Long-term recovery course after traumatic brain injury

A comparison of the Functional Independence Measure and disability rating scale

Flora Hammond, Karyn D. Grattan, Howell Sasser, John D. Corrigan, Tamara Bushnik, Ross D. Zafonte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To study group changes over time after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design: Prospective cohort. Setting and Participants: TBI Model System Database with 1160 subjects using cohort with complete data. Main Outcome Measures: Functional Independence Measure (FIM™) and Disability Rating Scale (DRS) at rehabilitation discharge and annually after injury. Results: Statistically significant differences existed between FIM™-Total, FIM™-Motor, FIM™-Cognitive subscales, and DRS at rehabilitation discharge and year 1. Comparisons of year-to-year intervals, years 1 and 3, 1 and 5, and 3 and 5, revealed no statistically significant differences except between years 1 and 3 and 1 and 5 with DRS, and years 1 and 5 with FIM™. Including only those more dependent at year 1 revealed statistically significant differences between years 1 and 2 and 1 and 5 on FIM™-Cognitive and DRS, but not the FIM™-Motor. The proportion of change for FIM™ and DRS items from year 1 to years 2 and 5 revealed DRS Level of Functioning and Employability items accounted for most DRS change, whereas FIM™ change was more spread across its components. Conclusions: DRS is more sensitive to changes during a shorter time period than FIM™ and seems to be more appropriate for detecting long-term deficits. However, research studies aimed at detecting meaningful changes year to year after TBI may need to use other tools or consider changes among individuals instead of group changes. DRS Level of Function and Employability Items represent complex functions expected to recover later than the more basic DRS items. Sole use of these two DRS items might provide an efficient means of measuring long-term recovery when resources are limited, whereas expansion of these two items might allow greater sensitivity and detail.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)318-329
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Volume16
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rehabilitation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Wounds and Injuries
Research
Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

  • Brain injury
  • Disability Rating Scale
  • Functional Independence Measure
  • Outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Long-term recovery course after traumatic brain injury : A comparison of the Functional Independence Measure and disability rating scale. / Hammond, Flora; Grattan, Karyn D.; Sasser, Howell; Corrigan, John D.; Bushnik, Tamara; Zafonte, Ross D.

In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2001, p. 318-329.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hammond, Flora ; Grattan, Karyn D. ; Sasser, Howell ; Corrigan, John D. ; Bushnik, Tamara ; Zafonte, Ross D. / Long-term recovery course after traumatic brain injury : A comparison of the Functional Independence Measure and disability rating scale. In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2001 ; Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 318-329.
@article{52cc276465724ee9afedc4f392ac8545,
title = "Long-term recovery course after traumatic brain injury: A comparison of the Functional Independence Measure and disability rating scale",
abstract = "Objectives: To study group changes over time after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design: Prospective cohort. Setting and Participants: TBI Model System Database with 1160 subjects using cohort with complete data. Main Outcome Measures: Functional Independence Measure (FIM™) and Disability Rating Scale (DRS) at rehabilitation discharge and annually after injury. Results: Statistically significant differences existed between FIM™-Total, FIM™-Motor, FIM™-Cognitive subscales, and DRS at rehabilitation discharge and year 1. Comparisons of year-to-year intervals, years 1 and 3, 1 and 5, and 3 and 5, revealed no statistically significant differences except between years 1 and 3 and 1 and 5 with DRS, and years 1 and 5 with FIM™. Including only those more dependent at year 1 revealed statistically significant differences between years 1 and 2 and 1 and 5 on FIM™-Cognitive and DRS, but not the FIM™-Motor. The proportion of change for FIM™ and DRS items from year 1 to years 2 and 5 revealed DRS Level of Functioning and Employability items accounted for most DRS change, whereas FIM™ change was more spread across its components. Conclusions: DRS is more sensitive to changes during a shorter time period than FIM™ and seems to be more appropriate for detecting long-term deficits. However, research studies aimed at detecting meaningful changes year to year after TBI may need to use other tools or consider changes among individuals instead of group changes. DRS Level of Function and Employability Items represent complex functions expected to recover later than the more basic DRS items. Sole use of these two DRS items might provide an efficient means of measuring long-term recovery when resources are limited, whereas expansion of these two items might allow greater sensitivity and detail.",
keywords = "Brain injury, Disability Rating Scale, Functional Independence Measure, Outcome",
author = "Flora Hammond and Grattan, {Karyn D.} and Howell Sasser and Corrigan, {John D.} and Tamara Bushnik and Zafonte, {Ross D.}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "318--329",
journal = "Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation",
issn = "0885-9701",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-term recovery course after traumatic brain injury

T2 - A comparison of the Functional Independence Measure and disability rating scale

AU - Hammond, Flora

AU - Grattan, Karyn D.

AU - Sasser, Howell

AU - Corrigan, John D.

AU - Bushnik, Tamara

AU - Zafonte, Ross D.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Objectives: To study group changes over time after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design: Prospective cohort. Setting and Participants: TBI Model System Database with 1160 subjects using cohort with complete data. Main Outcome Measures: Functional Independence Measure (FIM™) and Disability Rating Scale (DRS) at rehabilitation discharge and annually after injury. Results: Statistically significant differences existed between FIM™-Total, FIM™-Motor, FIM™-Cognitive subscales, and DRS at rehabilitation discharge and year 1. Comparisons of year-to-year intervals, years 1 and 3, 1 and 5, and 3 and 5, revealed no statistically significant differences except between years 1 and 3 and 1 and 5 with DRS, and years 1 and 5 with FIM™. Including only those more dependent at year 1 revealed statistically significant differences between years 1 and 2 and 1 and 5 on FIM™-Cognitive and DRS, but not the FIM™-Motor. The proportion of change for FIM™ and DRS items from year 1 to years 2 and 5 revealed DRS Level of Functioning and Employability items accounted for most DRS change, whereas FIM™ change was more spread across its components. Conclusions: DRS is more sensitive to changes during a shorter time period than FIM™ and seems to be more appropriate for detecting long-term deficits. However, research studies aimed at detecting meaningful changes year to year after TBI may need to use other tools or consider changes among individuals instead of group changes. DRS Level of Function and Employability Items represent complex functions expected to recover later than the more basic DRS items. Sole use of these two DRS items might provide an efficient means of measuring long-term recovery when resources are limited, whereas expansion of these two items might allow greater sensitivity and detail.

AB - Objectives: To study group changes over time after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design: Prospective cohort. Setting and Participants: TBI Model System Database with 1160 subjects using cohort with complete data. Main Outcome Measures: Functional Independence Measure (FIM™) and Disability Rating Scale (DRS) at rehabilitation discharge and annually after injury. Results: Statistically significant differences existed between FIM™-Total, FIM™-Motor, FIM™-Cognitive subscales, and DRS at rehabilitation discharge and year 1. Comparisons of year-to-year intervals, years 1 and 3, 1 and 5, and 3 and 5, revealed no statistically significant differences except between years 1 and 3 and 1 and 5 with DRS, and years 1 and 5 with FIM™. Including only those more dependent at year 1 revealed statistically significant differences between years 1 and 2 and 1 and 5 on FIM™-Cognitive and DRS, but not the FIM™-Motor. The proportion of change for FIM™ and DRS items from year 1 to years 2 and 5 revealed DRS Level of Functioning and Employability items accounted for most DRS change, whereas FIM™ change was more spread across its components. Conclusions: DRS is more sensitive to changes during a shorter time period than FIM™ and seems to be more appropriate for detecting long-term deficits. However, research studies aimed at detecting meaningful changes year to year after TBI may need to use other tools or consider changes among individuals instead of group changes. DRS Level of Function and Employability Items represent complex functions expected to recover later than the more basic DRS items. Sole use of these two DRS items might provide an efficient means of measuring long-term recovery when resources are limited, whereas expansion of these two items might allow greater sensitivity and detail.

KW - Brain injury

KW - Disability Rating Scale

KW - Functional Independence Measure

KW - Outcome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034902494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034902494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 318

EP - 329

JO - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

SN - 0885-9701

IS - 4

ER -