Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional study of conversion to open surgery

Sam B. Bhayani, Christian P. Pavlovich, Stephen E. Strup, Douglas M. Dahl, Jaime Landman, Michael D. Fabrizio, Chandru Sundaram, Jihad H. Kaouk, Li Ming Su

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. To perform a multi-institutional review of the incidence and factors contributing to conversion from laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) to open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) among eight surgeons. Methods. The medical records from all patients undergoing LRP at seven institutions were reviewed to assess the incidence of open conversion to RRP. The clinical, operative, pathologic, and functional outcomes of patients who required conversion were compiled and analyzed. Results. Of 670 operations, 13 (1.9%) were converted from LRP to RRP. The most common steps at which conversion occurred were the apical dissection (38%) and the posterior seminal vesicle dissection (31%). Failure to progress was the most common cause of conversion, followed by injury to adjacent structures and hypercarbia. Comorbidities associated with conversion were prior pelvic surgery and obesity (body mass index greater than 30). Six of the 13 conversions occurred in the surgeons' first 5 cases. Despite open conversion, patients were continent (no pads) (92%) and potent (44%) with at least 6 months of follow-up. Conclusions. Open conversion from LRP to RRP is an uncommon event, but is more likely to occur during a surgeon's early experience. Surgeons beginning their experience with LRP are advised to select their patients carefully to minimize the need for conversion to open surgery. Obese patients and those at risk of periprostatic adhesions should initially not be considered for LRP. Despite open conversion, the functional outcomes did not appear to be adversely affected.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-102
Number of pages4
JournalUrology
Volume63
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Conversion to Open Surgery
Prostatectomy
Dissection
Hypercapnia
Seminal Vesicles
Incidence
Medical Records
Comorbidity
Body Mass Index
Obesity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Bhayani, S. B., Pavlovich, C. P., Strup, S. E., Dahl, D. M., Landman, J., Fabrizio, M. D., ... Su, L. M. (2004). Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional study of conversion to open surgery. Urology, 63(1), 99-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.08.018

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy : A multi-institutional study of conversion to open surgery. / Bhayani, Sam B.; Pavlovich, Christian P.; Strup, Stephen E.; Dahl, Douglas M.; Landman, Jaime; Fabrizio, Michael D.; Sundaram, Chandru; Kaouk, Jihad H.; Su, Li Ming.

In: Urology, Vol. 63, No. 1, 01.2004, p. 99-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bhayani, SB, Pavlovich, CP, Strup, SE, Dahl, DM, Landman, J, Fabrizio, MD, Sundaram, C, Kaouk, JH & Su, LM 2004, 'Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional study of conversion to open surgery', Urology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 99-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.08.018
Bhayani SB, Pavlovich CP, Strup SE, Dahl DM, Landman J, Fabrizio MD et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional study of conversion to open surgery. Urology. 2004 Jan;63(1):99-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.08.018
Bhayani, Sam B. ; Pavlovich, Christian P. ; Strup, Stephen E. ; Dahl, Douglas M. ; Landman, Jaime ; Fabrizio, Michael D. ; Sundaram, Chandru ; Kaouk, Jihad H. ; Su, Li Ming. / Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy : A multi-institutional study of conversion to open surgery. In: Urology. 2004 ; Vol. 63, No. 1. pp. 99-102.
@article{2aaaaa1a47664f59bcc23775ad131392,
title = "Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional study of conversion to open surgery",
abstract = "Objectives. To perform a multi-institutional review of the incidence and factors contributing to conversion from laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) to open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) among eight surgeons. Methods. The medical records from all patients undergoing LRP at seven institutions were reviewed to assess the incidence of open conversion to RRP. The clinical, operative, pathologic, and functional outcomes of patients who required conversion were compiled and analyzed. Results. Of 670 operations, 13 (1.9{\%}) were converted from LRP to RRP. The most common steps at which conversion occurred were the apical dissection (38{\%}) and the posterior seminal vesicle dissection (31{\%}). Failure to progress was the most common cause of conversion, followed by injury to adjacent structures and hypercarbia. Comorbidities associated with conversion were prior pelvic surgery and obesity (body mass index greater than 30). Six of the 13 conversions occurred in the surgeons' first 5 cases. Despite open conversion, patients were continent (no pads) (92{\%}) and potent (44{\%}) with at least 6 months of follow-up. Conclusions. Open conversion from LRP to RRP is an uncommon event, but is more likely to occur during a surgeon's early experience. Surgeons beginning their experience with LRP are advised to select their patients carefully to minimize the need for conversion to open surgery. Obese patients and those at risk of periprostatic adhesions should initially not be considered for LRP. Despite open conversion, the functional outcomes did not appear to be adversely affected.",
author = "Bhayani, {Sam B.} and Pavlovich, {Christian P.} and Strup, {Stephen E.} and Dahl, {Douglas M.} and Jaime Landman and Fabrizio, {Michael D.} and Chandru Sundaram and Kaouk, {Jihad H.} and Su, {Li Ming}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2003.08.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "99--102",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

T2 - A multi-institutional study of conversion to open surgery

AU - Bhayani, Sam B.

AU - Pavlovich, Christian P.

AU - Strup, Stephen E.

AU - Dahl, Douglas M.

AU - Landman, Jaime

AU - Fabrizio, Michael D.

AU - Sundaram, Chandru

AU - Kaouk, Jihad H.

AU - Su, Li Ming

PY - 2004/1

Y1 - 2004/1

N2 - Objectives. To perform a multi-institutional review of the incidence and factors contributing to conversion from laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) to open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) among eight surgeons. Methods. The medical records from all patients undergoing LRP at seven institutions were reviewed to assess the incidence of open conversion to RRP. The clinical, operative, pathologic, and functional outcomes of patients who required conversion were compiled and analyzed. Results. Of 670 operations, 13 (1.9%) were converted from LRP to RRP. The most common steps at which conversion occurred were the apical dissection (38%) and the posterior seminal vesicle dissection (31%). Failure to progress was the most common cause of conversion, followed by injury to adjacent structures and hypercarbia. Comorbidities associated with conversion were prior pelvic surgery and obesity (body mass index greater than 30). Six of the 13 conversions occurred in the surgeons' first 5 cases. Despite open conversion, patients were continent (no pads) (92%) and potent (44%) with at least 6 months of follow-up. Conclusions. Open conversion from LRP to RRP is an uncommon event, but is more likely to occur during a surgeon's early experience. Surgeons beginning their experience with LRP are advised to select their patients carefully to minimize the need for conversion to open surgery. Obese patients and those at risk of periprostatic adhesions should initially not be considered for LRP. Despite open conversion, the functional outcomes did not appear to be adversely affected.

AB - Objectives. To perform a multi-institutional review of the incidence and factors contributing to conversion from laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) to open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) among eight surgeons. Methods. The medical records from all patients undergoing LRP at seven institutions were reviewed to assess the incidence of open conversion to RRP. The clinical, operative, pathologic, and functional outcomes of patients who required conversion were compiled and analyzed. Results. Of 670 operations, 13 (1.9%) were converted from LRP to RRP. The most common steps at which conversion occurred were the apical dissection (38%) and the posterior seminal vesicle dissection (31%). Failure to progress was the most common cause of conversion, followed by injury to adjacent structures and hypercarbia. Comorbidities associated with conversion were prior pelvic surgery and obesity (body mass index greater than 30). Six of the 13 conversions occurred in the surgeons' first 5 cases. Despite open conversion, patients were continent (no pads) (92%) and potent (44%) with at least 6 months of follow-up. Conclusions. Open conversion from LRP to RRP is an uncommon event, but is more likely to occur during a surgeon's early experience. Surgeons beginning their experience with LRP are advised to select their patients carefully to minimize the need for conversion to open surgery. Obese patients and those at risk of periprostatic adhesions should initially not be considered for LRP. Despite open conversion, the functional outcomes did not appear to be adversely affected.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0742272175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0742272175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2003.08.018

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2003.08.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 14751358

AN - SCOPUS:0742272175

VL - 63

SP - 99

EP - 102

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 1

ER -