Linking HIV-Negative Youth to Prevention Services in 12 U.S. Cities: Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing the HIV Prevention Continuum

Mimi Doll, J. Fortenberry, Denise Roseland, Kathleen McAuliff, Craig M. Wilson, Cherrie B. Boyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Linkage of HIV-negative youth to prevention services is increasingly important with the development of effective pre-exposure prophylaxis that complements behavioral and other prevention-focused interventions. However, effective infrastructure for delivery of prevention services does not exist, leaving many programs to address HIV prevention without data to guide program development/implementation. The objective of this study was to provide a qualitative description of barriers and facilitators of linkage to prevention services among high-risk, HIV-negative youth. Design: Thematic analysis of structured interviews with staff implementing linkage to prevention services programs for youth aged 12–24 years. Methods: Twelve adolescent medicine HIV primary care programs as part of larger testing research program focused on young sexual minority men of color. The study included staff implementing linkage to prevention services programs along with community-based HIV testing programs. The main outcomes of the study were key barriers/facilitators to linkage to prevention services. Results: Eight themes summarized perspectives on linkage to prevention services: (1) relationships with community partners, (2) trust between providers and youth, (3) youth capacity to navigate prevention services, (4) pre-exposure prophylaxis specific issues, (5) privacy issues, (6) gaps in health records preventing tailored services, (7) confidentiality of care for youth accessing services through parents’/caretakers’ insurance, and (8) need for health-care institutions to keep pace with models that prioritize HIV prevention among at-risk youth. Themes are discussed in the context of factors that facilitated/challenged linkage to prevention services. Conclusions: Several evidence-based HIV prevention tools are available; infrastructures for coordinated service delivery to high-risk youth have not been developed. Implementation of such infrastructures requires attention to community-, provider-, and youth-related issues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)424-433
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Adolescent Health
Volume62
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

HIV
Adolescent Medicine
Program Development
Privacy
Confidentiality
Insurance
Primary Health Care
Color
Parents
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care
Health
Research

Keywords

  • High-risk HIV-negative youth
  • HIV prevention
  • HIV prevention infrastructure
  • Linkage to prevention
  • YMSM of color

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Linking HIV-Negative Youth to Prevention Services in 12 U.S. Cities : Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing the HIV Prevention Continuum. / Doll, Mimi; Fortenberry, J.; Roseland, Denise; McAuliff, Kathleen; Wilson, Craig M.; Boyer, Cherrie B.

In: Journal of Adolescent Health, Vol. 62, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 424-433.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Doll, Mimi ; Fortenberry, J. ; Roseland, Denise ; McAuliff, Kathleen ; Wilson, Craig M. ; Boyer, Cherrie B. / Linking HIV-Negative Youth to Prevention Services in 12 U.S. Cities : Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing the HIV Prevention Continuum. In: Journal of Adolescent Health. 2018 ; Vol. 62, No. 4. pp. 424-433.
@article{c9529bf46aa64bb18528ce73cf939887,
title = "Linking HIV-Negative Youth to Prevention Services in 12 U.S. Cities: Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing the HIV Prevention Continuum",
abstract = "Purpose: Linkage of HIV-negative youth to prevention services is increasingly important with the development of effective pre-exposure prophylaxis that complements behavioral and other prevention-focused interventions. However, effective infrastructure for delivery of prevention services does not exist, leaving many programs to address HIV prevention without data to guide program development/implementation. The objective of this study was to provide a qualitative description of barriers and facilitators of linkage to prevention services among high-risk, HIV-negative youth. Design: Thematic analysis of structured interviews with staff implementing linkage to prevention services programs for youth aged 12–24 years. Methods: Twelve adolescent medicine HIV primary care programs as part of larger testing research program focused on young sexual minority men of color. The study included staff implementing linkage to prevention services programs along with community-based HIV testing programs. The main outcomes of the study were key barriers/facilitators to linkage to prevention services. Results: Eight themes summarized perspectives on linkage to prevention services: (1) relationships with community partners, (2) trust between providers and youth, (3) youth capacity to navigate prevention services, (4) pre-exposure prophylaxis specific issues, (5) privacy issues, (6) gaps in health records preventing tailored services, (7) confidentiality of care for youth accessing services through parents’/caretakers’ insurance, and (8) need for health-care institutions to keep pace with models that prioritize HIV prevention among at-risk youth. Themes are discussed in the context of factors that facilitated/challenged linkage to prevention services. Conclusions: Several evidence-based HIV prevention tools are available; infrastructures for coordinated service delivery to high-risk youth have not been developed. Implementation of such infrastructures requires attention to community-, provider-, and youth-related issues.",
keywords = "High-risk HIV-negative youth, HIV prevention, HIV prevention infrastructure, Linkage to prevention, YMSM of color",
author = "Mimi Doll and J. Fortenberry and Denise Roseland and Kathleen McAuliff and Wilson, {Craig M.} and Boyer, {Cherrie B.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.09.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "424--433",
journal = "Journal of Adolescent Health",
issn = "1054-139X",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Linking HIV-Negative Youth to Prevention Services in 12 U.S. Cities

T2 - Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing the HIV Prevention Continuum

AU - Doll, Mimi

AU - Fortenberry, J.

AU - Roseland, Denise

AU - McAuliff, Kathleen

AU - Wilson, Craig M.

AU - Boyer, Cherrie B.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Purpose: Linkage of HIV-negative youth to prevention services is increasingly important with the development of effective pre-exposure prophylaxis that complements behavioral and other prevention-focused interventions. However, effective infrastructure for delivery of prevention services does not exist, leaving many programs to address HIV prevention without data to guide program development/implementation. The objective of this study was to provide a qualitative description of barriers and facilitators of linkage to prevention services among high-risk, HIV-negative youth. Design: Thematic analysis of structured interviews with staff implementing linkage to prevention services programs for youth aged 12–24 years. Methods: Twelve adolescent medicine HIV primary care programs as part of larger testing research program focused on young sexual minority men of color. The study included staff implementing linkage to prevention services programs along with community-based HIV testing programs. The main outcomes of the study were key barriers/facilitators to linkage to prevention services. Results: Eight themes summarized perspectives on linkage to prevention services: (1) relationships with community partners, (2) trust between providers and youth, (3) youth capacity to navigate prevention services, (4) pre-exposure prophylaxis specific issues, (5) privacy issues, (6) gaps in health records preventing tailored services, (7) confidentiality of care for youth accessing services through parents’/caretakers’ insurance, and (8) need for health-care institutions to keep pace with models that prioritize HIV prevention among at-risk youth. Themes are discussed in the context of factors that facilitated/challenged linkage to prevention services. Conclusions: Several evidence-based HIV prevention tools are available; infrastructures for coordinated service delivery to high-risk youth have not been developed. Implementation of such infrastructures requires attention to community-, provider-, and youth-related issues.

AB - Purpose: Linkage of HIV-negative youth to prevention services is increasingly important with the development of effective pre-exposure prophylaxis that complements behavioral and other prevention-focused interventions. However, effective infrastructure for delivery of prevention services does not exist, leaving many programs to address HIV prevention without data to guide program development/implementation. The objective of this study was to provide a qualitative description of barriers and facilitators of linkage to prevention services among high-risk, HIV-negative youth. Design: Thematic analysis of structured interviews with staff implementing linkage to prevention services programs for youth aged 12–24 years. Methods: Twelve adolescent medicine HIV primary care programs as part of larger testing research program focused on young sexual minority men of color. The study included staff implementing linkage to prevention services programs along with community-based HIV testing programs. The main outcomes of the study were key barriers/facilitators to linkage to prevention services. Results: Eight themes summarized perspectives on linkage to prevention services: (1) relationships with community partners, (2) trust between providers and youth, (3) youth capacity to navigate prevention services, (4) pre-exposure prophylaxis specific issues, (5) privacy issues, (6) gaps in health records preventing tailored services, (7) confidentiality of care for youth accessing services through parents’/caretakers’ insurance, and (8) need for health-care institutions to keep pace with models that prioritize HIV prevention among at-risk youth. Themes are discussed in the context of factors that facilitated/challenged linkage to prevention services. Conclusions: Several evidence-based HIV prevention tools are available; infrastructures for coordinated service delivery to high-risk youth have not been developed. Implementation of such infrastructures requires attention to community-, provider-, and youth-related issues.

KW - High-risk HIV-negative youth

KW - HIV prevention

KW - HIV prevention infrastructure

KW - Linkage to prevention

KW - YMSM of color

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044666593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044666593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.09.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.09.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 29224988

AN - SCOPUS:85044666593

VL - 62

SP - 424

EP - 433

JO - Journal of Adolescent Health

JF - Journal of Adolescent Health

SN - 1054-139X

IS - 4

ER -