Learning from the crowd in terminology mapping: The LOINC experience

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

National policies in the United States require the use of standard terminology for data exchange between clinical information systems. However, most electronic health record systems continue to use local and idiosyncratic ways of representing clinical observations. To improve mappings between local terms and standard vocabularies, we sought to make existing mappings (wisdom) from healt care organizations (the Crowd) available to individuals engaged in mapping processes. We developed new functionality to display counts of local terms and organizations that had previously mapped to a given Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) code. Further, we enabled users to view the details of those mappings, including local term names and the organizations that create the mappings. Users also would have the capacity to contribute their local mappings to a shared mapping repository. In this article, we describe the new functionality and its availability to implementers who desire resources to make mapping more efficient and effective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)168-174
Number of pages7
JournalLaboratory Medicine
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes
Terminology
Learning
Organizations
Vocabulary
Electronic Health Records
Information Systems
Names
Electronic data interchange
Information systems
Health
Availability

Keywords

  • Clinical laboratory information systems
  • Controlled vocabulary
  • Crowdsourcing
  • Electronic health records
  • Health information exchange
  • Logical observation identifiers names and codes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Biochemistry, medical

Cite this

Learning from the crowd in terminology mapping : The LOINC experience. / Dixon, Brian; Hook, John; Vreeman, Daniel.

In: Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 46, No. 2, 01.05.2015, p. 168-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{96a11fd4eb2a4adf9b5bcc956290cea0,
title = "Learning from the crowd in terminology mapping: The LOINC experience",
abstract = "National policies in the United States require the use of standard terminology for data exchange between clinical information systems. However, most electronic health record systems continue to use local and idiosyncratic ways of representing clinical observations. To improve mappings between local terms and standard vocabularies, we sought to make existing mappings (wisdom) from healt care organizations (the Crowd) available to individuals engaged in mapping processes. We developed new functionality to display counts of local terms and organizations that had previously mapped to a given Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) code. Further, we enabled users to view the details of those mappings, including local term names and the organizations that create the mappings. Users also would have the capacity to contribute their local mappings to a shared mapping repository. In this article, we describe the new functionality and its availability to implementers who desire resources to make mapping more efficient and effective.",
keywords = "Clinical laboratory information systems, Controlled vocabulary, Crowdsourcing, Electronic health records, Health information exchange, Logical observation identifiers names and codes",
author = "Brian Dixon and John Hook and Daniel Vreeman",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1309/LMWJ730SVKTUBAOJ",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "168--174",
journal = "Laboratory Medicine",
issn = "0007-5027",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Pathologists",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning from the crowd in terminology mapping

T2 - The LOINC experience

AU - Dixon, Brian

AU - Hook, John

AU - Vreeman, Daniel

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - National policies in the United States require the use of standard terminology for data exchange between clinical information systems. However, most electronic health record systems continue to use local and idiosyncratic ways of representing clinical observations. To improve mappings between local terms and standard vocabularies, we sought to make existing mappings (wisdom) from healt care organizations (the Crowd) available to individuals engaged in mapping processes. We developed new functionality to display counts of local terms and organizations that had previously mapped to a given Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) code. Further, we enabled users to view the details of those mappings, including local term names and the organizations that create the mappings. Users also would have the capacity to contribute their local mappings to a shared mapping repository. In this article, we describe the new functionality and its availability to implementers who desire resources to make mapping more efficient and effective.

AB - National policies in the United States require the use of standard terminology for data exchange between clinical information systems. However, most electronic health record systems continue to use local and idiosyncratic ways of representing clinical observations. To improve mappings between local terms and standard vocabularies, we sought to make existing mappings (wisdom) from healt care organizations (the Crowd) available to individuals engaged in mapping processes. We developed new functionality to display counts of local terms and organizations that had previously mapped to a given Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) code. Further, we enabled users to view the details of those mappings, including local term names and the organizations that create the mappings. Users also would have the capacity to contribute their local mappings to a shared mapping repository. In this article, we describe the new functionality and its availability to implementers who desire resources to make mapping more efficient and effective.

KW - Clinical laboratory information systems

KW - Controlled vocabulary

KW - Crowdsourcing

KW - Electronic health records

KW - Health information exchange

KW - Logical observation identifiers names and codes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949805256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949805256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1309/LMWJ730SVKTUBAOJ

DO - 10.1309/LMWJ730SVKTUBAOJ

M3 - Article

C2 - 25918199

AN - SCOPUS:84949805256

VL - 46

SP - 168

EP - 174

JO - Laboratory Medicine

JF - Laboratory Medicine

SN - 0007-5027

IS - 2

ER -