Lateral loss and dose discrepancies of multileaf collimator segments in intensity modulated radiation therapy

Chee W. Cheng, Indra J. Das, M. Saiful Huq

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the step-and-shoot technique delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), each static field consists of a number of beamlets, some of which may be very small. In this study, we measured the dose characteristics for a range of field sizes: 2×2 to 12×10 cm2 for 6 and 15 MV x rays. For a given field length, a number of treatment fields are set up by sequentially increasing the field width using a multi leaf collimator. A set of fields is delivered with the accelerator operated in the IMRT mode. Using an ion chamber, the output factors at 1 cm and 3 cm laterally from a field edge are measured at different depths in a solid water phantom. Our results show that with insufficient lateral distance in at least one direction, the absorbed dose never reaches the equilibrium values, and can be significantly lower for very small field sizes. For example, the output factor of the 2×2 cm 2 field relative to 10×10 cm2 at dmax is 0.832 and 0.790 for 6 MV and 15 MV x rays, respectively. Multiple output factor curves are obtained for different field lengths and different buildup conditions. Thus under nonequilibrium conditions, output factors are critically dependent on the field size and the conventional method of determining the equivalent square does not apply. Comparison of output factors acquired in the commissioning of the accelerator with those measured in the present study under conditions of nonequilibrium shows large discrepancies between the two sets of measurements. Thus monitor units generated by a treatment planning system using beam data commissioned with symmetric fields may be underestimated by >5%, depending on the size and shape of the segments. To facilitate manual MU calculation as an independent check in step-and-shoot IMRT, the concept of effective equivalent square (EES) is introduced. Using EES, output factors can be calculated using existing beam data for fields with asymmetric collimator settings and under conditions of lateral disequilibrium.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2959-2968
Number of pages10
JournalMedical Physics
Volume30
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radiotherapy
X-Rays
Ions
Water
Therapeutics
Direction compound

Keywords

  • IMRT
  • Lateral disequilibrium
  • MLC
  • Output factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

Lateral loss and dose discrepancies of multileaf collimator segments in intensity modulated radiation therapy. / Cheng, Chee W.; Das, Indra J.; Huq, M. Saiful.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 30, No. 11, 11.2003, p. 2959-2968.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cheng, Chee W. ; Das, Indra J. ; Huq, M. Saiful. / Lateral loss and dose discrepancies of multileaf collimator segments in intensity modulated radiation therapy. In: Medical Physics. 2003 ; Vol. 30, No. 11. pp. 2959-2968.
@article{554b6a497dad4dca8a5995ad4335cf13,
title = "Lateral loss and dose discrepancies of multileaf collimator segments in intensity modulated radiation therapy",
abstract = "In the step-and-shoot technique delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), each static field consists of a number of beamlets, some of which may be very small. In this study, we measured the dose characteristics for a range of field sizes: 2×2 to 12×10 cm2 for 6 and 15 MV x rays. For a given field length, a number of treatment fields are set up by sequentially increasing the field width using a multi leaf collimator. A set of fields is delivered with the accelerator operated in the IMRT mode. Using an ion chamber, the output factors at 1 cm and 3 cm laterally from a field edge are measured at different depths in a solid water phantom. Our results show that with insufficient lateral distance in at least one direction, the absorbed dose never reaches the equilibrium values, and can be significantly lower for very small field sizes. For example, the output factor of the 2×2 cm 2 field relative to 10×10 cm2 at dmax is 0.832 and 0.790 for 6 MV and 15 MV x rays, respectively. Multiple output factor curves are obtained for different field lengths and different buildup conditions. Thus under nonequilibrium conditions, output factors are critically dependent on the field size and the conventional method of determining the equivalent square does not apply. Comparison of output factors acquired in the commissioning of the accelerator with those measured in the present study under conditions of nonequilibrium shows large discrepancies between the two sets of measurements. Thus monitor units generated by a treatment planning system using beam data commissioned with symmetric fields may be underestimated by >5{\%}, depending on the size and shape of the segments. To facilitate manual MU calculation as an independent check in step-and-shoot IMRT, the concept of effective equivalent square (EES) is introduced. Using EES, output factors can be calculated using existing beam data for fields with asymmetric collimator settings and under conditions of lateral disequilibrium.",
keywords = "IMRT, Lateral disequilibrium, MLC, Output factors",
author = "Cheng, {Chee W.} and Das, {Indra J.} and Huq, {M. Saiful}",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1118/1.1619230",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "2959--2968",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lateral loss and dose discrepancies of multileaf collimator segments in intensity modulated radiation therapy

AU - Cheng, Chee W.

AU - Das, Indra J.

AU - Huq, M. Saiful

PY - 2003/11

Y1 - 2003/11

N2 - In the step-and-shoot technique delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), each static field consists of a number of beamlets, some of which may be very small. In this study, we measured the dose characteristics for a range of field sizes: 2×2 to 12×10 cm2 for 6 and 15 MV x rays. For a given field length, a number of treatment fields are set up by sequentially increasing the field width using a multi leaf collimator. A set of fields is delivered with the accelerator operated in the IMRT mode. Using an ion chamber, the output factors at 1 cm and 3 cm laterally from a field edge are measured at different depths in a solid water phantom. Our results show that with insufficient lateral distance in at least one direction, the absorbed dose never reaches the equilibrium values, and can be significantly lower for very small field sizes. For example, the output factor of the 2×2 cm 2 field relative to 10×10 cm2 at dmax is 0.832 and 0.790 for 6 MV and 15 MV x rays, respectively. Multiple output factor curves are obtained for different field lengths and different buildup conditions. Thus under nonequilibrium conditions, output factors are critically dependent on the field size and the conventional method of determining the equivalent square does not apply. Comparison of output factors acquired in the commissioning of the accelerator with those measured in the present study under conditions of nonequilibrium shows large discrepancies between the two sets of measurements. Thus monitor units generated by a treatment planning system using beam data commissioned with symmetric fields may be underestimated by >5%, depending on the size and shape of the segments. To facilitate manual MU calculation as an independent check in step-and-shoot IMRT, the concept of effective equivalent square (EES) is introduced. Using EES, output factors can be calculated using existing beam data for fields with asymmetric collimator settings and under conditions of lateral disequilibrium.

AB - In the step-and-shoot technique delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), each static field consists of a number of beamlets, some of which may be very small. In this study, we measured the dose characteristics for a range of field sizes: 2×2 to 12×10 cm2 for 6 and 15 MV x rays. For a given field length, a number of treatment fields are set up by sequentially increasing the field width using a multi leaf collimator. A set of fields is delivered with the accelerator operated in the IMRT mode. Using an ion chamber, the output factors at 1 cm and 3 cm laterally from a field edge are measured at different depths in a solid water phantom. Our results show that with insufficient lateral distance in at least one direction, the absorbed dose never reaches the equilibrium values, and can be significantly lower for very small field sizes. For example, the output factor of the 2×2 cm 2 field relative to 10×10 cm2 at dmax is 0.832 and 0.790 for 6 MV and 15 MV x rays, respectively. Multiple output factor curves are obtained for different field lengths and different buildup conditions. Thus under nonequilibrium conditions, output factors are critically dependent on the field size and the conventional method of determining the equivalent square does not apply. Comparison of output factors acquired in the commissioning of the accelerator with those measured in the present study under conditions of nonequilibrium shows large discrepancies between the two sets of measurements. Thus monitor units generated by a treatment planning system using beam data commissioned with symmetric fields may be underestimated by >5%, depending on the size and shape of the segments. To facilitate manual MU calculation as an independent check in step-and-shoot IMRT, the concept of effective equivalent square (EES) is introduced. Using EES, output factors can be calculated using existing beam data for fields with asymmetric collimator settings and under conditions of lateral disequilibrium.

KW - IMRT

KW - Lateral disequilibrium

KW - MLC

KW - Output factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345256653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345256653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.1619230

DO - 10.1118/1.1619230

M3 - Article

C2 - 14655943

AN - SCOPUS:0345256653

VL - 30

SP - 2959

EP - 2968

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 11

ER -