Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples

Sonya M. Sheffert, Jennifer M. Fellowes, David Pisoni, Robert E. Remez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 5 experiments, the authors investigated how listeners learn to recognize unfamiliar talkers and how experience with specific utterances generalizes to novel instances. Listeners were trained over several days to identify 10 talkers from natural, sinewave, or reversed speech sentences. The sinewave signals preserved phonetic and some suprasegmental properties while eliminating natural vocal quality. In contrast, the reversed speech signals preserved vocal quality while distorting temporally based phonetic properties. The training results indicate that listeners learned to identify talkers even from acoustic signals lacking natural vocal quality. Generalization performance varied across the different signals and depended on the salience of phonetic information. The results suggest similarities in the phonetic attributes underlying talker recognition and phonetic perception.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1447-1469
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Phonetics
Learning
Acoustics
Talkers
Listeners

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples. / Sheffert, Sonya M.; Fellowes, Jennifer M.; Pisoni, David; Remez, Robert E.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 28, No. 6, 01.01.2002, p. 1447-1469.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e1383dea45114d00ae7139508c2c3d01,
title = "Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples",
abstract = "In 5 experiments, the authors investigated how listeners learn to recognize unfamiliar talkers and how experience with specific utterances generalizes to novel instances. Listeners were trained over several days to identify 10 talkers from natural, sinewave, or reversed speech sentences. The sinewave signals preserved phonetic and some suprasegmental properties while eliminating natural vocal quality. In contrast, the reversed speech signals preserved vocal quality while distorting temporally based phonetic properties. The training results indicate that listeners learned to identify talkers even from acoustic signals lacking natural vocal quality. Generalization performance varied across the different signals and depended on the salience of phonetic information. The results suggest similarities in the phonetic attributes underlying talker recognition and phonetic perception.",
author = "Sheffert, {Sonya M.} and Fellowes, {Jennifer M.} and David Pisoni and Remez, {Robert E.}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0096-1523.28.6.1447",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "1447--1469",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance",
issn = "0096-1523",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples

AU - Sheffert, Sonya M.

AU - Fellowes, Jennifer M.

AU - Pisoni, David

AU - Remez, Robert E.

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - In 5 experiments, the authors investigated how listeners learn to recognize unfamiliar talkers and how experience with specific utterances generalizes to novel instances. Listeners were trained over several days to identify 10 talkers from natural, sinewave, or reversed speech sentences. The sinewave signals preserved phonetic and some suprasegmental properties while eliminating natural vocal quality. In contrast, the reversed speech signals preserved vocal quality while distorting temporally based phonetic properties. The training results indicate that listeners learned to identify talkers even from acoustic signals lacking natural vocal quality. Generalization performance varied across the different signals and depended on the salience of phonetic information. The results suggest similarities in the phonetic attributes underlying talker recognition and phonetic perception.

AB - In 5 experiments, the authors investigated how listeners learn to recognize unfamiliar talkers and how experience with specific utterances generalizes to novel instances. Listeners were trained over several days to identify 10 talkers from natural, sinewave, or reversed speech sentences. The sinewave signals preserved phonetic and some suprasegmental properties while eliminating natural vocal quality. In contrast, the reversed speech signals preserved vocal quality while distorting temporally based phonetic properties. The training results indicate that listeners learned to identify talkers even from acoustic signals lacking natural vocal quality. Generalization performance varied across the different signals and depended on the salience of phonetic information. The results suggest similarities in the phonetic attributes underlying talker recognition and phonetic perception.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047674605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047674605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0096-1523.28.6.1447

DO - 10.1037/0096-1523.28.6.1447

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1447

EP - 1469

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

SN - 0096-1523

IS - 6

ER -