Lions Clubs International Foundation Core Four photoscreening

Results from 17 programs and 400,000 preschool children

Sean P. Donahue, John D. Baker, William E. Scott, Paul Rychwalski, Daniel Neely, Patrick Tong, Donald Bergsma, Deborah Lenahan, Dawn Rush, Ken Heinlein, Ron Walkenbach, Tammy M. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Photoscreening programs for preschool vision screening have been promoted by Lions Clubs International Foundation (LCIF) via their 17 Core Four grant project awards since 1999. Results from 15 Core Four grant programs in the United States and one in Taiwan are presented here. Methods: Photoscreening was modeled after the Tennessee program and instituted statewide in each area. Programs were given latitude with respect to screening instrument and referral criteria, but a partnering academic institution and medical director were expected. Preschool children were screened by volunteers; referred children were examined by community optometrists and ophthalmologists who returned results to each program's coordinating center. Outcome data included number of children screened, referral rate, follow-up rate, and positive predictive value, which was generally determined using AAPOS-defined vision screening criteria. Results: All but one program used the MTI photoscreener (it chose not to participate); photoscreening referral criteria were standard for 13 programs. Through December 2004, more than 400,000 preschool children had been screened. The referral rate for programs using the MTI photoscreener averaged 5.2% (range, 3.7-12.6%). The predictive value of a positive photoscreen was 80%. Overall, 54% of referred children received follow-up examinations. Follow-up rate was the largest variable: 4 programs, screening nearly 250,000 children, had follow-up rates 70% or greater; 10 programs had follow-up data from fewer than 40% of referred children. Conclusions: Volunteer-led photoscreening programs can be instituted in other locations, including overseas, with high levels of effectiveness. Limitations include the possibility of poor success and variable attention to follow-up.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-48
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of AAPOS
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006

Fingerprint

Lions
Preschool Children
Referral and Consultation
Vision Screening
Organized Financing
Volunteers
Physician Executives
Taiwan

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Lions Clubs International Foundation Core Four photoscreening : Results from 17 programs and 400,000 preschool children. / Donahue, Sean P.; Baker, John D.; Scott, William E.; Rychwalski, Paul; Neely, Daniel; Tong, Patrick; Bergsma, Donald; Lenahan, Deborah; Rush, Dawn; Heinlein, Ken; Walkenbach, Ron; Johnson, Tammy M.

In: Journal of AAPOS, Vol. 10, No. 1, 02.2006, p. 44-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Donahue, SP, Baker, JD, Scott, WE, Rychwalski, P, Neely, D, Tong, P, Bergsma, D, Lenahan, D, Rush, D, Heinlein, K, Walkenbach, R & Johnson, TM 2006, 'Lions Clubs International Foundation Core Four photoscreening: Results from 17 programs and 400,000 preschool children', Journal of AAPOS, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 44-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2005.08.007
Donahue, Sean P. ; Baker, John D. ; Scott, William E. ; Rychwalski, Paul ; Neely, Daniel ; Tong, Patrick ; Bergsma, Donald ; Lenahan, Deborah ; Rush, Dawn ; Heinlein, Ken ; Walkenbach, Ron ; Johnson, Tammy M. / Lions Clubs International Foundation Core Four photoscreening : Results from 17 programs and 400,000 preschool children. In: Journal of AAPOS. 2006 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 44-48.
@article{0301349e28434faba6a273adffc32dda,
title = "Lions Clubs International Foundation Core Four photoscreening: Results from 17 programs and 400,000 preschool children",
abstract = "Introduction: Photoscreening programs for preschool vision screening have been promoted by Lions Clubs International Foundation (LCIF) via their 17 Core Four grant project awards since 1999. Results from 15 Core Four grant programs in the United States and one in Taiwan are presented here. Methods: Photoscreening was modeled after the Tennessee program and instituted statewide in each area. Programs were given latitude with respect to screening instrument and referral criteria, but a partnering academic institution and medical director were expected. Preschool children were screened by volunteers; referred children were examined by community optometrists and ophthalmologists who returned results to each program's coordinating center. Outcome data included number of children screened, referral rate, follow-up rate, and positive predictive value, which was generally determined using AAPOS-defined vision screening criteria. Results: All but one program used the MTI photoscreener (it chose not to participate); photoscreening referral criteria were standard for 13 programs. Through December 2004, more than 400,000 preschool children had been screened. The referral rate for programs using the MTI photoscreener averaged 5.2{\%} (range, 3.7-12.6{\%}). The predictive value of a positive photoscreen was 80{\%}. Overall, 54{\%} of referred children received follow-up examinations. Follow-up rate was the largest variable: 4 programs, screening nearly 250,000 children, had follow-up rates 70{\%} or greater; 10 programs had follow-up data from fewer than 40{\%} of referred children. Conclusions: Volunteer-led photoscreening programs can be instituted in other locations, including overseas, with high levels of effectiveness. Limitations include the possibility of poor success and variable attention to follow-up.",
author = "Donahue, {Sean P.} and Baker, {John D.} and Scott, {William E.} and Paul Rychwalski and Daniel Neely and Patrick Tong and Donald Bergsma and Deborah Lenahan and Dawn Rush and Ken Heinlein and Ron Walkenbach and Johnson, {Tammy M.}",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaapos.2005.08.007",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "44--48",
journal = "Journal of AAPOS",
issn = "1091-8531",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lions Clubs International Foundation Core Four photoscreening

T2 - Results from 17 programs and 400,000 preschool children

AU - Donahue, Sean P.

AU - Baker, John D.

AU - Scott, William E.

AU - Rychwalski, Paul

AU - Neely, Daniel

AU - Tong, Patrick

AU - Bergsma, Donald

AU - Lenahan, Deborah

AU - Rush, Dawn

AU - Heinlein, Ken

AU - Walkenbach, Ron

AU - Johnson, Tammy M.

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - Introduction: Photoscreening programs for preschool vision screening have been promoted by Lions Clubs International Foundation (LCIF) via their 17 Core Four grant project awards since 1999. Results from 15 Core Four grant programs in the United States and one in Taiwan are presented here. Methods: Photoscreening was modeled after the Tennessee program and instituted statewide in each area. Programs were given latitude with respect to screening instrument and referral criteria, but a partnering academic institution and medical director were expected. Preschool children were screened by volunteers; referred children were examined by community optometrists and ophthalmologists who returned results to each program's coordinating center. Outcome data included number of children screened, referral rate, follow-up rate, and positive predictive value, which was generally determined using AAPOS-defined vision screening criteria. Results: All but one program used the MTI photoscreener (it chose not to participate); photoscreening referral criteria were standard for 13 programs. Through December 2004, more than 400,000 preschool children had been screened. The referral rate for programs using the MTI photoscreener averaged 5.2% (range, 3.7-12.6%). The predictive value of a positive photoscreen was 80%. Overall, 54% of referred children received follow-up examinations. Follow-up rate was the largest variable: 4 programs, screening nearly 250,000 children, had follow-up rates 70% or greater; 10 programs had follow-up data from fewer than 40% of referred children. Conclusions: Volunteer-led photoscreening programs can be instituted in other locations, including overseas, with high levels of effectiveness. Limitations include the possibility of poor success and variable attention to follow-up.

AB - Introduction: Photoscreening programs for preschool vision screening have been promoted by Lions Clubs International Foundation (LCIF) via their 17 Core Four grant project awards since 1999. Results from 15 Core Four grant programs in the United States and one in Taiwan are presented here. Methods: Photoscreening was modeled after the Tennessee program and instituted statewide in each area. Programs were given latitude with respect to screening instrument and referral criteria, but a partnering academic institution and medical director were expected. Preschool children were screened by volunteers; referred children were examined by community optometrists and ophthalmologists who returned results to each program's coordinating center. Outcome data included number of children screened, referral rate, follow-up rate, and positive predictive value, which was generally determined using AAPOS-defined vision screening criteria. Results: All but one program used the MTI photoscreener (it chose not to participate); photoscreening referral criteria were standard for 13 programs. Through December 2004, more than 400,000 preschool children had been screened. The referral rate for programs using the MTI photoscreener averaged 5.2% (range, 3.7-12.6%). The predictive value of a positive photoscreen was 80%. Overall, 54% of referred children received follow-up examinations. Follow-up rate was the largest variable: 4 programs, screening nearly 250,000 children, had follow-up rates 70% or greater; 10 programs had follow-up data from fewer than 40% of referred children. Conclusions: Volunteer-led photoscreening programs can be instituted in other locations, including overseas, with high levels of effectiveness. Limitations include the possibility of poor success and variable attention to follow-up.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644764636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644764636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaapos.2005.08.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jaapos.2005.08.007

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 44

EP - 48

JO - Journal of AAPOS

JF - Journal of AAPOS

SN - 1091-8531

IS - 1

ER -