Limitation of maximal bronchoconstriction in living dogs

D. O. Warner, S. J. Gunst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fourteen dogs were studied to determine whether (1) interdependence between airways and parenchyma can limit maximal bronchoconstriction under static conditions in vivo, and (2) stretching of airway smooth muscle during tidal breathing can attenuate muscle shortening and account for the limited bronchoconstriction previously observed in response to increasing doses of methacholine (MCh). In six dogs the left lung was ventilated while 50% MCh was nebulized into the airways of the right lower lobe (RLL) held at constant transpulmonary pressures (PL). Airway closure, as assessed by an alveolar capsule technique during small oscillations in lobar volume, occurred at PL ≤ 7.5 cm H2O. To assess the effects of tidal breathing, pulmonary resistance (RL) was measured in four dogs after MCh nebulization into the RLL during tidal breathing while the left lung was separately ventilated. In another four dogs the whole lung was challenged with MCh. At each MCh concentration, RL values in the RLL were much higher than in the whole lungs (30-fold at the highest MCh concentration), showing that maximal bronchoconstriction in response to MCh is much greater in the RLL than in the whole lung. We conclude that neither interdependence nor tidal breathing can fully explain limited maximal bronchoconstriction in living dogs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)553-560
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease
Volume145
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

Bronchoconstriction
Methacholine Chloride
Dogs
Lung
Respiration
Capsules
Smooth Muscle
Pressure
Muscles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Limitation of maximal bronchoconstriction in living dogs. / Warner, D. O.; Gunst, S. J.

In: American Review of Respiratory Disease, Vol. 145, No. 3, 01.01.1992, p. 553-560.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bf8e6d44032f4050b7ea46427437c7b1,
title = "Limitation of maximal bronchoconstriction in living dogs",
abstract = "Fourteen dogs were studied to determine whether (1) interdependence between airways and parenchyma can limit maximal bronchoconstriction under static conditions in vivo, and (2) stretching of airway smooth muscle during tidal breathing can attenuate muscle shortening and account for the limited bronchoconstriction previously observed in response to increasing doses of methacholine (MCh). In six dogs the left lung was ventilated while 50{\%} MCh was nebulized into the airways of the right lower lobe (RLL) held at constant transpulmonary pressures (PL). Airway closure, as assessed by an alveolar capsule technique during small oscillations in lobar volume, occurred at PL ≤ 7.5 cm H2O. To assess the effects of tidal breathing, pulmonary resistance (RL) was measured in four dogs after MCh nebulization into the RLL during tidal breathing while the left lung was separately ventilated. In another four dogs the whole lung was challenged with MCh. At each MCh concentration, RL values in the RLL were much higher than in the whole lungs (30-fold at the highest MCh concentration), showing that maximal bronchoconstriction in response to MCh is much greater in the RLL than in the whole lung. We conclude that neither interdependence nor tidal breathing can fully explain limited maximal bronchoconstriction in living dogs.",
author = "Warner, {D. O.} and Gunst, {S. J.}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1164/ajrccm/145.3.553",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "145",
pages = "553--560",
journal = "American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "1073-449X",
publisher = "American Thoracic Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Limitation of maximal bronchoconstriction in living dogs

AU - Warner, D. O.

AU - Gunst, S. J.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - Fourteen dogs were studied to determine whether (1) interdependence between airways and parenchyma can limit maximal bronchoconstriction under static conditions in vivo, and (2) stretching of airway smooth muscle during tidal breathing can attenuate muscle shortening and account for the limited bronchoconstriction previously observed in response to increasing doses of methacholine (MCh). In six dogs the left lung was ventilated while 50% MCh was nebulized into the airways of the right lower lobe (RLL) held at constant transpulmonary pressures (PL). Airway closure, as assessed by an alveolar capsule technique during small oscillations in lobar volume, occurred at PL ≤ 7.5 cm H2O. To assess the effects of tidal breathing, pulmonary resistance (RL) was measured in four dogs after MCh nebulization into the RLL during tidal breathing while the left lung was separately ventilated. In another four dogs the whole lung was challenged with MCh. At each MCh concentration, RL values in the RLL were much higher than in the whole lungs (30-fold at the highest MCh concentration), showing that maximal bronchoconstriction in response to MCh is much greater in the RLL than in the whole lung. We conclude that neither interdependence nor tidal breathing can fully explain limited maximal bronchoconstriction in living dogs.

AB - Fourteen dogs were studied to determine whether (1) interdependence between airways and parenchyma can limit maximal bronchoconstriction under static conditions in vivo, and (2) stretching of airway smooth muscle during tidal breathing can attenuate muscle shortening and account for the limited bronchoconstriction previously observed in response to increasing doses of methacholine (MCh). In six dogs the left lung was ventilated while 50% MCh was nebulized into the airways of the right lower lobe (RLL) held at constant transpulmonary pressures (PL). Airway closure, as assessed by an alveolar capsule technique during small oscillations in lobar volume, occurred at PL ≤ 7.5 cm H2O. To assess the effects of tidal breathing, pulmonary resistance (RL) was measured in four dogs after MCh nebulization into the RLL during tidal breathing while the left lung was separately ventilated. In another four dogs the whole lung was challenged with MCh. At each MCh concentration, RL values in the RLL were much higher than in the whole lungs (30-fold at the highest MCh concentration), showing that maximal bronchoconstriction in response to MCh is much greater in the RLL than in the whole lung. We conclude that neither interdependence nor tidal breathing can fully explain limited maximal bronchoconstriction in living dogs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026608340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026608340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1164/ajrccm/145.3.553

DO - 10.1164/ajrccm/145.3.553

M3 - Article

C2 - 1546835

AN - SCOPUS:0026608340

VL - 145

SP - 553

EP - 560

JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

SN - 1073-449X

IS - 3

ER -