Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Chandru Sundaram, Gerald L. Andriole

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses the operative technique involved with a transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) followed by a review of the recent published clinical series. Recent advances in laparoscopic equipment and suturing skills has resulted in LRP becoming an acceptable option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The surgery is now established as a feasible option with acceptable early oncological results. LRP is a technically challenging surgery and requires advanced laparoscopic skills. Decreased blood loss and possibly shorter duration of catheterization seem to be the obvious advantages of LRP. The urinary continence following surgery appears satisfactory. Magnification and the better visualization that is provided during laparoscopy can theoretically result in more accurate dissection. This can result in a superior nerve-sparing technique. The LRP is a minimally invasive option with encouraging early results for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The LRP should, therefore, be studied prospectively in several large centers before it becomes an accepted option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProstate Cancer: Science and Clinical Practice
PublisherElsevier Ltd.
Pages355-362
Number of pages8
ISBN (Print)9780122869815
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Surgery
Laparoscopy
Dissection
Prostatic Neoplasms
Blood
Visualization
Catheterization
Therapeutics
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

Sundaram, C., & Andriole, G. L. (2003). Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. In Prostate Cancer: Science and Clinical Practice (pp. 355-362). Elsevier Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012286981-5/50039-2

Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. / Sundaram, Chandru; Andriole, Gerald L.

Prostate Cancer: Science and Clinical Practice. Elsevier Ltd., 2003. p. 355-362.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Sundaram, C & Andriole, GL 2003, Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. in Prostate Cancer: Science and Clinical Practice. Elsevier Ltd., pp. 355-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012286981-5/50039-2
Sundaram C, Andriole GL. Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. In Prostate Cancer: Science and Clinical Practice. Elsevier Ltd. 2003. p. 355-362 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012286981-5/50039-2
Sundaram, Chandru ; Andriole, Gerald L. / Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer: Science and Clinical Practice. Elsevier Ltd., 2003. pp. 355-362
@inbook{4616bf8bb31b4679a5e7d00be2a6fe4e,
title = "Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy",
abstract = "This chapter discusses the operative technique involved with a transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) followed by a review of the recent published clinical series. Recent advances in laparoscopic equipment and suturing skills has resulted in LRP becoming an acceptable option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The surgery is now established as a feasible option with acceptable early oncological results. LRP is a technically challenging surgery and requires advanced laparoscopic skills. Decreased blood loss and possibly shorter duration of catheterization seem to be the obvious advantages of LRP. The urinary continence following surgery appears satisfactory. Magnification and the better visualization that is provided during laparoscopy can theoretically result in more accurate dissection. This can result in a superior nerve-sparing technique. The LRP is a minimally invasive option with encouraging early results for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The LRP should, therefore, be studied prospectively in several large centers before it becomes an accepted option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.",
author = "Chandru Sundaram and Andriole, {Gerald L.}",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/B978-012286981-5/50039-2",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780122869815",
pages = "355--362",
booktitle = "Prostate Cancer: Science and Clinical Practice",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd.",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

AU - Sundaram, Chandru

AU - Andriole, Gerald L.

PY - 2003/7

Y1 - 2003/7

N2 - This chapter discusses the operative technique involved with a transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) followed by a review of the recent published clinical series. Recent advances in laparoscopic equipment and suturing skills has resulted in LRP becoming an acceptable option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The surgery is now established as a feasible option with acceptable early oncological results. LRP is a technically challenging surgery and requires advanced laparoscopic skills. Decreased blood loss and possibly shorter duration of catheterization seem to be the obvious advantages of LRP. The urinary continence following surgery appears satisfactory. Magnification and the better visualization that is provided during laparoscopy can theoretically result in more accurate dissection. This can result in a superior nerve-sparing technique. The LRP is a minimally invasive option with encouraging early results for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The LRP should, therefore, be studied prospectively in several large centers before it becomes an accepted option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

AB - This chapter discusses the operative technique involved with a transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) followed by a review of the recent published clinical series. Recent advances in laparoscopic equipment and suturing skills has resulted in LRP becoming an acceptable option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The surgery is now established as a feasible option with acceptable early oncological results. LRP is a technically challenging surgery and requires advanced laparoscopic skills. Decreased blood loss and possibly shorter duration of catheterization seem to be the obvious advantages of LRP. The urinary continence following surgery appears satisfactory. Magnification and the better visualization that is provided during laparoscopy can theoretically result in more accurate dissection. This can result in a superior nerve-sparing technique. The LRP is a minimally invasive option with encouraging early results for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The LRP should, therefore, be studied prospectively in several large centers before it becomes an accepted option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902224807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902224807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-012286981-5/50039-2

DO - 10.1016/B978-012286981-5/50039-2

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84902224807

SN - 9780122869815

SP - 355

EP - 362

BT - Prostate Cancer: Science and Clinical Practice

PB - Elsevier Ltd.

ER -