uneventfully. There were no intraoperative complications in the LESS group. Postoperative complications included pyrexia and port site bruising with 2 patients. Operative time showed no significant difference in the LESS group compared to the traditional laparoscopic group (151 vs 165 minutes). Narcotic analgesia requirements showed no significant difference in both intraoperative and postoperative usage analyses (P = .15 and P = .55, respectively). Conclusions: The LESS technique can be performed safely compared to traditional laparoscopy. With no significant difference in operative time and relatively few complications, this is a feasible technique for simple nephrectomy. Even though there is no significant difference in intraoperative and immediate postoperative narcotic usage, the procedure has obvious cosmetic advantages.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)100-103
Number of pages4
JournalUrology
Volume75
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Nephrectomy
Laparoscopy
Narcotics
Operative Time
Analgesia
Intraoperative Complications
Cosmetics
Fever
Students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery for Nephrectomy as a Feasible Alternative to Traditional Laparoscopy. / Raybourn, James H.; Rane, Abhay; Sundaram, Chandru.

In: Urology, Vol. 75, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 100-103.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b4934b1a9c5340cf83ec2ddd0e59e08e,
title = "Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery for Nephrectomy as a Feasible Alternative to Traditional Laparoscopy",
abstract = "Objectives: To report an initial clinical urologic experience using single-port surgery compared to the traditional laparoscopic technique for nephrectomy. Methods: A total of 11 patients underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy using the laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) procedure, with 1 R-port used for each. A group of 10 patients who previously underwent simple nephrectomies by 1 of the 2 surgeons were selected for comparison. The intraoperative and postoperative narcotic analgesia requirements were compared between the 2 groups. The Student t test was used to compare the means. All complications, clinical data, and technical issues with performing the procedure were noted. Results: All LESS simple nephrectomy procedures were completed uneventfully. There were no intraoperative complications in the LESS group. Postoperative complications included pyrexia and port site bruising with 2 patients. Operative time showed no significant difference in the LESS group compared to the traditional laparoscopic group (151 vs 165 minutes). Narcotic analgesia requirements showed no significant difference in both intraoperative and postoperative usage analyses (P = .15 and P = .55, respectively). Conclusions: The LESS technique can be performed safely compared to traditional laparoscopy. With no significant difference in operative time and relatively few complications, this is a feasible technique for simple nephrectomy. Even though there is no significant difference in intraoperative and immediate postoperative narcotic usage, the procedure has obvious cosmetic advantages.",
author = "Raybourn, {James H.} and Abhay Rane and Chandru Sundaram",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.028",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "100--103",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery for Nephrectomy as a Feasible Alternative to Traditional Laparoscopy

AU - Raybourn, James H.

AU - Rane, Abhay

AU - Sundaram, Chandru

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - Objectives: To report an initial clinical urologic experience using single-port surgery compared to the traditional laparoscopic technique for nephrectomy. Methods: A total of 11 patients underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy using the laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) procedure, with 1 R-port used for each. A group of 10 patients who previously underwent simple nephrectomies by 1 of the 2 surgeons were selected for comparison. The intraoperative and postoperative narcotic analgesia requirements were compared between the 2 groups. The Student t test was used to compare the means. All complications, clinical data, and technical issues with performing the procedure were noted. Results: All LESS simple nephrectomy procedures were completed uneventfully. There were no intraoperative complications in the LESS group. Postoperative complications included pyrexia and port site bruising with 2 patients. Operative time showed no significant difference in the LESS group compared to the traditional laparoscopic group (151 vs 165 minutes). Narcotic analgesia requirements showed no significant difference in both intraoperative and postoperative usage analyses (P = .15 and P = .55, respectively). Conclusions: The LESS technique can be performed safely compared to traditional laparoscopy. With no significant difference in operative time and relatively few complications, this is a feasible technique for simple nephrectomy. Even though there is no significant difference in intraoperative and immediate postoperative narcotic usage, the procedure has obvious cosmetic advantages.

AB - Objectives: To report an initial clinical urologic experience using single-port surgery compared to the traditional laparoscopic technique for nephrectomy. Methods: A total of 11 patients underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy using the laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) procedure, with 1 R-port used for each. A group of 10 patients who previously underwent simple nephrectomies by 1 of the 2 surgeons were selected for comparison. The intraoperative and postoperative narcotic analgesia requirements were compared between the 2 groups. The Student t test was used to compare the means. All complications, clinical data, and technical issues with performing the procedure were noted. Results: All LESS simple nephrectomy procedures were completed uneventfully. There were no intraoperative complications in the LESS group. Postoperative complications included pyrexia and port site bruising with 2 patients. Operative time showed no significant difference in the LESS group compared to the traditional laparoscopic group (151 vs 165 minutes). Narcotic analgesia requirements showed no significant difference in both intraoperative and postoperative usage analyses (P = .15 and P = .55, respectively). Conclusions: The LESS technique can be performed safely compared to traditional laparoscopy. With no significant difference in operative time and relatively few complications, this is a feasible technique for simple nephrectomy. Even though there is no significant difference in intraoperative and immediate postoperative narcotic usage, the procedure has obvious cosmetic advantages.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72249089044&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72249089044&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.028

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.028

M3 - Article

C2 - 19628259

AN - SCOPUS:72249089044

VL - 75

SP - 100

EP - 103

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 1

ER -