Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Washington University Initial Experience and Prospective Evaluation of Quality of Life

Jamil Rehman, Maged M. Ragab, Ramakrishna Venkatesh, Jaime Landman, David Lee, Cathy Chen, Yan Yan, Chandru Sundaram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The laparoscopic approach to radical prostatectomy offers an alternative to the open surgical procedure with less morbidity. We prospectively collected data including a validated quality-of-life questionnaires on our first 38 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (LRPs). The first 10 patients (group 1), second 10 patients (group II), and the most recent 18 patients (group III) were examined separately to study the learning curve for this procedure. In addition, we determined the pattern of recovery of urinary continence, potency, and quality of life. Patients and Methods: Between July 1999 and July 2002, 38 consecutive transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomies were performed for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Patients completed quality-of-life questionnaires (Rand 36 Health Survey) before surgery as well as at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and every 6 months thereafter. The patients were also interviewed by an individual not directly involved in patient care. Results: One patient (the second in our experience) was converted to the open approach because of failure to progress. The average operating time for the whole series was 423 ± 137.6 minutes (range 215-825 minutes), the last 10 procedures taking 305 ± 63 minutes (range 215-420 minutes). Complications consisted of one case each of intraoperative bladder injury, transient superficial peroneal nerve palsy, pulmonary embolism, and bladder neck obstruction. The bladder injury was closed laparoscopically without further complication. Bladder neck obstruction was secondary to a bladder wall fold that was treated with transurethral resection 14 months after surgery with good results. Four patients in group 1 had minor anastomotic leaks, while only one patient after that had a leak (group III). Four patients required transfusion, two intraoperatively and two postoperatively. In group III, the urethral catheter remained in place for an average of 8 days (range 6-10 days). With a mean follow-up of 22.8 months (range 9-43 months), 84.8% of the patients had perfect urinary control. Postoperatively, 9 patients (27%) were fully continent on removal of the Foley catheter. At 1, 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively, diurnal urinary control was reported by 30.3%, 48%, 72.7%, and 84.8% of the patients, respectively. One patient needed an artificial urinary sphincter. Among the incontinent patients, 24.2% had urinary urgency, and one third of these patients reported urge incontinence. Conclusions: Laparoscopic prostatectomy is a reproducible technique with a steep learning curve. Operating times and the incidence of anastomotic leaks and urinary incontinence decrease significantly after the initial 10 patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)277-287
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2004

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Quality of Life
Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction
Anastomotic Leak
Urinary Bladder
Learning Curve
Artificial Urinary Sphincter
Urge Urinary Incontinence
Urinary Catheters
Peroneal Nerve
Wounds and Injuries
Urinary Incontinence
Health Surveys
Pulmonary Embolism
Paralysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy : Washington University Initial Experience and Prospective Evaluation of Quality of Life. / Rehman, Jamil; Ragab, Maged M.; Venkatesh, Ramakrishna; Landman, Jaime; Lee, David; Chen, Cathy; Yan, Yan; Sundaram, Chandru.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 18, No. 3, 04.2004, p. 277-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rehman, Jamil ; Ragab, Maged M. ; Venkatesh, Ramakrishna ; Landman, Jaime ; Lee, David ; Chen, Cathy ; Yan, Yan ; Sundaram, Chandru. / Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy : Washington University Initial Experience and Prospective Evaluation of Quality of Life. In: Journal of Endourology. 2004 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 277-287.
@article{7fa5ec59e26e433b993c0410bf0fd81d,
title = "Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Washington University Initial Experience and Prospective Evaluation of Quality of Life",
abstract = "Background and Purpose: The laparoscopic approach to radical prostatectomy offers an alternative to the open surgical procedure with less morbidity. We prospectively collected data including a validated quality-of-life questionnaires on our first 38 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (LRPs). The first 10 patients (group 1), second 10 patients (group II), and the most recent 18 patients (group III) were examined separately to study the learning curve for this procedure. In addition, we determined the pattern of recovery of urinary continence, potency, and quality of life. Patients and Methods: Between July 1999 and July 2002, 38 consecutive transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomies were performed for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Patients completed quality-of-life questionnaires (Rand 36 Health Survey) before surgery as well as at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and every 6 months thereafter. The patients were also interviewed by an individual not directly involved in patient care. Results: One patient (the second in our experience) was converted to the open approach because of failure to progress. The average operating time for the whole series was 423 ± 137.6 minutes (range 215-825 minutes), the last 10 procedures taking 305 ± 63 minutes (range 215-420 minutes). Complications consisted of one case each of intraoperative bladder injury, transient superficial peroneal nerve palsy, pulmonary embolism, and bladder neck obstruction. The bladder injury was closed laparoscopically without further complication. Bladder neck obstruction was secondary to a bladder wall fold that was treated with transurethral resection 14 months after surgery with good results. Four patients in group 1 had minor anastomotic leaks, while only one patient after that had a leak (group III). Four patients required transfusion, two intraoperatively and two postoperatively. In group III, the urethral catheter remained in place for an average of 8 days (range 6-10 days). With a mean follow-up of 22.8 months (range 9-43 months), 84.8{\%} of the patients had perfect urinary control. Postoperatively, 9 patients (27{\%}) were fully continent on removal of the Foley catheter. At 1, 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively, diurnal urinary control was reported by 30.3{\%}, 48{\%}, 72.7{\%}, and 84.8{\%} of the patients, respectively. One patient needed an artificial urinary sphincter. Among the incontinent patients, 24.2{\%} had urinary urgency, and one third of these patients reported urge incontinence. Conclusions: Laparoscopic prostatectomy is a reproducible technique with a steep learning curve. Operating times and the incidence of anastomotic leaks and urinary incontinence decrease significantly after the initial 10 patients.",
author = "Jamil Rehman and Ragab, {Maged M.} and Ramakrishna Venkatesh and Jaime Landman and David Lee and Cathy Chen and Yan Yan and Chandru Sundaram",
year = "2004",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1089/089277904773582903",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "277--287",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

T2 - Washington University Initial Experience and Prospective Evaluation of Quality of Life

AU - Rehman, Jamil

AU - Ragab, Maged M.

AU - Venkatesh, Ramakrishna

AU - Landman, Jaime

AU - Lee, David

AU - Chen, Cathy

AU - Yan, Yan

AU - Sundaram, Chandru

PY - 2004/4

Y1 - 2004/4

N2 - Background and Purpose: The laparoscopic approach to radical prostatectomy offers an alternative to the open surgical procedure with less morbidity. We prospectively collected data including a validated quality-of-life questionnaires on our first 38 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (LRPs). The first 10 patients (group 1), second 10 patients (group II), and the most recent 18 patients (group III) were examined separately to study the learning curve for this procedure. In addition, we determined the pattern of recovery of urinary continence, potency, and quality of life. Patients and Methods: Between July 1999 and July 2002, 38 consecutive transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomies were performed for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Patients completed quality-of-life questionnaires (Rand 36 Health Survey) before surgery as well as at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and every 6 months thereafter. The patients were also interviewed by an individual not directly involved in patient care. Results: One patient (the second in our experience) was converted to the open approach because of failure to progress. The average operating time for the whole series was 423 ± 137.6 minutes (range 215-825 minutes), the last 10 procedures taking 305 ± 63 minutes (range 215-420 minutes). Complications consisted of one case each of intraoperative bladder injury, transient superficial peroneal nerve palsy, pulmonary embolism, and bladder neck obstruction. The bladder injury was closed laparoscopically without further complication. Bladder neck obstruction was secondary to a bladder wall fold that was treated with transurethral resection 14 months after surgery with good results. Four patients in group 1 had minor anastomotic leaks, while only one patient after that had a leak (group III). Four patients required transfusion, two intraoperatively and two postoperatively. In group III, the urethral catheter remained in place for an average of 8 days (range 6-10 days). With a mean follow-up of 22.8 months (range 9-43 months), 84.8% of the patients had perfect urinary control. Postoperatively, 9 patients (27%) were fully continent on removal of the Foley catheter. At 1, 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively, diurnal urinary control was reported by 30.3%, 48%, 72.7%, and 84.8% of the patients, respectively. One patient needed an artificial urinary sphincter. Among the incontinent patients, 24.2% had urinary urgency, and one third of these patients reported urge incontinence. Conclusions: Laparoscopic prostatectomy is a reproducible technique with a steep learning curve. Operating times and the incidence of anastomotic leaks and urinary incontinence decrease significantly after the initial 10 patients.

AB - Background and Purpose: The laparoscopic approach to radical prostatectomy offers an alternative to the open surgical procedure with less morbidity. We prospectively collected data including a validated quality-of-life questionnaires on our first 38 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (LRPs). The first 10 patients (group 1), second 10 patients (group II), and the most recent 18 patients (group III) were examined separately to study the learning curve for this procedure. In addition, we determined the pattern of recovery of urinary continence, potency, and quality of life. Patients and Methods: Between July 1999 and July 2002, 38 consecutive transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomies were performed for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Patients completed quality-of-life questionnaires (Rand 36 Health Survey) before surgery as well as at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and every 6 months thereafter. The patients were also interviewed by an individual not directly involved in patient care. Results: One patient (the second in our experience) was converted to the open approach because of failure to progress. The average operating time for the whole series was 423 ± 137.6 minutes (range 215-825 minutes), the last 10 procedures taking 305 ± 63 minutes (range 215-420 minutes). Complications consisted of one case each of intraoperative bladder injury, transient superficial peroneal nerve palsy, pulmonary embolism, and bladder neck obstruction. The bladder injury was closed laparoscopically without further complication. Bladder neck obstruction was secondary to a bladder wall fold that was treated with transurethral resection 14 months after surgery with good results. Four patients in group 1 had minor anastomotic leaks, while only one patient after that had a leak (group III). Four patients required transfusion, two intraoperatively and two postoperatively. In group III, the urethral catheter remained in place for an average of 8 days (range 6-10 days). With a mean follow-up of 22.8 months (range 9-43 months), 84.8% of the patients had perfect urinary control. Postoperatively, 9 patients (27%) were fully continent on removal of the Foley catheter. At 1, 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively, diurnal urinary control was reported by 30.3%, 48%, 72.7%, and 84.8% of the patients, respectively. One patient needed an artificial urinary sphincter. Among the incontinent patients, 24.2% had urinary urgency, and one third of these patients reported urge incontinence. Conclusions: Laparoscopic prostatectomy is a reproducible technique with a steep learning curve. Operating times and the incidence of anastomotic leaks and urinary incontinence decrease significantly after the initial 10 patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1942518783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1942518783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/089277904773582903

DO - 10.1089/089277904773582903

M3 - Article

C2 - 15225395

AN - SCOPUS:1942518783

VL - 18

SP - 277

EP - 287

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 3

ER -